Gonk Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Of that there is no doubt. I met him in Fanzone and he came across as being genuine in his venture to capture BWSA for the supporters and away from the werthers suckers. I told him I'd consider joining BWSA as and when it became a true reflection of the real supporters of BWFC rather than a dreary little group of people who wore at least 30 badges on each lapel of their sports coats. He never came back and reported on his success/failure. Howsabout we do it then? All it needs is more of us than them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Howsabout we do it then? All it needs is more of us than them The powers-that-be read this shit, we needn't bother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Fuck SKY anyway. I've had enough press exposure for one year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tylswhite Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 Sadly, yes. I'm not really keen on fans being interviewed on SKY, but I don't ever want the BWSA to speak for me. I explained who I was/we were and they said they preferred to speak with an "official organisation". I told them about how many members we had: they said they'd check us out and possibly come back to me! We'll not hear from them, once they've checked us out! And I was all set to go "global" wearing a Nat Lofthouse t-shirt! So thats why whenever Bolton fans get interviewed they make us look like twats. We are gonna get another 2nd rate manager arent we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Thomas Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 Sadly, yes. I'm not really keen on fans being interviewed on SKY, but I don't ever want the BWSA to speak for me. I explained who I was/we were and they said they preferred to speak with an "official organisation". I told them about how many members we had: they said they'd check us out and possibly come back to me! We'll not hear from them, once they've checked us out! And I was all set to go "global" wearing a Nat Lofthouse t-shirt! Happy New Year Traf. John Thomas aka OllyReedHangover wishes you a good un. Why wouldn't anyone seek the views of a non official organisation is beyond me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted January 1, 2010 Site Supporter Share Posted January 1, 2010 Maybe they think anything 'unofficial' is beyond reproach if Traf goes on and starts effin and jeffin to camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 Maybe they think anything 'unofficial' is beyond reproach if Traf goes on and starts effin and jeffin to camera. I'm an educated man, and I know what kind of language is fucking appropriate. :: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no balls Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 I'd have done it. I'm local, can scrub pretty well (apparently) & as you all know, my diplomatic skills are excellent as well as my command of the English language! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 I think most on here could have done a job; as long as they don't ask for views on refs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underpants Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 Sadly, yes. I'm not really keen on fans being interviewed on SKY, but I don't ever want the BWSA to speak for me. I explained who I was/we were and they said they preferred to speak with an "official organisation". I told them about how many members we had: they said they'd check us out and possibly come back to me! We'll not hear from them, once they've checked us out! And I was all set to go "global" wearing a Nat Lofthouse t-shirt! I may be wrong but I'm sure they've had that KUMB lot from West Ham on . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 I may be wrong but I'm sure they've had that KUMB lot from West Ham on . They probably have, but they preferred the official mob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no balls Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 I may be wrong but I'm sure they've had that KUMB lot from West Ham on . They won the World cup & they're Southerners, different rules I think Undies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted January 1, 2010 Site Supporter Share Posted January 1, 2010 I'm an educated man, and I know what kind of language is fucking appropriate. :::: It'd be like the flag all over again! Traf, if you get on please could you try and say Clackervalve or offer your opinion on the referee for Saturday! SSN - So, there we have Traf from WW giving his opinion on Megson's sacking. One final thing, what about the ref you've got on Saturday? Traf - He's a . . . he's a . . . he's . . . actually, I'd prefer not to comment on that if you don't mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 The actual answer would be: "I don't think he's any better or any worse than the others. They all possess similar qualities." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no balls Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 The actual answer would be: "I don't think he's any better or any worse than the others. They all possess similar qualities." And I'd play the part of the token nobhead in the background, shouting "He's a cunt!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 You'd probably have to dress down for the occasion or borrow some apparel from your former employer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rembrandt Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 The actual answer would be: "I don't think he's any better or any worse than the others. They all possess similar qualities." Not challenging your command of English, Traf, but the word you're looking for might be 'characteristics'. 'qualities' is far too positive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted January 1, 2010 Share Posted January 1, 2010 A quality (derived from Latin: qualitas is an attribute. It can be negative & positive. Obviously I'd be using it in a negative way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts