Donald Dead Cat On Is Head Trump

[Ani]

23 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

Just think that after all these redacted files and photos etc there is only one person in jail and that is a woman. The peado fella killed himself despite being on 24hr watch in custody. He had a massive string of evidence against him that was also used to convict Maxwell.

Yet no fucker else is involved? Really?

There are still loads not released, not that it matters as what has been is fucking useless unless it is a useful distraction for some.

The disgrace is people still being more worried about the impact on their respective political parties than what has actually happened. This applies to both parties over there.

Add on some very rich people across the world will have plenty of skeletons they want to keep well truly hidden and you can bet the full picture will never come out.

Trump as POTUS is most in the firing line and the reluctance to open up the files and the fact he moved Maxwell into a luxury prison ain’t helping his case. The fact he was friends with Epstein back in the day applies to hundreds of others so imo does not mean a lot on its own.  

[jayjayoghani]

Private Eye, 2011

 

[mickbrown]

9 minutes ago, royal white said:

She wasn’t raped and he wasn’t found guilty of rape. You’re another that’s has fallen for the silly lies. 

Technicality

‘Judge Kaplan found that Trump did rape her as the term is understood "in common modern parlance",[49] although not “in the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law”.’

And it still cost him 90 million dollars. 
 

 

[kent_white]

6 minutes ago, royal white said:

Steady on! Have you seen some of the sentences handed out over here lately? And wasn’t Mandleson employed by Labour even though it was known he was friendly with Epstein.

Yeah. Apparently Keir Starmer had a one to one with him before his appointment to ask whether he had had any contact with JE after his conviction. And was assured by PR that he hadn't. 

I genuinely can't think of anybody who has fallen foul in the US so far - apart from Epstein and his Mrs. Everyone seems to have got away with it scot free over there. 

[royal white]

4 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Yeah. Apparently Keir Starmer had a one to one with him before his appointment to ask whether he had had any contact with JE after his conviction. And was assured by PR that he hadn't. 

I genuinely can't think of anybody who has fallen foul in the US so far - apart from Epstein and his Mrs. Everyone seems to have got away with it scot free over there. 

Andrew was clearly seen taking the piss today. Apparently he purposely took his horse where he knew he would be photographed on the grounds of a house he should have already left. The necky fucker 

Edited February 3 by royal white

[Zico]

17 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Listen. I'll let you guess whether or not I'd let Donald Trump babysit my kids 😁

I know what kind of 'man' he is. He's a spoilt little bully, surrounded by sycophants. With an extremely questionable moral compass (at best) - and psychotic/narcissistic overtones at worst.

I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. I think he's an absolutely horrendous human being. 

I've just not seen anything from the files that makes me conclude he's a weapons grade nonce. Although - I'd put the probability of him engaging in that kind of behaviour as quite high. 

Just no proof.... And he's pretty much got the DOJ and FBI under instruction. So it's down to this judge I was speaking about earlier. 

I have to say though - I'm glad to see the UK still has an understanding of right and wrong. And that people like Mandleson and Andrew have been shunned. The US could learn from us for once! 

just to be clear

when I say nonce I mean sex offender, I don't mean underage kids

I've not really seen anything to suggest that was his thing, he even once commented on how Epstein liked them young, as if even he wouldn't go there, I think his thing is adult women, I think he thinks he can have any he wants one way or another

he was ordered to pay someone £5M for sexual assuault

that's my starting point

everything else just follows on from there in terms of what he says, does and is accused of

[Spider]

14 minutes ago, royal white said:

Andrew was clearly seen taking the piss today. Apparently he purposely took his horse where he knew he would be photographed on the grounds of a house he should have already left. The necky fucker 

As any innocent man should.

He has been found guilty of the following so far:

1. Nowt

2. Nish

3. Nada

 

[royal white]

9 minutes ago, Spider said:

As any innocent man should.

He has been found guilty of the following so far:

1. Nowt

2. Nish

3. Nada

 

Good point however he has been kicked out of his tax payer funded house and has yet to leave so he should be found guilty of trespassing or something along those lines. 

[kent_white]

37 minutes ago, Zico said:

just to be clear

when I say nonce I mean sex offender, I don't mean underage kids

I've not really seen anything to suggest that was his thing, he even once commented on how Epstein liked them young, as if even he wouldn't go there, I think his thing is adult women, I think he thinks he can have any he wants one way or another

he was ordered to pay someone £5M for sexual assuault

that's my starting point

everything else just follows on from there in terms of what he says, does and is accused of

Ah OK - I see what you mean. I thought you were more about him being a paedo! 

Yeah I agree - he's an entitled little brat and it amazes me that people idolise him. 

He's like that fat annoying kid from Willy Wonka. 

[bolty58]

17 hours ago, Ani said:

So 17 year old girls being flown about to meet up with 40-50 year old blokes and Princes is ok.

 

If the law says so? Does it?

Edited February 4 by bolty58

[bolty58]

17 hours ago, Ani said:

‘Not defending in any way……but….’ 

 

Oh do fuck off.

You'll be rolling out "I've got a black friend" next.

[bolty58]

16 hours ago, wakey said:

If you've done nowt wrong and can afford the legal fees, why the fuck would you pay someone off.

Only logical reasons for a pay off

1. you did it

2. you didn't do it but you're worried that other shit you've done will come to light

3. it's significantly cheaper to pay them off than the legal costs.

Feel free to add any I've missed.

4. The negative publicity is crucifying my reputation/business/family. I've got pots of money, let's just make this go away.

Feel free to add anything I haven't.

[bolty58]

11 hours ago, mickbrown said:

Walks like a duck, sounds like a duck……..

...fucks like a rabbit?

[bolty58]

4 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

Why anyone would defend any of this is beyond me

 

Defend what? The constant barrage of shit being thrown in the vain hope that some will stick? If that's what you meant then I am with you. Brother.

[bolty58]

4 hours ago, mickbrown said:

Technicality

‘Judge Kaplan found that Trump did rape her as the term is understood "in common modern parlance",[49] although not “in the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law”.’

And it still cost him 90 million dollars. 
 

 

Chump change.

[Bertie]

No empathy. No contrition. No soul. He really is a repulsive sociopath.

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/03/politics/video/president-trump-kaitlan-collins-epstein-vrtc

 

[London Wanderer]

5 minutes ago, Bertie said:

No empathy. No contrition. No soul. He really is a repulsive sociopath.

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/03/politics/video/president-trump-kaitlan-collins-epstein-vrtc

 

“Victims are criticising the scale of the redactions & that whole interviews have been blacked out”

Trump - “Do you know, you’re a young woman & I’ve never seen you smile”

 He’s just a vile scum bag isn’t he. Creepy as fuck.

 Been hilarious watching RW make an absolute tit out of himself trying to defend him on this. 

[royal white]

3 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

“Victims are criticising the scale of the redactions & that whole interviews have been blacked out”

Trump - “Do you know, you’re a young woman & I’ve never seen you smile”

 He’s just a vile scum bag isn’t he. Creepy as fuck.

 Been hilarious watching RW make an absolute tit out of himself trying to defend him on this. 

As @bolty58 said who’s defending? Everything I have said regarding Trump and these files has been true, feel free to prove me wrong. Yet there’s multiple people on here who have just made up their own version on the files. You’re a big spaz at times aren’t you fella.

[Bertie]

7 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

“Victims are criticising the scale of the redactions & that whole interviews have been blacked out”

Trump - “Do you know, you’re a young woman & I’ve never seen you smile”

 He’s just a vile scum bag isn’t he. Creepy as fuck.

 Been hilarious watching RW make an absolute tit out of himself trying to defend him on this. 

Yep. How anyone can vote for or defend this guy is beyond belief. He really does represent the dregs of humanity. Shows how thick and obnoxious 30% of Americans are.

Edited February 4 by Bertie

[royal white]

1 minute ago, Bertie said:

Yep. How anyone can defend this guy is beyond belief. He really does represent the dregs of humanity. Shows how thick and obnoxious 30% of Americans are.

Tory voter previously wasn’t you? 

[Bertie]

24 minutes ago, royal white said:

Tory voter previously wasn’t you? 

Correct - I was, and may be again.

Not sure what you’re getting at though? Even the Tories haven’t had anyone quite like Diaper Donnie at the helm (BoJo was the closest but at least he wasn’t thick).

[royal white]

Just now, Bertie said:

Correct - I was, and may be again.

Not sure what you’re getting at though? Even the Tories haven’t had anyone quite like Diaper Donnie at the helm (BoJo was the closest but at least he wasn’t thick).

A lot of people will see you as thick on here 👍

[Bertie]

That’s fine 😂. Wanderers will still bind us together!

For me in all honesty it’s about character type. I will disagree with many/most politicians, but that doesn’t mean I won’t respect them for their views and beliefs, as long as imho they are a decent human being and trying to do what they think is right.

Trump clearly doesn’t fall into this category. As didn’t Truss or BoJo. Or Farage. Imho. Corbyn was an interesting one for me. Couldn’t stand the man’s politics, and yet in a way I could see he was trying to do the best (as he thought) to make society fairer.

[royal white]

1 minute ago, Bertie said:

That’s fine 😂. Wanderers will still bind us together!

For me in all honesty it’s about character type. I will disagree with many/most politicians, but that doesn’t mean I won’t respect them for their views and beliefs, as long as imho they are a decent human being and trying to do what they think is right.

Trump clearly doesn’t fall into this category. As didn’t Truss or BoJo. Or Farage. Imho. Corbyn was an interesting one for me. Couldn’t stand the man’s politics, and yet in a way I could see he was trying to do the best (as he thought) to make society fairer.

And now you’ve gone beyond thick 😆

[Bertie]

13 minutes ago, royal white said:

And now you’ve gone beyond thick 😆

Knew I’d get hammered for that! To be clear though many/most of his views were also obnoxious (esp on Israel) and he would have been a complete disaster for the country. Hope that clears that up 😂.