is that it now game over no chance of POTUS

 

Rayguns out

On 05/02/2026 at 00:15, bolty58 said:

 Tied myself in knots eh? The Don is in no 'firing line' as far as the Epstein files from what I can see.

You clearly know more or are being swept along with the tidal wave of hate on here.

I don't know how many times you need to hear it FFS but, if anything is ever proven about Trump being a filthy paedo, I will escort him to the gallows with you.

 

9 hours ago, bolty58 said:

'Denied' 

Of course I have first hand knowledge  

Not sure why the ginger pie eater likes to throw out the childish insults. More than likely because I have him on ignore. You can see why.

What fucking nonsense but then again, you are only living up to your WWays moniker.

Paid brasses being labelled 'survivors' and 'victims' is a joke. The legally under age ones involved are the true victims and survivors who deserve justice (and compensation if that's where it goes).

Seems that you, Anus and the ginger numbskull have trouble accepting this.

Yes you have denied it ! 
 

Replying twice, contradicting yourself.

Must be too much sun ! 
 

 

6 hours ago, Bertie said:

Hmm. Not sure why you keep going down this dead end.

I don’t think you mean this, but it comes across as though you’re saying any woman in the files over 18 who received any money for sex can’t complain if they had any sort of abuse inflicted on them, that they can’t seek any justice if crimes were committed against them? In effect you’re saying it’s their own fault?

Feel free to tell me I’ve got the wrong end of the stick.

If I haven’t then you’re saying any adult prostitute/escort can never be physically or emotionally harmed, raped or even murdered? You’re saying because they’re getting paid any crime would be ok, because they can never be a victim? Which quite frankly would make you look a bit daft.

He'll try and think about it 

Decide you're wrong based on nothing 

Then just reply with what he thinks is an amusing version of your username 

Standard Botty 

 

 

 

Fucking hell!

 

If it is true (which I doubt) if they were over 18 and getting paid for being there, then it's their own fault if they've been dissolved in acid. Or something like that.

I suppose with Epstein being a multi millionaire, it wouldn't be surprising to see him create a "slush" fund.

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

 

 

 

Getting to “kids being trafficked in wayfair furniture” Level of conspiracies now 😆 remember that one 

2 hours ago, royal white said:

Getting to “kids being trafficked in wayfair furniture” Level of conspiracies now 😆 remember that one 

Tbf it's actually in the files. He had it delivered. It's there in black and white.

 

 

Yeah it's just thr victims blacked out

16 hours ago, Bertie said:

Hmm. Not sure why you keep going down this dead end.

I don’t think you mean this, but it comes across as though you’re saying any woman in the files over 18 who received any money for sex can’t complain if they had any sort of abuse inflicted on them, that they can’t seek any justice if crimes were committed against them? In effect you’re saying it’s their own fault?

Feel free to tell me I’ve got the wrong end of the stick.

If I haven’t then you’re saying any adult prostitute/escort can never be physically or emotionally harmed, raped or even murdered? You’re saying because they’re getting paid any crime would be ok, because they can never be a victim? Which quite frankly would make you look a bit daft.

You've got the wrong end of the stick.

Par for the course.

10 hours ago, Ani said:

 

Yes you have denied it ! 
 

Replying twice, contradicting yourself.

Must be too much sun ! 
 

 

You are becoming tiresome.

Must be too much cold.

10 hours ago, DirtySanchez said:

He'll try and think about it 

Decide you're wrong based on nothing 

Then just reply with what he thinks is an amusing version of your username 

Standard Botty 

 

No doubt the last two words are your thing.

3 hours ago, gonzo said:

 

 

Yeah it's just thr victims blacked out

Was reading the other day Maxwell is trying to make a deal in return for giving us the truth about who did what

Says she'll prove the likes of trump and Clinton (and presumably whoever else you want) are innocent in return for clemency

Think it's trump who is the one to give it the go ahead 

Fuck her and let her rot 

9 hours ago, gonzo said:

Tbf it's actually in the files. He had it delivered. It's there in black and white.

Well that confirms it then 😄

6 hours ago, bolty58 said:

 

No doubt the last two words are your thing.

Nah

 

I'll leave that to the bloke posing naked on a hairdryer for an avater who meets up with like-minded men

The heat will get turned up another notch when the Clinton’s testify before Congress next week. They wanted to do so in public but Desperate Donny has insisted it’s happens in private. Wonder why 🤔.

Interesting DoJ quote in the BBC article….

In relation to the allegations against Trump, the DoJ has previously said: "Some docs contain untrue and sensationalist claims against Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear the claims are unfounded and false and if they have any shred of credibility they certainly would have been weaponised against Trump already."

Yeah right. Tick Tock Trump.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czx47k34yqxo

Edited February 17Feb 17 by Bertie

13 minutes ago, Bertie said:

The heat will get turned up another notch when the Clinton’s testify before Congress next week. They wanted to do so in public but Desperate Donny has insisted it’s happens in private. Wonder why 🤔.

Interesting DoJ quote in the BBC article….

In relation to the allegations against Trump, the DoJ has previously said: "Some docs contain untrue and sensationalist claims against Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear the claims are unfounded and false and if they have any shred of credibility they certainly would have been weaponised against Trump already."

Yeah right. Tick Tock Trump.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czx47k34yqxo

I can’t find anything anywhere showing “desperate Donny insisting on it being in private” is this some more info that only certain WW posters are privvy to? 

Edited February 17Feb 17 by royal white

14 minutes ago, royal white said:

I can’t find anything anywhere showing “desperate Donny insisting on it being in private” is this some more info that only certain WW posters are privvy to? 

The house oversight committee has scheduled a behind closed doors deposition

Kentucky Republican and maga-ist James Comer is chair of the committee 

14 minutes ago, royal white said:

I can’t find anything anywhere showing “desperate Donny insisting on it being in private” is this some more info that only certain WW posters are privvy to? 

It’s at the insistence of (Republican) House Oversight Chair James Comer. We all know where he’ll be getting his instructions from.

Do you think the Clinton’s testimonies should be in public or private?

4 minutes ago, Bertie said:

It’s at the insistence of (Republican) House Oversight Chair James Comer. We all know where he’ll be getting his instructions from.

Do you think the Clinton’s testimonies should be in public or private?

So no then. AI can be handy for quotes like yours. 
 

Heres the reply. 
 

Clinton-related information is private mainly due to:

 

⚖️ Court protections

⚖️ Legal confidentiality

⚖️ Lack of charges or trial

 

—not because of a decision by James Comer.

 

 

15 minutes ago, royal white said:

So no then. AI can be handy for quotes like yours. 
 

Heres the reply. 
 

Clinton-related information is private mainly due to:

 

⚖️ Court protections

⚖️ Legal confidentiality

⚖️ Lack of charges or trial

 

—not because of a decision by James Comer.

 

 

Waffle and piffle.

I asked Google AI the same and got more waffle and piffle below. Seems clear though the Republicans pushed for private. All this just needs to be public so the world can know the truth. Simple.

In February 2026, Bill and Hillary Clinton agreed to provide closed-door depositions to the House Oversight Committee following a months-long standoff. While the Clintons have recently requested that these hearings be held in public to ensure "fairness" and "transparency," the Republican-led committee has maintained that they be conducted privately. 

The reasons for the private format include:

Standard Investigative Procedure: House Oversight Chairman James Comer has insisted on closed-door, filmed, and transcribed depositions as a consistent requirement for the investigation.

Rejection of "Special Treatment": Republicans argued that the Clintons' initial requests for written statements or private interviews without transcripts were attempts to gain "special treatment" not afforded to other witnesses.

Control of Information: By holding depositions in private first, the committee can control the release of sensitive information and ensure that any potential future public hearings are based on established testimony.

Legal Leverage: The private format was the final "eleventh-hour" agreement reached to stave off a bipartisan contempt of Congressvote after the Clintons previously failed to appear for multiple scheduled dates. 

11 minutes ago, Bertie said:

Waffle and piffle.

I asked Google AI the same and got more waffle and piffle below. Seems clear though the Republicans pushed for private. All this just needs to be public so the world can know the truth. Simple.

In February 2026, Bill and Hillary Clinton agreed to provide closed-door depositions to the House Oversight Committee following a months-long standoff. While the Clintons have recently requested that these hearings be held in public to ensure "fairness" and "transparency," the Republican-led committee has maintained that they be conducted privately. 

The reasons for the private format include:

Standard Investigative Procedure: House Oversight Chairman James Comer has insisted on closed-door, filmed, and transcribed depositions as a consistent requirement for the investigation.

Rejection of "Special Treatment": Republicans argued that the Clintons' initial requests for written statements or private interviews without transcripts were attempts to gain "special treatment" not afforded to other witnesses.

Control of Information: By holding depositions in private first, the committee can control the release of sensitive information and ensure that any potential future public hearings are based on established testimony.

Legal Leverage: The private format was the final "eleventh-hour" agreement reached to stave off a bipartisan contempt of Congressvote after the Clintons previously failed to appear for multiple scheduled dates. 

So no special treatment then, sticking to the rules so it seem? 
 

I wonder why the Clintons initially asked for them to be in private? Maybe now they’re asking for them in public knowing that they can’t be in public. 

I can see why folk would want alleged perpetrators to be named.

Nevertheless, until any claims are investigated and charges made, then anonymity is fair.

Similar here.

It may seem unfair, but the greater unfairness would be an action prevented on technicalities. 

Biggest crime is failure to properly investigate at all.

7 hours ago, Zico said:

Was reading the other day Maxwell is trying to make a deal in return for giving us the truth about who did what

Says she'll prove the likes of trump and Clinton (and presumably whoever else you want) are innocent in return for clemency

Think it's trump who is the one to give it the go ahead 

Fuck her and let her rot 

She has requested a pardon to protect her from further liability under the fifth amendment, as things stand she cannot be forced to testify but could be in contempt of court... or something like that

16 minutes ago, Dimron said:

She has requested a pardon to protect her from further liability under the fifth amendment, as things stand she cannot be forced to testify but could be in contempt of court... or something like that

Can't see how it will work 

Trump has made it clear he's not done anything wrong 

So having Maxwell come out and say Trump is innocent makes no difference, but she wants clemency in return 

It's really not in his interests to help her 

She should be offering up the guilty ones for what that's worth