fatolive

I’ve got one of them in my house… 10-2 position no longer recommended but driving with both hands on the steering wheel is in the Highway Code it says “ should” but also follows up with “ unless using cars assist systems “ and “ where possible “ I interpret that as changing gear / indicators and other assist systems on a steering wheel not a bottle of Lucozade sport after football training.

Just looked, didn’t know there was one in the old car park building on Crown St . might check that out for kids lessons

Yeh possibly , but used to work there and it wasn’t a bad spot until the road diverted any passing traffic past it to Whitefield or Bolton . rather than good, probably more accurate to say it wasn’t as bad as it is now , but then nowhere is I suppose.

Radcliffe got fucked up when they built Pilkington way to bypass it. it wasn’t a bad spot before then

The highest point on Earth is not the top of Mount Everest .

Yep, the order of distance from the sun is how it’s usually defined but due to the journey they’re on , in actual distance , Earth spends more time closer to mercury than any other planet . think I also read once that this is true for all planets and it’s due to Mercury being so close to the sun , every planet passes closer to it than others .

Mercury is the closest planet to Earth

Nobody born after 1935 has ever walked on the moon

That’s it. good way to end , make it look like you’re letting me off after proving your point 👍 done to death, have a good evening .

Lol ok mate . Don’t usually bother looking up stuff just to prove a point , I thought you might tell me. when you asked ,I said I’d not looked up the law but they seemed fair enough you think you’ve pulled some great stunt by the mentioning technicalities of criminal act , this is just a deflection because you’ve talked yourself into a corner and can’t answer any questions without contradicting your earlier position. The only facts I’m concerned with is that , as I said at the beginning, you don’t want to kill unborn kids , neither does he . you think he’s a fascist for wanting that position earlier than you . you’ve gone around the houses , contradicted yourself and complained a Parliamentarian discussing an existing law because you think it suits at present is fascist, like other suitable laws never get discussed or changed . At the end of the day , you also deny woman’s body autonomy, by the definition you set yourself , you called anyone that did this a fascist. you are going around in circles .

you ask a lot of questions and want peoples view but don’t answer questions yourself other than saying your views are irrelevant Couldn’t give a fuck now what he wants to be honest my point is he’s not a fascist for having a different view to you . he’s literally in the House of Parliament debating something, you want him to shut up and not say it , yet he’s the fascist ? you’ve stated denying women’s body autonomy is fascist . you yourself would deny that too after a certain point from what I’ve gathered . Not sure how it is a criminal act , but sure you’ve got some loophole comment , but you would still allow a woman to have it so that’s irrelevant too.

He’s talking himself around in circles as he’s realised that the only position he’s got is either fascist body autonomy denier or unborn children can be terminated at any time.

Never looked into them but not heard many complaints. certainly think it’s fair not to terminate for no reason after 23 weeks ( or whatever it is) if I had a choice I’d probably put it earlier, but medical advice and consent of law seems fair from what I know . Why do you ask ? do you not?

Not if you are calling someone a fascist for his they’re not, when, as I said, you have the same view but just at a different point in time. you would deny a woman bodily autonomy after a certain point or you agree to killing unborn children at any stage ( which I don’t think you do )

Yes I know I am I have , multiple times read the thread .. I don’t know again you’re allowed to say what your time limit is too but haven’t because it’ll prove your own stance wrong . his time limit could be anything from point of conception to to 24 weeks not sure how that changes the facts or what point you are making i would guess its earlier than yours as I’ve explained. you’re allowed to say you don’t understand

Yes , it involves another body . pregnancy is exactly that isn’t it? One body carrying another . Again, I’ll say, you have a time limit on when you think that is a true statement. ( you won’t admit it but you don’t really think women can make a choice to kill infants at 9months ) his time it should be classed as another body and a child is earlier than yours you both think unborn children shouldn’t be killed , just at different stages of pregnancy ,because , you have a different point in time when you consider it a child. if you do , as I suspect ,have a time limit, then you are against womens body autonomy after that point in time too you’re not a fascist and nether is he you just have different views

That’s exactly it. the debate is about when it stops being a clump if cells and becomes a human people have different views on that which is fair enough and medical advice states to a certain point cheese, despite his protestations on here will also have a point when he thinks it’s not ok , as it would result in killing a baby and he wouldn’t advocate that. hes just being stubborn as acknowledging that time limit, no matter when it is, will also put him in the bracket of “ denying woman’s bodily autonomy “ but as someone else said, this is always the case after a certain point in time, thinking that time should be different point because you believe it’s a child from earlier or later doesn’t make you a fascist .

You said a women has a right at any time earlier in the thread when I asked you what time limit you had and you didn’t have one I gave you the credit of not really wanting to kill unborn children but you inferred that you felt a woman has a choice over her body at any time . so if you do have I time limit, which I suspect you do, it’s different to this blokes, I suspect he’s earlier than both of us but given you won’t say yours, then I don’t know .

No one’s arguing against abortion, that’s your problem you are not reading it right. it’s the time that abortion is “ acceptable “ and the bloke in parliament thinks differently to most but still has a time, you don’t, you think it’s ok to abort at any time arguing that you shouldn’t kill an unborn child at 8 months isnt being a fucking fascist, that’s up there with the most stupid statement on this thread , and that takes some fucking doing, congratulations

Exactly. And men have the right to think this and it doesn’t mean they’re a fucking fascist for doing so.

Going to irrelevances now mate and I’m off for a swim you won’t answer the question but ask loads . If what you are saying is true then all government since 1967 have been fascists as they prevent women. “ doing what they like with their body “ after 24 weeks this bloke in parliament isn’t a fascist for having a different view to you

Asking a lot of questions for someone who won’t answer one and it’s irrelevant what I think , point is he’s not a fascist for having a different point of view to me. and as I stated before, twice, when the body inside her body becomes another being in law , but it’s not losing autonomy over her body, it’s the right to terminate that body that she loses . def takes longer than 30 seconds too

Could be that different from yours ? don’t think you can get pregnant so soon after ejaculation