Is he going to sue the BBC for libel and defamation of character?

Either do it or grow up and have a post match interview with MOTD.

Edited December 26, 200718 yr by no balls

He's a Penis leave him too it.

 

He will be sacked soon anyway so it wont matter

If i was a Newcastle supporter i would be mightily pissed off that the manager sends out Nigel 'Interesting' Pearson to answer for yet another dismal display. It just smacks of arrogance on Fat Sam's part.

If i was a Newcastle supporter i would be mightily pissed off that the manager sends out Nigel 'Interesting' Pearson to answer for yet another dismal display. It just smacks of arrogance on Fat Sam's part.

 

 

Allardyce and Ferguson don't do interviews with the BBC anymore after prior events. Fergie always sends out that Querioz guy.

If i was a Newcastle supporter i would be mightily pissed off that the manager sends out Nigel 'Interesting' Pearson to answer for yet another dismal display. It just smacks of arrogance on Fat Sam's part.

 

 

Allardyce and Ferguson don't do interviews with the BBC anymore after prior events. Fergie always sends out that Querioz guy.

Allardyce and Ferguson don't do interviews with the BBC anymore after prior events.

And my point is re: Allardyce, if the BBC lied then why hasn't he sued them?

If i was a Newcastle supporter i would be mightily pissed off that the manager sends out Nigel 'Interesting' Pearson to answer for yet another dismal display. It just smacks of arrogance on Fat Sam's part.

 

 

Sam arrogant??

 

surely not...

Harry Redknapp doesn't do BBC interviews either.

And my point is re: Allardyce, if the BBC lied then why hasn't he sued them?

 

i think this was explained by gartside ome time ago.

 

but cant remember the reason, sommit to do with not dragging the club and staff through the courts i think.

Edited December 28, 200718 yr by HomerJay

Allardyce and Ferguson don't do interviews with the BBC anymore after prior events. Fergie always sends out that Querioz guy.

 

No shit Sherlock.

He can't sue them any more. Got to do it within a year.

He can't sue them any more. Got to do it within a year.

Fair enough. There's sense in that law.

Before I make my own conclusions about that man, does anyone know how long it was before he left us?

As stated, one story is Gartside didn't want the club to get dragged through the dirt. Seeing as it's quite clear Allardyce cares not a jot about our club, did he have enough time left after he left?

Fair enough. There's sense in that law.

Before I make my own conclusions about that man, does anyone know how long it was before he left us?

As stated, one story is Gartside didn't want the club to get dragged through the dirt. Seeing as it's quite clear Allardyce cares not a jot about our club, did he have enough time left after he left?

 

 

Panarama was Sept, he left in April. 4/5 months left when he went.

Panarama was Sept, he left in April. 4/5 months left when he went.

Thank you.

Right, I've made my conclusions about the whole affair now and, shame on him for darkening BWFC's name.

Let him rot in the North East, that, surely is punishment enough.

Case closed!

allardyce would probably have cleared his name in court

 

but only at the expense of daddys little soldier

 

thats why it went quiet

allardyce would probably have cleared his name in court

 

but only at the expense of daddys little soldier

 

thats why it went quiet

 

for what its worth, I agree.

Allardyce didn't sue, simply because his advisors suggested thet it would be difficult to dispute the truth in an open court.