noticed a big headline on front page of star today about coolio rape shock.

 

so on my dinner i had a quick searh and found this...

 

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/6581...oolio-cover-up/

 

"I've never raped a woman ... I?ve never had to."

 

have i missed something here???? are they accusing him of NOT raping someone???

Edited January 15, 200917 yr by HomerJay

Most of us have never felt the urge, let alone the need.

 

But there be the difference with those who could still live in caves and up trees.

I find his comment rather ignorant of what lies behind rape.

'ive never had to'

meaning, i get plenty of sex/ nobody says no to me anyway/women throw themselves at me.

Yeah fair enough.

But is he actually stupid enough to believe that rapists are always those who get sex from nowhere else?

Theyre often in sexually active relationships.

And any bloke wanting sex can have it, even if it means he has to pay for it.

Rape is not about orgasm.

Its about power/control/abuse.

 

Mini rant over!

dont get me wrong im not defending him in any way, shape or form.

 

but the is a huge difference between a being a alleged rapist and just basically thick as pigshit.

 

i just feel the papers write some utter shite they really should be going anywhere near without actual fact.

dont get me wrong im not defending him in any way, shape or form.

 

but the is a huge difference between a being a alleged rapist and just basically thick as pigshit.

 

i just feel the papers write some utter shite they really should be going anywhere near without actual fact.

 

That is what papers do in these days

dont get me wrong im not defending him in any way, shape or form.

 

but the is a huge difference between a being a alleged rapist and just basically thick as pigshit. That is no defence. As my synchronised friend says, to have the attitude, "I don't need to" means he has no concept of what rape actually is and also clearly to respect for wimmin, so so hopefully he might not get laid quite as much now that's been publicised .

 

i just feel the papers write some utter shite they really should be going anywhere near without actual fact. I agree BUT

 

 

The thing is, the guy willing went on a tv programme where he knew he would be scrutinised for everything he has ever said or done, due to the press being idiots and the idiotic public loving it (I'm not not sure what came first tbh). Therefore if he, or any of the other "stars" (I don't really know who's in other than Ulrika as I was told this) complain about press coverage when they come out, they want putting in the stocks and rotten veg throwing at them.

what do you expect from someone who's spent most his life living in a gangsta's paradise

 

also, in that song he said "i'm 23 now will i live to see 24"

 

that were in 95

 

that article says he's 45

 

so someone is lying

 

having thought about it my money is on coolio

Anyone else not shocked if this were true?

 

Come on he live's in a gangsters paradise. They raped 'hoes' all day long there.

Anyone else not shocked if this were true?

 

Come on he live's in a gangsters paradise. They raped 'hoes' all day long there.

 

 

Why are they all calling brasses hoes on this show.. Im english not american , in my book a hoe is a garden tool

love how the Star has the "Rape" article with a big-titted bimbo in skimpy attire as the accompanying photo.

 

wonder if newspapers round the world are as comic book as ours?

love how the Star has the "Rape" article with a big-titted bimbo in skimpy attire as the accompanying photo.

 

wonder if newspapers round the world are as comic book as ours?

 

I havn't seen the article Smiley, but, if they are running a rape story alongside a sexually exciting provocative picture the they want shooting the utter stupid c*ckends. That just reinforces the 'they were asking for it' stereotype.

 

If the pic is of the woman who has made the allegations then she wants her fookin head knocking off for having that pic in the paper.

 

I really, really cannot see how any woman who had been through a tyraumatic rape would present that image of herself to the world. Yes, run the story, give up identity to speak out, but a pic like that? Get fooking real.

 

The world is full of idiots.

I havn't seen the article Smiley, but, if they are running a rape story alongside a sexually exciting provocative picture the they want shooting the utter stupid c*ckends. That just reinforces the 'they were asking for it' stereotype.

 

If the pic is of the woman who has made the allegations then she wants her fookin head knocking off for having that pic in the paper.

 

I really, really cannot see how any woman who had been through a tyraumatic rape would present that image of herself to the world. Yes, run the story, give up identity to speak out, but a pic like that? Get fooking real.

 

The world is full of idiots.

 

It was the first message on this thread...

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/6581...oolio-cover-up/

 

Its Lucy Pinder - she's not been raped, but says Coolio made suggestive comments, etc, about violent sex, etc.

I saw that, the 'BB Rape Cover Up' seems to be that they didn't do show him saying he'd never raped anyone.

 

Gotta love the rediculousness of the papers over here, though it is slightly unnerving that a lot of people will take shite like that seriously.

Anyone else not shocked if this were true?

 

Come on he live's in a gangsters paradise. They raped 'hoes' all day long there.

Guilty the slimey scum he is