Sweep Posted February 12 Posted February 12 38 minutes ago, Spider said: What a fucking cunt he truly is He's a great disruptor, don't judge him on what he does today, judge him at the end of his term. Quote
Bertie Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Dimron said: Trump has now ditched the Endangerment Finding put in place by Obama... now set to overtake China as the world's biggest polluter “We’re the best polluters. Bestest in the world. Everybody is saying this. We’ll do pollution on a scale no one has seen before. Drill baby drill. Coal baby coal. Lots of beautiful smoke. The best in producing CO2. Then we’ll have the biggest storms, the most rain, the hottest temperatures, the most asthma. They don’t call me Dementia Don for nothing…..ramble ramble….” Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Dimron said: Trump has now ditched the Endangerment Finding put in place by Obama... now set to overtake China as the world's biggest polluter So long as that pollution finds its way to Mar-a-Lago, and its golf course... Quote
royal white Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, gonzo said: You think once these ongoing cases are settled we will see the full files with no redactions? No because many of the victims have said they don’t want to be named Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted February 12 Posted February 12 10 minutes ago, royal white said: No because many of the victims have said they don’t want to be named Therein is the main issue. Whichever way it's looked at, someone won't be happy. Conspiracy theories will abound, or even lawsuits for identities wrongly released. Quote
Winchester White Posted February 12 Posted February 12 36 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Therein is the main issue. Whichever way it's looked at, someone won't be happy. Conspiracy theories will abound, or even lawsuits for identities wrongly released. Some got named by accident apparently with the redacting pen not doing it's job quite as well for victims for some weird reason. But what about those people who have given up their anonymity? Are there any ongoing investigations for them? Quote
Traf Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Sweep said: He's a great disruptor, don't judge him on what he does today, judge him at the end of his term. He's a discombobulator Quote
bolty58 Posted February 12 Posted February 12 7 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Not a good look all this sex abuse stuff over there. Then again, it's arguably much worse over here. Nothing gets done, and our leader also looks lost in it all. There's more activity over Epstein in the UK than there ever was over the far worse abuse of all around the country by Pakistani grooming gangs. Khans London is still trying to cover it up. A measure of where left leaning media has taken us. Quote
bolty58 Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Sweep said: He's a great disruptor, don't judge him on what he does today, judge him at the end of his term. Well said sir. You are really coming along. Quote
bolty58 Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Bertie said: “We’re the best polluters. Bestest in the world. Everybody is saying this. We’ll do pollution on a scale no one has seen before. Drill baby drill. Coal baby coal. Lots of beautiful smoke. The best in producing CO2. Then we’ll have the biggest storms, the most rain, the hottest temperatures, the most asthma. They don’t call me Dementia Don for nothing…..ramble ramble….” Buster Bloodvessel Bertie Quote
kent_white Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Spider said: Boring boring Epstein boring boring epstein "He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of...... life" The words of a genius gentlemen. The words of a god fearing, deal making, stable genius! Quote
royal white Posted February 13 Posted February 13 On 07/02/2026 at 22:29, wanderer1984 said: Weird that some folk on here associate black people as apes/monkeys. A bit of light hearted humour for the weekend. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted February 13 Posted February 13 9 hours ago, Winchester White said: Some got named by accident apparently with the redacting pen not doing it's job quite as well for victims for some weird reason. But what about those people who have given up their anonymity? Are there any ongoing investigations for them? Not sure what you're saying there. Victims or culprits? Quote
boltonboris Posted February 13 Posted February 13 17 hours ago, Sweep said: Shadowy illuminati types.... Fuck knows to be honest, but there must be some reason there are so many redactions Bondi has warned that people should not want prosecutions as that could lead to a “complete collapse of the system” So presumably that’s finance, tech, military, governments.. Many names already fit those so to say they’re being protected isn’t exactly controversial. She’s pretty much said it herself. Quote
boltonboris Posted February 13 Posted February 13 10 hours ago, royal white said: No because many of the victims have said they don’t want to be named Have they? Most of the redactions are fo perpetrators as opposed to victims. Many of the victims are referred to as “pizza’s”, etc. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted February 13 Posted February 13 If there were so many high ranking individuals that has visited Epstein Island, surely something would have come out earlier? Clearly some high profile people have been there, but just how many could have avoided scrutiny? Quote
boltonboris Posted February 13 Posted February 13 It’s no longer a left v right issue, or Trump v Clinton issue or whatever this. It’s just a lack of decency and morals all round. The protection of people over the welfare and justice for the victims has made me feel a bit depressed There are families who have been broken by these monsters and it seems like they’ll never ever get justice because so many people want the truth surpressed Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted February 13 Posted February 13 Just now, boltonboris said: Have they? Most of the redactions are fo perpetrators as opposed to victims. Many of the victims are referred to as “pizza’s”, etc. You don't know that, by definition of a redaction! We can all surmise and may well be correct, but it is also perfectly possible that some victims didn't want to be named. It is important to remember that these files aren't a collection of papers from Epstein himself, but a much wider range of reports and accusations. Many from some who claim to be victims. These people could be very scared of having their identities revealed- for obvious reasons. Under those circumstances, it is perfectly possible that names of victims are hidden. Quote
royal white Posted February 13 Posted February 13 4 minutes ago, boltonboris said: Have they? Most of the redactions are fo perpetrators as opposed to victims. Many of the victims are referred to as “pizza’s”, etc. Yes Pizzas? Really? Quote
boltonboris Posted February 13 Posted February 13 18 minutes ago, royal white said: Yes Pizzas? Really? Yes. Really. Quote
boltonboris Posted February 13 Posted February 13 18 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: You don't know that, by definition of a redaction! We can all surmise and may well be correct, but it is also perfectly possible that some victims didn't want to be named. It is important to remember that these files aren't a collection of papers from Epstein himself, but a much wider range of reports and accusations. Many from some who claim to be victims. These people could be very scared of having their identities revealed- for obvious reasons. Under those circumstances, it is perfectly possible that names of victims are hidden. Yeah I get that. But there are victims who don’t want their identities revealed who have the names of their attackers redacted Quote
Winchester White Posted February 13 Posted February 13 45 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Not sure what you're saying there. Victims or culprits? Some of the victims, I couldn't care less about the culprits. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted February 13 Posted February 13 Just now, boltonboris said: Yeah I get that. But there are victims who don’t want their identities revealed who have the names of their attackers redacted Rightly so. They're only alleged at this point. Just imagine the trouble that would cause, with legal actions galore. All this is potential evidence in a series of investigations. Cocking that up from the outset, would almost certainly mean those purpotrators get away with it, and victims don't see justice. You either want proper, legal process to take place, or nothing more than accusations and tittle tattle that goes nowhere, apart from litigation and accusers potentially making money. Whether the full legal process will ever happen in some cases is a different matter, but the information has to be gone through, and cases built. Quote
boltonboris Posted February 13 Posted February 13 There’s absolutely no evidence that the DOJ have spoken to any of the victims. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.