I think so, or maybe a draw at best. So maybe we're making progess already.

How can anyone possibly know?

Can you not re-enact is on FIFA 2013 to find out what would happen?

How can anyone possibly know?

 

Considering how shit all the players are, surely the answer is yes?

Considering how shit all the players are, surely the answer is yes?

 

Eagles, Lee, M.Davies and Petrov ain't shite?

Does it really matter tbf?

Would we have lost it under Megson?

 

Would we have lost it under Lee?

 

Would we have lost it under Neal?

 

 

Who really cares or knows?

 

 

Eagles, Lee, M.Davies and Petrov ain't shite?

 

Whooooooosh

you said Pratley wasn't shite (terrible) earlier, so don't get all whooshy, I doubt you'd have changed your mind in a hour or so, good for you for trying to be a little different than boring Homer though.

Edited November 3, 201213 yr by Didledee

If my Aunty grew a penis, would she be my Uncle?

If my Aunty grew a penis, would she be my Uncle?

 

This.

How can anyone possibly know?

 

 

true

 

 

but, as a guess, probably

How can anyone possibly know?

 

Strikes me that the op just means "do we look more resilient (and moe likely to come back if we go behind) now Coyle has gone?". Could be wrong, but if that's what was meant the answer is yes, we do.

Yes

Imo yes . Skd would not have been subbed , petrov would have come on at

70-75 minutes . Refreshing attitude to subs ie use them to.win a game !!!

If my Aunty grew a penis, would she be my Uncle?

 

+1

Yes I believe we would of lost under clueless coyle

Yes. There would have been no confidence and going one behind would surely have become two behind. The crowd would have been in fine form. Nobody wanting the ball, the continuing boot up to the ever-present SKD, WWays down by 7.30.

Yes, it would have been two or three one to the top o' the league..