Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Does He Deserve To Be Fired


Casino

Does he desreve to go  

186 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I think he's lost the players respect.

 

No way back.

 

From where I was sat yesterday he seemed to be barking his touchline nonsense to no one in particular. The only flicker of recognition seemed to be coming from NRC who seemed to be telling him to calm down (saw the same against Arsenal). Hard to say for certain that this is the case but it does look like he's lost a lot of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I think he's lost the players respect.

 

No way back.

 

Reading between the lines and putting 2 and 2 together to get 22. I guess that the players were expecting 4-5-1 and NRC as captain, even if Muamba turning up late wasnt the reason for the change, their half arsed performances yesterday were down to the fact they knew they were playing in a way that wasn't going to work, Wigan soon sussed this out and were well up for it

 

Can't be arsed voting either way, as I expect a landslide but it won't make any difference, as in, he would appear to be going nowhere as it were, so we just accept it and hope for the best and 4-5-1

Edited by ZicoKelly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Davies is club captain so if he plays he's captain.

 

NRC knew that when he took over as vice captain once Cahill left.

 

If Nigel got the hump because of it then perhaps Garrp was right.

 

I wasn't on about NRC in particular getting the hump, more the players seeing coyle regressing back to a formation/system proven not work and being disheartened

 

If every man and his dog lost their enthusiasm upon seeing the team sheet it wouldn't surprise me if one or two players did either

 

(cue a response of "but they're highly paid pros etc etc", I know, but they can still get as fucked off as we all did)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We beat Wigan earlier in the season without Muamba and a midfield/attack comprising Eagles,Petrov,Reo-coker,Pratley,Ngog and Kevin Davies.

The only change from when we beat Wigan is Mark Davies for Pratley yet Coyle should be sacked.It makes you laugh.

 

It'll be "We're on the march with Owen's army " next week if we win at Millwall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

We beat Wigan earlier in the season without Muamba and a midfield/attack comprising Eagles,Petrov,Reo-coker,Pratley,Ngog and Kevin Davies.

The only change from when we beat Wigan is Mark Davies for Pratley yet Coyle should be sacked.It makes you laugh.

 

It'll be "We're on the march with Owen's army " next week if we win at Millwall.

 

I hope Owen wasn't thinking about what happened when we last played Wigan, 5 months ago, when deciding who to play and in what formation, I'd have hoped he looked back on more recent games/performances, you know, like Liverpool, arsenal and what happened last 30 or so v norwich when we went 4-4-2, but you maybe onto something here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We beat Wigan earlier in the season without Muamba and a midfield/attack comprising Eagles,Petrov,Reo-coker,Pratley,Ngog and Kevin Davies.

The only change from when we beat Wigan is Mark Davies for Pratley yet Coyle should be sacked.It makes you laugh.

 

It'll be "We're on the march with Owen's army " next week if we win at Millwall.

 

We beat liverpool and got a point against arsenal playing 451 only the other week.

 

Which is the more relevant result?

 

the one months ago against a different wiggin side or the good results recent weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Owen wasn't thinking about what happened when we last played Wigan, 5 months ago, when deciding who to play and in what formation, I'd have hoped he looked back on more recent games/performances, you know, like Liverpool, arsenal and what happened last 30 or so v norwich when we went 4-4-2, but you maybe onto something here

 

beat me to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost as clever as asking whether playing the same opposition is more relevant than playing different opposition.

no you plant pot, i was asking whether a game months ago was more relevant than a game only a week or so ago.

 

You can carry on in your blind faith of coyle, and to be honest in recent weeks i thought he'd turned a corner and finally come to understand what was needed in this relegation battle, but he's proven again why he's not the right man for the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we'd played 4-5-1 at home to Wigan yesterday and drawn 0-0, the same people would have been on here asking why he was so negative when points were there for the taking.

 

 

It has been pointed out many times that 4-5-1 with two attacking wingers and an attacking CM is not a negative formation. They key to our recent (relative) success being two holding midfielders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.