I noticed the Justice Secretary was tweeting about the case as it was happening yesterday, which I find astonishing.

6 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

Agree to some Extent but they’re not all As focused on her on one single purpose. 
 

Strange thing yesterday was one of the snp big wigs saying they want to put this behind us as it’s not productive in the middle of a pandemic. Shortly after they’ve recently launched Indy ref2 and invested hundreds of thousands of pounds Into it and put several people full time On it. Made me chuckle as the pandemic musnt have seemed so important that day 

I wish we could cut off their money supply

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I noticed the Justice Secretary was tweeting about the case as it was happening yesterday, which I find astonishing.

It’s very much keystone cops. 
 

the WW kangaroo court would have done a much better job. They would all be found guilty by now even those not on trial 😎

1 hour ago, Escobarp said:

It’s very much keystone cops. 
 

the WW kangaroo court would have done a much better job. They would all be found guilty by now even those not on trial 😎

No the silent majority in here support her. It is not a who shouts loudest contest, although if it was you lot would be wining obvs. 

A 10 minute read into the whole sordid affair and I'm of the opinion that the entire fucking lot should be fired immediately and have their weekly ration of Bell's removed for a few years.

As a sitting judge in the WW Kangaroo Court, I think we can comfortably assume Salmond is guilty of pressing his sausagey fingers into the moist ginger dewflaps of unsuspecting Scottish interns.

Sturgeon is, likewise, guilty as sin for a number of crimes. If Miami says she's guilty, that's good enough for me.

Send them and their circles of sycophantic clan loyalists to a small island in the outer hebrides, where they can all share a single roomed bothy and shit into empty mussel shells for a couple of years.

Edited March 4, 20215 yr by Spider

20 minutes ago, Ani said:

No the silent majority in here support her. It is not a who shouts loudest contest, although if it was you lot would be wining obvs. 

You lot?

14 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

You lot?

The Elephantine Eleven.

It's the nickname given by the leftist cable to a certain grouping on here.

34 minutes ago, Ani said:

No the silent majority in here support her. It is not a who shouts loudest contest, although if it was you lot would be wining obvs. 

Really? I doubt that but if you have any facts to prove your statement, I’ll happily accept. Just reading through this and it’s interesting how many people don’t give a fuck but then post countless times to prove they do.

Political naivety or hypocrisy?

After Boris and Rishi, she’s  probably the most influential politician in the U.K. at the moment.

 People said Farage was irrelevant then look what happened.

 

3 minutes ago, Youri McAnespie said:

The Elephantine Eleven.

It's the nickname given by the leftist cable to a certain grouping on here.

I assume you're referring to Ocean's 9 here?

Our very own cabal of reactionaries, supping ever deeper from their leather tankards full of comforting nostalgia.

11 minutes ago, Youri McAnespie said:

The Elephantine Eleven.

It's the nickname given by the leftist cable to a certain grouping on here.

Leftist cable. That’s a new one on me 😎

1 minute ago, Spider said:

I assume you're referring to Ocean's 9 here?

Our very own cabal of reactionaries, supping ever deeper from their leather tankards full of comforting nostalgia.

😎😎😎😎😁😁🎸🎸😂😂😂🥳🥳🥳🥳🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

Just now, Escobarp said:

Leftist cable. That’s a new one on me 😎

it's the stuff they hang themselves with 

"I don't like change, me. I want things back the way they were when I were a lad. Cheerful shopkeepers, foreigners where they belong and the ability to call a spade a spade"

 

5 minutes ago, Spider said:

"I don't like change, me. I want things back the way they were when we were in the EU

 

It works both ways. Being Reactionary is not necessarily left or right, politically.

Are we up to 11?

4 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I noticed the Justice Secretary was tweeting about the case as it was happening yesterday, which I find astonishing.

Why?

It's live on TV, so as long as nothing is said that could be prejudicial, and is just a discussion of events, like on here, then no wrong has been done.

It is an inquiry, not a court of law and won't be governed in the same way.

36 minutes ago, Spider said:

I assume you're referring to Ocean's 9 here?

Our very own cabal of reactionaries, supping ever deeper from their leather tankards full of comforting nostalgia.

 

19 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Are we up to 11?

You've both obviously missed Bedwetters' Bi-Monthly, you're both behind.

We're actually down one to 11 after the departure of one of the Dastardly Dozen.

30 minutes ago, Youri McAnespie said:

 

You've both obviously missed Bedwetters' Bi-Monthly, you're both behind.

We're actually down one to 11 after the departure of one of the Dastardly Dozen.

Does this month have the centre spread of a fully dressed academic discussing Rimbaud? I'll be gutted if I've missed that.

Could have put this in either this or the COVID  thread. This seemed the most appropriate.

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/covid-19-italy-and-eu-block-oxford-vaccine-shipment-to-australia-12235848
 

For 3 reasons this is important.

1. I want to see my son.

2. I want to see the Ashes.

3. Blatant protectionism by the EU that will eventually come back to haunt them. 

6 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Does this month have the centre spread of a fully dressed academic discussing Rimbaud? I'll be gutted if I've missed that.

Online edition's up:

https.//BetwettersBi-Monthly.co,uk

There's sport too via more pseudophilosophical musings courtesy of regular columnist Joseph Bar-Ton.

1 hour ago, Escobarp said:

You lot?

I put a 'you lot' comment in every few weeks just to see if you respond in the same way 😂

2 minutes ago, Ani said:

I put a 'you lot' comment in every few weeks just to see if you respond in the same way 😂

😆😆😁😎😂👏🏻👏🏻🧐😍😍🤣🇬🇧😅😘😘🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳

1 hour ago, Boby Brno said:

Really? I doubt that but if you have any facts to prove your statement, I’ll happily accept. Just reading through this and it’s interesting how many people don’t give a fuck but then post countless times to prove they do.

Political naivety or hypocrisy?

After Boris and Rishi, she’s  probably the most influential politician in the U.K. at the moment.

 People said Farage was irrelevant then look what happened.

 

Neither, I was not really being serious I was replying to a comment about WWAys kangaroo court deciding the future of the First Minister of Scotland and the verdict being 100% kick her out. I did not think Esco was seriously suggesting that was an option hence my equally glib reply. 
 

There again I may just be politically naive ?? 😁😎

4 minutes ago, Boby Brno said:

Could have put this in either this or the COVID  thread. This seemed the most appropriate.

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/covid-19-italy-and-eu-block-oxford-vaccine-shipment-to-australia-12235848
 

For 3 reasons this is important.

1. I want to see my son.

2. I want to see the Ashes.

3. Blatant protectionism by the EU that will eventually come back to haunt them. 

It's a weird one this. Suppose it goes back to when contracts were agreed and the nature of them.

If the EU has a legal basis, then maybe nowt that AZ can do.

However, on the face of it, it does seem protectionist. 

Strange too that Germany has now decided to use it on their gippers.

1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Why?

It's live on TV, so as long as nothing is said that could be prejudicial, and is just a discussion of events, like on here, then no wrong has been done.

It is an inquiry, not a court of law and won't be governed in the same way.

Because I think it's improper.