Guest The Special One Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Gerrard, Terry, Joe Cole and Hargreaves can take pride in tonights game, the rest should be ashamed of themselves. Beckham must be sucking off Sven to be keeping his place. Ashley Cole aint fit Sol Campbell at fault for the goal is pants and still thinking about sucking Ashley Coles cock Carragher not a right back Rio is still on drugs Lampard lazy Crouch f??ckin hopeless Owen a waste of space Rooney has potential to kick start us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pike_mill_white Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Gerrard, Terry, Joe Cole and Hargreaves can take pride in tonights game, the rest should be ashamed of themselves. Beckham must be sucking off Sven to be keeping his place. Ashley Cole aint fit Sol Campbell at fault for the goal is pants and still thinking about sucking Ashley Coles cock Carragher not a right back Rio is still on drugs Lampard lazy Crouch f??ckin hopeless Owen a waste of space Rooney has potential to kick start us Agree with most of that but Lampard Lazy??? Behave!! Didn't play great tonight but still got around the pitch as well as anyone. Apart from that spot on Jay!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomy taylor Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Gerrard, Terry, Joe Cole and Hargreaves can take pride in tonights game, the rest should be ashamed of themselves. Beckham must be sucking off Sven to be keeping his place. Ashley Cole aint fit Sol Campbell at fault for the goal is pants and still thinking about sucking Ashley Coles cock Carragher not a right back Rio is still on drugs Lampard lazy Crouch f??ckin hopeless Owen a waste of space Rooney has potential to kick start us Agree with most of that but Lampard Lazy??? Behave!! Didn't play great tonight but still got around the pitch as well as anyone. Apart from that spot on Jay!! might not have been lazy, but has got to realise that there are other players who can score, and tey will have a better chance from 12 yards instead of his usual 30 yard pops, which havn't paid off with the new ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted June 20, 2006 Moderators Share Posted June 20, 2006 i didn't realise lampard was playing but then again he didn't want to get booked question is though why take theo walcott? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiffs Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Jay There are a lot of references to blokes sucking cock there Is there something you want to tell us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bea Smith Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 Jay There are a lot of references to blokes sucking cock there Is there something you want to tell us? he swallows????....??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted June 20, 2006 Moderators Share Posted June 20, 2006 actually, just watched first half highlights and i take it back about lampard, he was getting involved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yardbones Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 question is though why take theo walcott? I've been asking myself this ever since he picked him. One other forward not fully fit, one seemingly out. It's 4-5-1 from now on. Have they changed the rule about calling up replacements? I remember Robson being replaced when he did his shoulder in at the '86 Finals. Or is that what this rule is regarding 24 hours before the first match? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomy taylor Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 personally don't think we have the players to play 4-5-1 either, because strikers we have crouch, useless bugger, rooney who's nowhere near fit enough to play a lone striker role for too long, and walcott, well..... best set of players we've had in a long time and the swedish pillock cocks everything up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ani Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 i didn't realise lampard was playing but then again he didn't want to get booked question is though why take theo walcott? or carrick or jenas ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 The players who just missed out on this squad must be well p??ssed off! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 The players who just missed out on this squad must be well p??ssed off! Aye Bent, Defoe & Johnson must be going ballistic that at least one of them wasn't included when Svennis had his 2 top strikers injured! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exiledwhite2 Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 i didn't realise lampard was playing but then again he didn't want to get booked question is though why take theo walcott? or carrick or jenas ??? Exactly He won't play Carrick come what may, so WHY take him? Jenas is outright shit, so why take him? I can see no logic in the decision not to take either Defoe, Jonhson or Bent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ani Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 and another thing. Terry was amongst the worst last night, no one mentions how poor he has been in every game. we will beat ecuador and we always put in one big performance in every tournament so either a heroic defeat in the quarters or a damb squib in the semis you decide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 The players who just missed out on this squad must be well p??ssed off! Aye Bent, Defoe & Johnson must be going ballistic that at least one of them wasn't included when Svennis had his 2 top strikers injured! Bent should have gone, no question about it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts