L/H White Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 inifselected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter barryk32 Posted October 17, 2013 Site Supporter Share Posted October 17, 2013 In. We are staying up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olispence Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Inifselected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Spaznob plus Spaznob's mate (LostockTerror) inifselected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matty Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 In Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olispence Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Two more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 IN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L/H White Posted October 18, 2013 Author Share Posted October 18, 2013 These have won 3 lost 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 If everyone is available, we need to go with the original 8 tbh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Some strange results the other night. Farnworth Reds who bummed us 21-10 the other week lost 8-3, and that gash team we raped last week narrowly lost 11-10. Fair point from Pabbers re selection. We'll be poorer for it though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter barryk32 Posted October 18, 2013 Site Supporter Share Posted October 18, 2013 I see what your saying, but, lostock terror has turned up every week since week two and what's more he has also paid every week since week two. That means he's played as many games as others and has put more in the pot. He's also now a member of WW's so for me heisin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Can we have 4 subs ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olispence Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 (edited) Or a rotation system? People would only miss one game in nine then. If someone isnt available one week then that can be their week out of the side. Edited October 18, 2013 by olispence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L/H White Posted October 18, 2013 Author Share Posted October 18, 2013 (edited) I see what your saying, but, lostock terror has turned up every week since week two and what's more he has also paid every week since week two. That means he's played as many games as others and has put more in the pot. He's also now a member of WW's so for me heisin. I fully agree with this. Can we have 4 subs ??? No, maximum is 8, we're only just managing with 3 subs, 2 is better in all honesty. Or a rotation system? People would only miss one game in nine then. If someone isnt available one week then that can be their week out of the side. A good idea Oliver. Edited October 18, 2013 by Ryan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter barryk32 Posted October 18, 2013 Site Supporter Share Posted October 18, 2013 That'll work. I'll miss this week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 (edited) I fully agree with this. No, maximum is 8, we're only just managing with 3 subs, 2 is better in all honesty. A good idea Oliver. I agree 2 is actually better than 3. They're short games as it is. With 3 subs then you end up with some playing less than half a game. Edit: Oh, and Baz, if there's one player who's MUST play each game, then that's you. Don't know what the solution is here though. Should we appoint someone to be in charge of team selection? I'd happily vote for someone and would be happy with their selections (well, maybe not always but I'd certainly never whinge about them ). Seeing as Baz kicked the whole thing off and got it going he'd get my vote Edited October 18, 2013 by DazBob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 When everyone is fit, I think its Daz's mate that should drop out, no offence to him, as he is belting player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 You could just keep it to Bolton fans only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 When everyone is fit, I think its Daz's mate that should drop out, no offence to him, as he is belting player. On the grounds that he's newest to the forum and not part of any quiche? Bit harsh that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter barryk32 Posted October 18, 2013 Site Supporter Share Posted October 18, 2013 A lot harsh. Lostock's as said above put more in than others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L/H White Posted October 18, 2013 Author Share Posted October 18, 2013 I agree 2 is actually better than 3. They're short games as it is. With 3 subs then you end up with some playing less than half a game. Yep, and with bringing 3 on at once, it completely changes the game, when we did it Wednesday, we conceded 3 in quick succession. The 2 on 2 off worked very well for us. The first time in wways history, with have to many committed players Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L/H White Posted October 18, 2013 Author Share Posted October 18, 2013 I think we should call an AGM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 On the grounds that he's newest to the forum and not part of any quiche? Bit harsh that. Not at all, just dont the fact that he was an "if needed" player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter barryk32 Posted October 18, 2013 Site Supporter Share Posted October 18, 2013 Was he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Im not sure we will have this problem though, bound to get drop outs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.