Out for 9 months

 

 

if you think PG is going anywhere (or if its even being considered), im afraid youre in cloud cuckoo land imo.

 

Obviously you are itk.

 

 

If i was sat reviewing my business and thought i Invested ?120 million, my assets do not cover my debts, there is a potential decrease in revenue next year, fair enough potential reduction in costs next year, the market valuation of my company decreasing year on year, performance has steadily declined over the last 5 years, during that time we had employed 3 new managers, was asked to put 3 million up in January for a player who obviously wasn't needed and i cant remember when the company last made an annual profit and then all of a sudden the wife shouted from the library "when are we likely to get that ?120 million back because I want a new kitchen?"

 

 

I would consider all possibilities including the future of the guy who has overseen my investment. But it's not all green grass and blue sky in cuckoo land

 

do you really believe you need to be itk for this?

 

football clubs are business with their own rules.

 

 

i bet you ?120 (not milliions) that pg will be next years chaiman.

 

?120 to the wways fund.

 

yes?

You missed the word consider homo, not like you that.

 

Oh and I've stopped gambling......

girl

 

I would imagine Mrs Davies is currently telling Eddie that after bob monking ?120 million of the family silver that PG's first job this summer should be dusting off his cv.

 

Probably.

But it won't happen.

Better than ream IMO

 

Although I think that down to height rather than ability.

 

Ream marking crouch is unthinkable

 

Dave's reet.

^{I have said it before but we must consider 3-5-2 if fit I would look at the following line up, in that line up we must have 2 holding in midfield}

^{to accomodate the wingers, its bold and we might get stuffed but Wigan have used that formation and been very very succesful with players no better than ours.}

 

 

Bogdan

 

Ricketts Steinson Ream

 

Petrov Coker Davies Pratley or Vela Eagles or Chung Yong

 

Ngog Davies

3 at the back with wingers and not wingbacks would be certain disaster.

Two full backs and our smallest centre back?

 

Have you been drinking since the Cup Final?

 

And Steinsson? Really?

As terrible as Knight is he WILL be the one to play unfortunately and the team WILL be:

 

Bogdan

 

Boyata Knight Ream Ricketts

 

Eagles NRC Mavies Petrov

 

SKD N'Gog

 

How do I know that is the team? Coz Coyle is predictable.

 

I would go:

 

Bogdan

 

Riley Steinsson (can't be worse than Knight) Ream Ricketts

 

NRC

 

CYL Vela Mavies Petrov

 

SKD

Edited May 8, 201214 yr by Walkden26

why should CYL be anywhere near that starting lineup?

 

he needs to be eased in slowly.

 

and in pre-season

why should CYL be anywhere near that starting lineup?

 

he needs to be eased in slowly.

 

and in pre-season

 

Against some lowly opposition?

why should CYL be anywhere near that starting lineup?

 

he needs to be eased in slowly.

 

and in pre-season

 

Because we need to win and Chris Eagles is the most dog shit player I have seen in years. I understand CYL needs to be eased back in but we need to win and with Eagles shooting irrationally everytime he gets the ball we won't do that.

Chris Eagles is the most dog shit player I have seen in years.

 

Really?

Really?

 

Yes. He is dog shit.

Yes. He is dog shit.

 

 

 

He is the most dog shit player you've seen in years.

 

Fucking hell fire.

He is the most dog shit player you've seen in years.

 

Fucking hell fire.

 

He is the worst winger I have seen at Bolton who plays consistently since Nicky Summerbee.

chris eagles is a soft target

 

he's very soft

 

girlie soft

 

but to overlook his recent contribution is dogshit

 

utter dogshit

 

if the midfield was half as effective as our two wingers have been in the last few games, we'd have the deckchairs out

chris eagles is a soft target

 

he's very soft

 

girlie soft

 

but to overlook his recent contribution is dogshit

 

utter dogshit

 

if the midfield was half as effective as our two wingers have been in the last few games, we'd have the deckchairs out

 

No, you're wrong he's the most dog shit player Wogden's have seen in years.

 

I know forum's are all about opinions, but today, that's got to win the prize for the most bollocks one!

chris eagles is a soft target

 

he's very soft

 

girlie soft

 

but to overlook his recent contribution is dogshit

 

utter dogshit

 

if the midfield was half as effective as our two wingers have been in the last few games, we'd have the deckchairs out

 

hammer to nail: critical headshot: BOOM!

Because we need to win and Chris Eagles is the most dog shit player I have seen in years. I understand CYL needs to be eased back in but we need to win and with Eagles shooting irrationally everytime he gets the ball we won't do that.

Eagles is frustrating and goes missing for long periods, but over recent weeks has stepped upto the plate, creating alot of the points we have won, and scoring important goals to boot. he is one of only a few match winners that we have at the moment, without his contribution we 'd have been stuffed weeks ago.

i dont think eagles does go missing.

 

i think thats one of his key attributes.

 

i actually like the lads application and confidence.

 

i just think he basically not good enough.

the only thing wrong with eagles is he shows he can do it then instantly fucks up. its like a peep show. looks good but you get nothing!

 

mavies is over rated with a ratio to end product!

i dont think eagles does go missing.

 

i think thats one of his key attributes.

 

i actually like the lads application and confidence.

 

i just think he basically not good enough.

 

See, I think if he had any sort of self belief he'd be a much better player than he actually is.

 

When he puts a ball in the box, particularly a dead ball, he doesn't think for a minute that anything will come from it.

 

Same when he shoots.