Donald Dead Cat On Is Head Trump

[Zico]

11 minutes ago, royal white said:

So change the location to a New York house and I’m The Don. 
 

Why now should he be charged? 

did Don meet the girls in a strip club and invite them back to his and pay them directly?

if so, nothing

or did he arrange it with the owner of the strip club?

if it's the latter, he'd get charged with a sexual offence of soliciting sexual services

[royal white]

Just now, Zico said:

did Don meet the girls in a strip club and invite them back to his and pay them directly?

if so, nothing

or did he arrange it with the owner of the strip club?

if it's the latter, he'd get charged with a sexual offence of paying for soliciting sexual services

He was invited to a party, girls were also invited to a party. At no time Has he paid for anything. 
 

What’s he charged with? 

[Zico]

2 minutes ago, royal white said:

He was invited to a party, girls were also invited to a party. At no time Has he paid for anything. 
 

What’s he charged with? 

nothing

what you have just descirbed is getting laid at a party

but if, as you suggested earlier, they were aware a fee is being paid for the girls to be there and sleep with them, then you would charged with solicitation

[bolty58]

6 minutes ago, royal white said:

He was invited to a party, girls were also invited to a party. At no time Has he paid for anything. 
 

What’s he charged with? 

As always, your 'sticktoitiveness' is admirable.

The haters will just pile it on even more thickly ('thickly' being the operative word) because it is all they can do. Try and bring him down with unfounded innuendo or unproven accusation - basically doing the puppet masters (Democrats) gutter politics work. Of course they will fail and have to wrestle daily with the prospect of over 1,000 more days of top Trumps.

I remain amused with the haters disgusting bile. In the main, they are the type of folk who lap up the glib mottos and mantras of various virtue signalling sports entities around the world like 'End Hate' (good luck with that one) etc. and yet spew out their hate with gay abandon. The very definition of hypocrisy.

[royal white]

5 minutes ago, Zico said:

nothing

what you have just descirbed is getting laid at a party

but if, as you suggested earlier, they were aware a fee is being paid for the girls to be there and sleep with them, then you would charged with solicitation

They probably knew a fee was paid for them to be there. Like I knew money had been paid for the strippers to be at the party i went too. 

 

So no charges then. Good, so Hopefully those who were asking about charges a few pages back might now realise there’s fuck all to charge a lot of them on. And as for @boltonboris who thinks people who go to parties for birds are automatically traffickers and nonces 😆 I bet you’re shit hot at musical Chairs and a right jelly and cream connoisseur 

[Zico]

2 minutes ago, royal white said:

They probably knew a fee was paid for them to be there. Like I knew money had been paid for the strippers to be at the party i went too. 

 

So no charges then. Good, so Hopefully those who were asking about charges a few pages back might now realise there’s fuck all to charge a lot of them on. And as for @boltonboris who thinks people who go to parties for birds are automatically traffickers and nonces 😆 I bet you’re shit hot at musical Chairs and a right jelly and cream connoisseur 

not quite, there's one other thing you need to consider

could the girls at your party or don's party turn you down if they wanted to, because they didn't fancy you? 

or did you pay the owner of long legs for them to come and have sex with you?

the point you seem to be missing is whether or not the girls are being coerced into having sex with someone by a pimp

do you think Prince Andrew, Trump or whoever just thought they got lucky, or that they knew the girls were there to have sex with him, because Esptein had arranged it?

[royal white]

15 minutes ago, Zico said:

not quite, there's one other thing you need to consider

could the girls at your party or don's party turn you down if they wanted to, because they didn't fancy you? 

or did you pay the owner of long legs for them to come and have sex with you?

the point you seem to be missing is whether or not the girls are being coerced into having sex with someone by a pimp

do you think Prince Andrew, Trump or whoever just thought they got lucky, or that they knew the girls were there to have sex with him, because Esptein had arranged it?

Do you honestly think a prince and a billionaire are going to struggle to get laid? I’m sure they’ve been to 100s of parties where women have thrown themselves at them. I’m guessing you know this .

They could only turn me down if I made a move for them. That would be the same for The Don. 

The point you seem to be missing is there’s fuck all kind of evidence out there at the moment, well there’s one witness said she don’t see Trump involved. Which doesn’t suit the narrative of middled aged footy fans 1000s of miles away .

[Zico]

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

Do you honestly think a prince and a billionaire are going to struggle to get laid? I’m sure they’ve been to 100s of parties where women have thrown themselves at them. I’m guessing you know this .

They could only turn me down if I made a move for them. That would be the same for The Don. 

The point you seem to be missing is there’s fuck all kind of evidence out there at the moment, well there’s one witness said she don’t see Trump involved. Which doesn’t suit the narrative of middled aged footy fans 1000s of miles away .

if you think that Don, or whoever, knew that girls who were at the parties had been paid to be there and were to have sex with the men at the parties, then they can be charged, simple as that

if you think that Epstein touted these parties as "there'll be loads of birds there, but can't promise anything, just see how you get on", and it was more like your party with the strippers, where you had to try your luck, and they were able to say no thanks, then no, no charges

i reckon they all knew, you even said so yourself

it's just proving they knew which is difficult

maybe there'll be something in the files

 

[royal white]

6 minutes ago, Zico said:

if you think that Don, or whoever, knew that girls who were at the parties had been paid to be there and were to have sex with the men at the parties, then they can be charged, simple as that

if you think that Epstein touted these parties as "there'll be loads of birds there, but can't promise anything, just see how you get on", and it was more like your party with the strippers, where you had to try your luck, and they were able to say no thanks, then no, no charges

i reckon they all knew, you even said so yourself

it's just proving they knew which is difficult

maybe there'll be something in the files

 

I didn’t mention sex. I said they probably knew they’d been paid to be there. Lamine yamal paid for people to be at his party not long back. Can anyone prove it was for sex? 
 

So off everything you know so far, the millions of files, the witness statements, e mails etc etc etc. What are they charging him with?

[green genie]

2 hours ago, royal white said:

Late 90s I go back to a United players mates house. We had all been to a strip bar in Manchester, sure it was long legs. Said United player is dating one of the dancers, and he pays for loads of her mates to come back to the gaff. Me and my mate give one of the birds the best 4 mins of her life. 
 

What do I get charged with? 

Being a pinko and a nonce if she was underage.

[Zico]

1 hour ago, royal white said:

I didn’t mention sex. I said they probably knew they’d been paid to be there. Lamine yamal paid for people to be at his party not long back. Can anyone prove it was for sex? 
 

So off everything you know so far, the millions of files, the witness statements, e mails etc etc etc. What are they charging him with?

Trump? nothing yet

though we were talking in general about the guests at his island and parties

will have to see what comes of these latest files releases

they contain all sorts of accusations against him such as:

Trump allegedly "auctioned" these minors to attendees and also had a bizarre method of valuing each of them.

"He measured the children's vulva and v-ginas by entering a finger and rated the children on tightness," the doc alleged.

but the DOJ have said you can ignore the accusations in the files about Trump, they aren't true

so nothing will probably come of them

what they do confirm is that Trump flew on Epstein's private jet 8 times, whilst previously Trump said he'd never been on his plane

you know what they called his plane?

Lolita Express

funny that

anyway, it all certainly doesn't compare to the time you shagged a stripper

[royal white]

24 minutes ago, Zico said:

Trump? nothing yet

though we were talking in general about the guests at his island and parties

will have to see what comes of these latest files releases

they contain all sorts of accusations against him such as:

Trump allegedly "auctioned" these minors to attendees and also had a bizarre method of valuing each of them.

"He measured the children's vulva and v-ginas by entering a finger and rated the children on tightness," the doc alleged.

but the DOJ have said you can ignore the accusations in the files about Trump, they aren't true

so nothing will probably come of them

what they do confirm is that Trump flew on Epstein's private jet 8 times, whilst previously Trump said he'd never been on his plane

you know what they called his plane?

Lolita Express

funny that

anyway, it all certainly doesn't compare to the time you shagged a stripper

Finally we got there! Just before bed time, perfect.

 

 

 

[little whitt]

Never new that 

MANDESON  was a 

Queer 

[Bertie]

Interesting overnight exchanges.

Let’s face it, unless the DoJ/FBI release all the pages with no redactions, then it’s all about who we give the benefit of the doubt to. Two on here seem happy to trust Trump (despite him being bent as a ten bob note - you know he lies when he opens his mouth). The rest don’t. Personally I’m giving the benefit of the doubt to Epstein’s victims. 

[Spider]

It’s all just starting to unravel for that big sweaty orange peadophile isn’t it?

[Zico]

1 hour ago, royal white said:

Finally we got there! Just before bed time, perfect.

 

 

 

Aye he probably won't get charged with anything 

Just like Andrew didn't

Really it'll just come down to whether or not you think there's anything in the allegations 

[Spider]

Away from his rampant peadophilia

He’s now having his pants pulled down by chi-nahh (man nappy and all)

A small election in Texas that he openly supported the GOP candidate for was lost to the Dems and now he’s claiming he knew nothing about it 🤣

He still hasn’t dished out those $2k cheques and even the MAGA’s are starting to ask when he will.

And he openly shat himself at the Oval Office.

whaddaguy.

(and he nonces children but that doesn’t seem to bother many fans)

[Bertie]

….and he’s announced the Kennedy Center is shutting for 2 years for (no doubt chintzy) renovations. Nothing to do with all the artists cancelling performances there of course since he renamed it. Sad.

[bolty58]

1 hour ago, Bertie said:

Interesting overnight exchanges.

Let’s face it, unless the DoJ/FBI release all the pages with no redactions, then it’s all about who we give the benefit of the doubt to. Two on here seem happy to trust Trump (despite him being bent as a ten bob note - you know he lies when he opens his mouth). The rest don’t. Personally I’m giving the benefit of the doubt to Epstein’s victims. 

May have been more appropriate to use the word 'purchases' rather than 'victims'. Some now sense an even bigger payday with the help of ambulance chasing type lawyers.

You needn't have said where your benefit of the doubt would be placed. Anything which can be remotely considered anti Trump. We get it.

[bolty58]

56 minutes ago, Zico said:

Aye he probably won't get charged with anything 

Just like Andrew didn't

Really it'll just come down to whether or not you hate The Don so deeply that you'd have him done for the Bataclan attack, the Great Train Robbery and Brinks Mat. Logic and rationale don't come into it.

 

[Dimron]

9 hours ago, bolty58 said:

You'd lose your fucking bet! 

The whale shark teeth are enough to put me off.

Put a bag over her head and think of Farage😵‍💫

[Not in Crawley]

3 hours ago, Spider said:

Away from his rampant peadophilia

He’s now having his pants pulled down by chi-nahh (man nappy and all)

A small election in Texas that he openly supported the GOP candidate for was lost to the Dems and now he’s claiming he knew nothing about it 🤣

He still hasn’t dished out those $2k cheques and even the MAGA’s are starting to ask when he will.

And he openly shat himself at the Oval Office.

whaddaguy.

(and he nonces children but that doesn’t seem to bother many fans)

Away from the tawdry scandal - he's having a nightmare politically as well.

https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker/?app=core&utm_medium=cpc.adword.pd&utm_source=google&ppccampaignID=18156330227&ppcadID=&utm_campaign=a.22brand_pmax&utm_content=conversion.direct-response.anonymous&gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=18156330848&gbraid=0AAAAADBuq3IC3LzNb066X22gSKzLFvkXI&gclid=CjwKCAiAs4HMBhBJEiwACrfNZRrSOz1KdKx74e6k32jgLKMX_ruVRAFoyEZU9MRToKYxcCEbdV0w7BoC44sQAvD_BwE

 

[Sweep]

8 hours ago, royal white said:

Late 90s I go back to a United players mates house. We had all been to a strip bar in Manchester, sure it was long legs. Said United player is dating one of the dancers, and he pays for loads of her mates to come back to the gaff. Me and my mate give one of the birds the best 4 mins of her life. 
 

What do I get charged with? 

Handling Swollen Goods?

Edited February 2 by Sweep

[boltonboris]

12 hours ago, royal white said:

There’s not one scarp of evidence that says he went to the island. Nothing. No flight log, no photos, no witnesses. 
 

So where do you get your million per cent from? 

He was listed on at least 8 flight logs between 1993 and 1996

[Ani]

4 hours ago, bolty58 said:

May have been more appropriate to use the word 'purchases' rather than 'victims'. Some now sense an even bigger payday with the help of ambulance chasing type lawyers.

You needn't have said where your benefit of the doubt would be placed. Anything which can be remotely considered anti Trump. We get it.

Pedantry again ! 
 

Let’s point fingers at the victims, accusing them of exploiting the situation.