is that it now game over no chance of POTUS

 

Rayguns out

1 hour ago, Dimron said:

Trump has now ditched the Endangerment Finding put in place by Obama... now set to overtake China as the world's biggest polluter

“We’re the best polluters. Bestest in the world. Everybody is saying this. We’ll do pollution on a scale no one has seen before. Drill baby drill. Coal baby coal. Lots of beautiful smoke. The best in producing CO2.  Then we’ll have the biggest storms, the most rain, the hottest temperatures, the most asthma. They don’t call me Dementia Don for nothing…..ramble ramble….” 

1 hour ago, Dimron said:

Trump has now ditched the Endangerment Finding put in place by Obama... now set to overtake China as the world's biggest polluter

So long as that pollution finds its way to Mar-a-Lago, and its golf course...

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

You think once these ongoing cases are settled we will see the full files with no redactions? 

No because many of the victims have said they don’t want to be named 

10 minutes ago, royal white said:

No because many of the victims have said they don’t want to be named 

Therein is the main issue.

Whichever way it's looked at, someone won't be happy. 

Conspiracy theories will abound, or even lawsuits for identities wrongly released.

 

Boring boring Epstein

boring boring epstein

 

36 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Therein is the main issue.

Whichever way it's looked at, someone won't be happy. 

Conspiracy theories will abound, or even lawsuits for identities wrongly released.

 

Some got named by accident apparently with the redacting pen not doing it's job quite as well for victims for some weird reason.

But what about those people who have given up their anonymity? Are there any ongoing investigations for them?

1 hour ago, Sweep said:

He's a great disruptor, don't judge him on what he does today, judge him at the end of his term. 

He's a discombobulator

7 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Not a good look all this sex abuse stuff over there. 

Then again, it's arguably much worse over here. Nothing gets done, and our leader also looks lost in it all.

There's more activity over Epstein in the UK than there ever was over the far worse abuse of all around the country by Pakistani grooming gangs. Khans London is still trying to cover it up.

A measure of where left leaning media has taken us.

1 hour ago, Sweep said:

He's a great disruptor, don't judge him on what he does today, judge him at the end of his term. 

Well said sir. You are really coming along.

1 hour ago, Bertie said:

“We’re the best polluters. Bestest in the world. Everybody is saying this. We’ll do pollution on a scale no one has seen before. Drill baby drill. Coal baby coal. Lots of beautiful smoke. The best in producing CO2.  Then we’ll have the biggest storms, the most rain, the hottest temperatures, the most asthma. They don’t call me Dementia Don for nothing…..ramble ramble….” 

Buster Bloodvessel Bertie 

1 hour ago, Spider said:

Boring boring Epstein

boring boring epstein

 

"He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of...... life"

The words of a genius gentlemen. The words of a god fearing, deal making, stable genius!

On 07/02/2026 at 22:29, wanderer1984 said:

Weird that some folk on here associate black people as apes/monkeys. 

A bit of light hearted humour for the weekend. 
 

 

9 hours ago, Winchester White said:

Some got named by accident apparently with the redacting pen not doing it's job quite as well for victims for some weird reason.

But what about those people who have given up their anonymity? Are there any ongoing investigations for them?

Not sure what you're saying there.

Victims or culprits?

17 hours ago, Sweep said:

Shadowy illuminati types....

Fuck knows to be honest, but there must be some reason there are so many redactions 

Bondi has warned that people should not want prosecutions as that could lead to a “complete collapse of the system”

So presumably that’s finance, tech, military, governments..

Many names already fit those so to say they’re being protected isn’t exactly controversial. She’s pretty much said it herself. 
 

10 hours ago, royal white said:

No because many of the victims have said they don’t want to be named 

Have they?

Most of the redactions are fo perpetrators as opposed to victims. Many of the victims are referred to as “pizza’s”, etc. 

 

If there were so many high ranking individuals that has visited Epstein Island, surely something would have come out earlier?

Clearly some high profile people have been there, but just how many could have avoided scrutiny?

It’s no longer a left v right issue, or Trump v Clinton issue or whatever this. It’s just a lack of decency and morals all round. The protection of people over the welfare and justice for the victims has made me feel a bit depressed 

There are families who have been broken by these monsters and it seems like they’ll never ever get justice because so many people want the truth surpressed

Just now, boltonboris said:

Have they?

Most of the redactions are fo perpetrators as opposed to victims. Many of the victims are referred to as “pizza’s”, etc. 

 

You don't know that, by definition of a redaction!

We can all surmise and may well be correct, but it is also perfectly possible that some victims didn't want to be named.

It is important to remember that these files aren't a collection of papers from Epstein himself, but a much wider range of reports and accusations. Many from some who claim to be victims. These people could be very scared of having their identities revealed- for obvious reasons.

Under those circumstances, it is perfectly possible that names of victims are hidden. 

4 minutes ago, boltonboris said:

Have they?

Most of the redactions are fo perpetrators as opposed to victims. Many of the victims are referred to as “pizza’s”, etc. 

 

Yes 

 

Pizzas? Really? 
 

 

18 minutes ago, royal white said:

Yes 

 

Pizzas? Really? 
 

 

Yes. Really. 

18 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

You don't know that, by definition of a redaction!

We can all surmise and may well be correct, but it is also perfectly possible that some victims didn't want to be named.

It is important to remember that these files aren't a collection of papers from Epstein himself, but a much wider range of reports and accusations. Many from some who claim to be victims. These people could be very scared of having their identities revealed- for obvious reasons.

Under those circumstances, it is perfectly possible that names of victims are hidden. 

Yeah I get that. But there are victims who don’t want their identities revealed who have the names of their attackers redacted

45 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Not sure what you're saying there.

Victims or culprits?

Some of the victims, I couldn't care less about the culprits.

Just now, boltonboris said:

Yeah I get that. But there are victims who don’t want their identities revealed who have the names of their attackers redacted

Rightly so.

They're only alleged at this point.

Just imagine the trouble that would cause, with legal actions galore.

All this is potential evidence in a series of investigations. 

Cocking that up from the outset, would almost certainly mean those purpotrators get away with it, and victims don't see justice.

You either want proper, legal process to take place, or nothing more than accusations and tittle tattle that goes nowhere, apart from litigation and accusers potentially making money.

Whether the full legal process will ever happen in some cases is a different matter, but the information has to be gone through, and cases built. 

There’s absolutely no evidence that the DOJ have spoken to any of the victims. 

Just now, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Rightly so.

They're only alleged at this point.

Just imagine the trouble that would cause, with legal actions galore.

All this is potential evidence in a series of investigations. 

Cocking that up from the outset, would almost certainly mean those purpotrators get away with it, and victims don't see justice.

You either want proper, legal process to take place, or nothing more than accusations and tittle tattle that goes nowhere, apart from litigation and accusers potentially making money.

Whether the full legal process will ever happen in some cases is a different matter, but the information has to be gone through, and cases built. 

I doubt that there will never be any justice to be honest and I doubt any names are being withheld pending investigation. I think they’re redacted to protect them, not protect the legal system.