Site Supporter MickyD Posted September 17, 2020 Site Supporter Share Posted September 17, 2020 Damned if you do, damned if you don’t! if the choice of bowler had been the same but successful, or if it had been different and successful, the skipper would’ve been praised. If a different bowler had been given the final over but bombed, skipper would get shit. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeep Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Not really. 99 times out of 100 a proper death bowler (T.Curran) would've been used to bowl final over. IMO Morgan was trying to be too clever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted September 17, 2020 Site Supporter Share Posted September 17, 2020 So you think Curran was guaranteed to bowl a last over without conceding the ten runs? Just having a better chance (in your opinion but not in the England Skipper’s) doesn’t mean much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeep Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 What I'm saying is that there is a reason why 99 times out 100 a death bowler is chosen to bowl the last over rather than a spinner, albeit a world class one. Hope that makes sense.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 17, 2020 Site Supporter Share Posted September 17, 2020 1 hour ago, MickyD said: Damned if you do, damned if you don’t! if the choice of bowler had been the same but successful, or if it had been different and successful, the skipper would’ve been praised. If a different bowler had been given the final over but bombed, skipper would get shit. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Not talking out of hindsight. I was listening and the intakes of breath and clearly surprised commentators suggested it was a massive gamble. Its also unusual to have a spinner bowl the last over, particularly one who hadn't had his best game. Whereas the death bowler from the previous game who did very well then, had also looked pretty decent in this one too. Of course, it could have worked, but it was a weird one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted September 17, 2020 Site Supporter Share Posted September 17, 2020 I don’t doubt it but what I’m saying is that the skipper must’ve thought a spinner would/could make sure Australia would be limited to singles. The first ball of that over going for a six was probably the point at which he wondered if he’d fucked up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted September 17, 2020 Site Supporter Share Posted September 17, 2020 18 minutes ago, MickyD said: I don’t doubt it but what I’m saying is that the skipper must’ve thought a spinner would/could make sure Australia would be limited to singles. The first ball of that over going for a six was probably the point at which he wondered if he’d fucked up. No doubt. Starc isn't averse to whacking the odd six neither. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boby Brno Posted November 11, 2020 Share Posted November 11, 2020 Should have been in Sydney today for the semi-final of the T20 World Cup. Ah well.🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.