take your bad attitude and fuck off

 

 

you must of argued with half the team yesterday

 

oh and you was at fault for their goal, you should of come off your line for it

agree on all points

 

he shouldn't be allowed to get away with shite

I'd rather they argued than drop their heads

 

Jussi was at fault for the goal though, along with ricketts

I'd rather they argued than drop their heads

 

Jussi was at fault for the goal though, along with ricketts

 

In the interests of balance having hammered robinson on a previous thread and seen MOTD he was badly at fault for the goal

Over the years I've admired Jussi for his goalkeeping ability but as a man I think he's a complete tosser.

Sticking 2 fingers up & telling his own fans to F off whilst he's playing is not acceptable.

Also been told by a friend who took his kids to a party that Jussi was at that he was pretty much cold & sort of

unaproachable.

Compare him with the Keepers we've had over the years, Felgate, Farnworth, Branigan all decent blokes

who had time for a chat or autographs.

So in short YES for me Jussi has got a bad attitude.

Happy new year

Yes, Ricketts was at fault for the goal, but he had a much better game than Robinson has had all season. I also didn't think we were going to concede every time they attacked. We looked a much better defensively than any other time this season, except perhaps at Blackburn until Alonso went off. With regard to Jussi, if he wasn't shouting at people some people would say he didn't care.

Over the years I've admired Jussi for his goalkeeping ability but as a man I think he's a complete tosser.

Sticking 2 fingers up & telling his own fans to F off whilst he's playing is not acceptable.

Also been told by a friend who took his kids to a party that Jussi was at that he was pretty much cold & sort of

unaproachable.

Compare him with the Keepers we've had over the years, Felgate, Farnworth, Branigan all decent blokes

who had time for a chat or autographs.

So in short YES for me Jussi has got a bad attitude.

Happy new year

 

Have we not learnt anything from the Megson/Coyle debate?

 

Couldn't give a fuck if Jussi is the biggest cunt in the world.

 

For the record, seen him in the Casino in Bolton twice and he was a good laugh and took some banter about doing his money on the roullette.

There were number of occaisions yesterday when we were passing it around , keeping a modicum of possession when we had to go back to the keeper. Every single time he just hoofed it long and we lost that possession we had. He is still living in the Big Sam long ball era. He cannot do anything else but put it long. He doesn't think to try an build again.

 

We need to get rid.

 

Not sure Bogdan is the answer. I suspect he will be broadly similar.

Edited January 1, 201214 yr by heywoodwhite

take your bad attitude and fuck off

 

 

you must of argued with half the team yesterday

 

oh and you was at fault for their goal, you should of come off your line for it

 

you need to move on mate, you are obsessed.

 

people are complaining that the players are showing no passion for the fight, Jussi at least showed he was bothered.

 

have you stopped demanding bogdan plays ?

There were number of occaisions yesterday when we were passing it around , keeping a modicum of possession when we had to go back to the keeper. Every single time he just hoofed it long and we lost that possession we had. He is still living in the Big Sam long ball era. He cannot do anything else but put it long. He doesn't think to try an build again.

 

We need to get rid.

 

Not sure Bogdan is the answer. I suspect he will be broadly similar.

 

right the outfield players knock it back to the keeper because there is fuck all movement and the keeper hoofs the ball and we blame the keeper, the ball went back to him because there was nothing else on, i think we should get glen hoddle in goal we need a keeper who can pick a pass.

Jussi showing some passion or Zat Knight having a laugh with the opposition as we are being played off the park?

The argument came when Knight shouted at Jussi for not coming for the ball. I'd let my keeper make the decision about whether or not to come out before I'd let one of our weakest defenders decide. Knight wanted a boot up his arse, never mind a bit of verbal.

If the keepers not claimed it verbally 'Keepers' he should still instruct the defender what to do with it 'First time' or 'Time'. Basics in the Sunday league.

I have criticised Jussi this seasons but I think his form has improved lately and he had another decent performace yesterday, lets give the lad who crossed the ball a bit of credit it was a fabulous cross and the 6 yard box was like piccadilly circus not sure Jussi could have got through the ruck of players.

Sadly, our decline has followed the deterioration in the form of Jussi and Davies. How many points must those two been responsible for winning us during their time at the club? They are damn big boots to fill when they were in their pomp.

In the interests of balance having hammered robinson on a previous thread and seen MOTD he was badly at fault for the goal

 

You mean at fault by needlessly giving away the free kick that led to the free kick he needlessly gave away, from which Fletcher, who Ricketts was supposdly marking, scored ?

 

Dont talk nonsense, it was clearly Jussi's fault

Wasn't Zat Knight supposed to be marking fletcher???

No

Jussi is a great shot stopper - his weakness has always been commanding his area / coming for crosses. Bit like Shay Given.

 

If he was as good with crosses as shots someone would have bought him off us years ago.

You mean at fault by needlessly giving away the free kick that led to the free kick he needlessly gave away, from which Fletcher, who Ricketts was supposdly marking, scored ?

 

Dont talk nonsense, it was clearly Jussi's fault

 

A point that appears to be missed was that the free kick, 99 times out of 100, wouldn't be given. It was clearly shoulder to shoulder and, if anything, the person whose direction shifted towards the other player was the wolves player. That he ran into a bigger player and then dropped like he'd been twatted with a baseball bat won him the free kick.

There were number of occaisions yesterday when we were passing it around , keeping a modicum of possession when we had to go back to the keeper. Every single time he just hoofed it long and we lost that possession we had. He is still living in the Big Sam long ball era. He cannot do anything else but put it long. He doesn't think to try an build again.

 

Please tell me your taking the piss? Jesus wept...

Jussie wasn't arguing because he has passion, he was arguing because he didn't like Cahill and then Knight, pointing out that he is a useless static bastard. Great shot stopper but that is only part of what a goalie does.

 

I reckon his long ball tactics are the biggest cause of our problems. Launching it up field as though a 28 year old SKD will get on the end of it is futile and usually results in us facing up the second ball and under pressure within seconds.

 

No defence can cope with that pressure for 90 mins. That said, I suppose we can hardly name him for the tactic, it happens so much that it must be an instruction from the iron bur drinking total football guru that is OC ...

Edited January 1, 201214 yr by Globetrotter

Please tell me your taking the piss? Jesus wept...

Which part do you disagree with?

 

Jussi continually lumping it long with Klasnic, Ngog up top is a complete waste of time!

Which part do you disagree with?

 

Jussi continually lumping it long with Klasnic, Ngog up top is a complete waste of time!

 

I'm only guessing here but I'd say if we didn't continually look for Jussi as the out ball; ie, if the forward line had a bit more movement about them; maybe Jussi wouldn't be kicking it long quite so often.

 

Besides that, if he'd played it short and then our defenders lost the ball before they even got it out of our half, half the fuckwits on here would be blaming the keeper for not punting it up the pitch.

It's hardly Jussi's fault that his only option is to knock it long - even when he plays it short it only ends up being played long by Robinson or whoever is right back for the day anyway.

 

 

It's not his only option though is it? Plenty of times that the full backs are available and our ball playing England centre half. He has the option but does not use it. I assume though that is the instruction from OC to play it long otherwise he would have been dropped.

 

I have nothing against the long ball tactic if you have a monster up front and plenty of bodies in midfield to contest the second ball. But, Coyle does not set the team up that way so like all if us I am confused about what the long ball is meant go achieve.