masi 51

I think you have it wrong. Any losses in year one can be paid out by the owners as long as we do not exceed 85% of our turnover on wages....Added to that the owners can put in 35m over three years above and beyond. I doubt FV will want to put in anywhere near that amount yet other owners will not baulk at that amount.

That is how i understand it. We rightly have to try and fund the club unless we have backers who do not mind losing money each year like most of the present day Championship......Some clubs can afford to lose 20-50m a season we certainly cannot as Sluffy pointed out, but these new rules are based on turnover and not losses

shit day, forget it pal alls good

So you posted on this thread and the rumours thread and offered nothing...ok

SCR is nothing about trading loss....It is about spending a maximum of 85% of turnover on wages plus a extra say 11m per season Teams like West Ham, Wolves etc will have both the biggest turnover and losses in the Championship so will be able to buy practically who they wish despite Massive losses each season

It was just a example....Ok if Stoke lose 50m they will still be able to spend 85% of turnover on wages. So our losses be they 5m or 14m have no bearing in what we can spend this season

I have glanced over the new SCR rules.....Glance being the operative rules. Seems a few on here have misunderstood them or have i??? The rules state we can spend up to 85% of our turnover plus a further 13m on wages for all staff.....It matters not how much we lose in that season. So we could lose 50m and still have a healthy budget.....Which will give teams like Stoke a huge advantage as it wont matter how much they lose they will budget to push all of that 85% to the limit

See us being way more direct than previous seasons...keeper will be knocking it long

Makes a mockery of the new financial fair play rules.....Preston will have no choice but to flip him in the next two seasons

Would be the best we could attract

Keeper on loan is the right way to go until Harrington is ready Keep bonham for the bench and loan the rest out

Hope it's Charles.Man City are on the verge of signing him

Being linked with Bim Pebble did well second half of last season at Plymouth

Time will tell, and Tutu did not stay injury free Granted nothing more serious than a knock. Johnston had one bad injury and played pretty much every game before and two seasons after the injury and Dempsey was used sparingly not sure he completed 90 mins. He has brought in two players who started about a dozen games between them and another Dozen from the bench......Why not bring one established player in is all i am asking Tuchall brought Saka, James and Stones to a month tournament pretty certain he never thought they would be crocks

jmjhb puts a point across that really has nothing to do with my question which was why have we signed two players in the same position that have never been effective in the last few seasons. We will need consistency next season and i do not believe these two can bring that. We could bring in Reece James and he would be the best full back in the league but your only going to get six games out of him all season. There is every chance by Oct/Nov our two centre backs will be Toal and Forino and our left back will be Conway because our two Left sided centre backs/LB are in the treatment room. Toal and Foirino also do not have the best injury records so we may have to throw Temple/Inwood in Surely people can see we need players who are going to be playing week in week out

Anybody else curious as to why we have brought in two left sided centre backs that were decent around 2021/22. Now some will take the view they are the best we can attract. If we combined their wages surely we could have brought in somebody who is above those two, much younger and would play 40 odd games......Not sure we are getting 40 games combined

I think Conway will have a great career [hopefully with us] It wont be at left back though

His days at left back are numbered.....Either as a wing/back or left sided midfielder is where Conway will play most of his career

No need for me to give my penny worth, me you and 90% of the man on the street know he has selected a awful squad and players who are carrying injuries.

All about opinions....Two or three i was impressed with last season. He was great in the play-offs but he is not championship quality but that is only my opinion

Bonham. Desmond and GT were excellent in the play-offs but are simply not Championship quality. Not sure we can stay up if Bonham is first choice next season. It is harsh but every player has levels......And we have four or five more that will struggle

Stephenson

You wont get no abuse from me. Why may you ask....because since you returned to this forum in the last month you have been wrong about everything you have commented on. You went out the way to tell me FV and the Swiss are the same people. One from each group are brothers and they are all on the same page but they are two groups. Then you went on about me being someone else....Not a clue where you got that from. You also said the same with another on here who said he had never been on the aptly named nuts. I knew that you would be wrong on this despite me not fully understanding what you was on about. Auditors do not sign a 20m black hole away Chill out its a football forum, maybe you might get something right before the season starts, but abuse that is not my style.

The lad at Hull seems to be a carbon copy of Ben Davies and has been in and around lge1/Championship for a good few years. Conways playing time next season seems limited. The forward from France seems a roll of the dice and could be anything, we could get 10m for him next season or he could flop......These are the gambles the club needs and if he can get Kenny in on the last day i will be more than happy with the way the club is heading.

Told you your abicas was broken.........wrong year old chap