Last I heard, it was court tomorrow

 

ST and Lies reported 3, including Heathcotes mob

 

KA said that was old news, leaving 2

 

 

Now, I can see HMRC is definitely a club issue,but the other is Sport Shield

 

If we assume KA can deal with HMRC debt - I'd have been happier if he had sorted that one already, tbf- that 'just' leaves SS and blumarble

 

If the court agrees to wind up SS, do we know what that means and also the impact on BWFC

Edited May 21, 20179 yr by Casino

He has no official link to the trust

 

But he is a cnut

It's a piss poor tweet that's for sure.

He has no official link to the trust

 

But he is a cnut

Well in with the trust though....

Tbf, as much as he is a nob, along with Suffolk white, I've no evidence to link him to them

 

Other than being extremely supportive of them and knocking Ken and Lee Anderson from day one

Tbf, as much as he is a nob, along with Suffolk white, I've no evidence to link him to them

 

Other than being extremely supportive of them and knocking Ken and Lee Anderson from day one

 

One of the live twitter feeds done at the time we were in court at the end of Davies reign, which was supposedly being done by 'Smurf' was actually done by one of the ST board - George Bower (twitter name Continuum).

 

Not that it means anything and we were all happy to hear news from whoever could supply it but I felt a bit uneasy at the time due to the lack of transparency both by a key ST representative and the LoV site on behalf of who pretend that it was 'Smurf' who was tweeting, when they knew he wasn't.

 

Why the need for the pretence particularly after the ST had put themselves forward at the time as a rival bidder to Holdsworth (and consequently Anderson) becoming the clubs new owner and had promised to be open, honest and transparent themselves!

 

It all seemed a bit unnecessary, disreputable and underhanded to me and that's how things have seemingly continued in my opinion and which is something I find quite ironic considering that the ST, LoV, Smurf et al seem to be basing their continuing objection to Anderson being at the club on the very same reasons.

Bower is another cock:)

 

He's another who may/may not be on the board

 

It's amazing how difficult it is to get to the truth with the mistrust

Mounts can you not just get them to say who is on the board now you are fwends with the trust 

Mounts can you not just get them to say who is on the board now you are fwends with the trust

Maggie Tetlow, Mike Smith, Daniel Izza, Ian Bridge, George Bower, Terence Rigby, are the board members, obviously Bridge has resigned, Mike Egan is treasurer and SJM is ambassador.

Edited May 25, 20179 yr by Mounts Kipper

LOV, cunts like Firth, all enemies of Bolton Wanderers. In it for self-promotion and fuck all else. Ignore them, starve them of the oxygen of publicity that they crave.

LOV, cunts like Firth, all enemies of Bolton Wanderers. In it for self-promotion and fuck all else. Ignore them, starve them of the oxygen of publicity that they crave.

 

 

Get off the fence FFS

I know, I know. My only real gripe is them sullying the good name of the actual Lion of Vienna.

LOV, cunts like Firth, all enemies of Bolton Wanderers. In it for self-promotion and fuck all else. Ignore them, starve them of the oxygen of publicity that they crave.

Put your curly haired laden ball sack in my mouth Carlos.

adjourned another 4 weeks at the request of BM

adjourned another 4 weeks at the request of BM

 

Why are they requesting this?

maybe they don't have a case

Why are they requesting this?

because I think it's getting paid

I don't believe anything until the Supporters' Trust have tweeted it, hiding behind someone else's account.

For what it is worth I think the ST has been potted for now.

 

Bridge their Chairman has reportedly gone - although neither Iles or his friends on the LoV have made any comments what so ever on the matter - nor indeed the ST themselves publically on their website or twitter.  Also the BWSA seems to have suddenly become more 'in the know' than the ST ever was, by tweeting last week about forthcoming signings - which occurred the very next days.

 

The only 'anti-Anderson' left standing seems to be Firth (the Smurf) who posted an article on the LoV demanding that Ken sort out the BluMarble loan, bring income into the club, publish the accounts, get us out of the transfer embargo and buy players to strengthen the squad - right this minute, so to speak.

 

I won't link to the article as it is honestly not worth reading in my opinion.

They are still tweeting! Happy birthday to Bruno N'Gotty btw! Is it a bot or a real person behind that?

 

Either way, the AGM is coming up, surely.

Inner Circle Investments (i.e. KA) has offered to pay the BluMarble loan in full. I assume that we can take this statement at face value and BWFC assets will not be sold off to meet part or all of the loan (bear in mind there is a legal charge against BWFC assets if the loan is not paid, approved by the Directors last year).

Whatever the views of LoV it makes some valid points. The Club is in limbo until this loan is paid off, the 2015/16 accounts are produced (2 months overdue) and the auditors are able to express satisfaction that the Club is a viable going concern (remember that Deloittes were forced to resign because they were unable to obtain sufficient information from the Directors to satisfy themselves that the Club was viable on a going concern basis).

Inner Circle Investments (i.e. KA) has offered to pay the BluMarble loan in full. I assume that we can take this statement at face value and BWFC assets will not be sold off to meet part or all of the loan (bear in mind there is a legal charge against BWFC assets if the loan is not paid, approved by the Directors last year).

Whatever the views of LoV it makes some valid points. The Club is in limbo until this loan is paid off, the 2015/16 accounts are produced (2 months overdue) and the auditors are able to express satisfaction that the Club is a viable going concern (remember that Deloittes were forced to resign because they were unable to obtain sufficient information from the Directors to satisfy themselves that the Club was viable on a going concern basis).

 

With respect there is nothing in your post that we were not aware of following from last months adjournment.

The same applies fully to the LoV article also.

The only issue that I do take you up on is whether or not Deloittes were as you state "FORCED to resign".

Anderson stated that it was his intention to change auditors because of Deloittes costs compared to other companies some months before they resigned from doing the clubs audit.

The change of audit companies had previously been made public before the event happened.

Maybe the Deloitte contract was terminated earlier than initially agreed I don't know, but as for being 'forced' to leave, is that your knowledge of the matter or merely an assumption you are making?

Remember any audit company will be required to apply the same auditing principles to the accounts and as such the new audit company will still need to satisfy themselves fully about ownership issues and the club being a going concern.  These matters can't simply be 'hidden away' by simply changing auditors.

 

As I'm sure you probably know all that in the first place it makes me curious of why you posted what you have done above?

The legal resignation notice is recorded by Companies House on 21/4/2017. I am surprised you have not read it. The auditors set out the reasons for their resignation.

The Club is, of course, legally obliged to bring it to the notice of all creditors and shareholders. I am not sure that this has been done.

For whatever reason, you obviously feel that this is not valid information to raise.

That Kym Marsh vid though

The legal resignation notice is recorded by Companies House on 21/4/2017. I am surprised you have not read it. The auditors set out the reasons for their resignation.

The Club is, of course, legally obliged to bring it to the notice of all creditors and shareholders. I am not sure that this has been done.

For whatever reason, you obviously feel that this is not valid information to raise.

 

I read it several weeks ago and my point still stands, as I said above -

 

"...the new audit company will still need to satisfy themselves fully about ownership issues and the club being a going concern.  These matters can't simply be 'hidden away' by simply changing auditors".

 

You however have swerved my question as to why you stated they were "FORCED to resign" .

 

The club announced the change of auditors on the 29th March - see link below -

 

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/15189671.Wanderers_appoint_new_financial_director_and_auditors/

 

I'm sure you were aware of this so again in makes me even more curious as to what your game is?

I know what his game is - shit stirring. Fuck all else.

They were 'forced to resign' because they were unable to fulfil their professional duties. Standard practice. I posted the information simply to correct the KA version that the move was purely for commercial (i.e cost) reasons. I apologise for doing so.