What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

2 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I said since 2016. 

 

3 minutes ago, Spider said:

 

2016 575 exports billion

2023 859 export billion 

Edited March 31, 20242 yr by Mounts Kipper

1 minute ago, Mounts Kipper said:

2016 575 exports billion

2023 859 export billion 

Value.

Look it up.

And keep your head in the sand regarding how much more dogshit and red tape exists now

22 minutes ago, Spider said:

Value.

Look it up.

And keep your head in the sand regarding how much more dogshit and red tape exists now

Whose red tape is it?

9 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Whose red tape is it?

The EU's. That's the point, we should have stayed in the SM as per Dan Hannan who has now forgotten this for his peerage.

Or do you think we should have some special dispensation, what being Britain and all that?

Edited March 31, 20242 yr by Winchester White

12 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Whose red tape is it?

Did you not know we'd be treated as a third-country when you voted for us to become a third-country?

6 minutes ago, Cheese said:

Did you not know we'd be treated as a third-country when you voted for us to become a third-country?

They need us more than we need them, apparently, so it might have come as a surprise to him

1 hour ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Whose red tape is it?

Stop drinking turps 😁

1 hour ago, Spider said:

Stop drinking turps 😁

He would do but the EU told him it was a bad idea so now he can't stop just to show those unelected beurocrats in Brussels what for.

Edited March 31, 20242 yr by frank_spencer

Bitter remoaners. Seems they will never go away.

3 hours ago, Winchester White said:

The EU's. That's the point, we should have stayed in the SM as per Dan Hannan who has now forgotten this for his peerage.

Or do you think we should have some special dispensation, what being Britain and all that?

I don’t give a toss to be honest, our exports are on an upward trajectory they tried stop us leaving, failed, and project fears predictions were found to be a lie. 🇬🇧 

6 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I don’t give a toss to be honest, our exports are on an upward trajectory they tried stop us leaving, failed, and project fears predictions were found to be a lie. 🇬🇧 

You do know "Project Fear" was a term created and perpetuated by the Leave campaigns, don't you? It wasn't an actual thing.

“Pint of €2 Fosters please Manuel”

 

Edited April 1, 20242 yr by Spider

So 50% more than can go to Rwanda arrived yesterday

Shambles

6 hours ago, Casino said:

So 50% more than can go to Rwanda arrived yesterday

Shambles

You miss the point of Rwanda.. it’s meant to be a deterrent to stop folk from attempting the crossing. It was never meant to house all those who arrived here. 

52 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

You miss the point of Rwanda.. it’s meant to be a deterrent to stop folk from attempting the crossing. It was never meant to house all those who arrived here. 

Stop being sensible. It spoils his propaganda. I see channel crossing illegals are up 43% over the same period last year. He must be terribly excited. I wonder if he has a spare room? I'll bet Gary Lineker has more than one.

3 hours ago, Mounts Kipper said:

You miss the point of Rwanda.. it’s meant to be a deterrent to stop folk from attempting the crossing. It was never meant to house all those who arrived here. 

How is it a deterrent if Rwanda is a perfectly safe country, and there's a less than 2% chance they'll end up there anyway?

Edited April 2, 20242 yr by Cheese

3 hours ago, Cheese said:

How is it a deterrent if Rwanda is a perfectly safe country, and there's a less than 2% chance they'll end up there anyway?

🤦🏻

3 hours ago, Cheese said:

How is it a deterrent if Rwanda is a perfectly safe country, and there's a less than 2% chance they'll end up there anyway?

2% is a massive exaggeration

Its way, way less than 2%

Deterrent my arse, nothing more than a (very expensive) vanity project

 

8 hours ago, Mounts Kipper said:

You miss the point of Rwanda.. it’s meant to be a deterrent to stop folk from attempting the crossing. It was never meant to house all those who arrived here. 

I'm not sure anybody really thinks that it'll stop anybody making the crossing, if it ever actually happens, which it won't. When it originally was mentioned, I know some thought it was a good idea, I'll bet there are very few, if any, members of the general public who think we should still be pursuing this

The amount of money it's costing is utterly ridiculous, especially as we all know nobody will ever be sent there - I think we've already sent Rwanda the best part of £250M in return for zero people, apparently if/when we do send the 300 asylum seekers over there, it'll have cost a grand total of £580M - that's nearly £2M a person.

2 hours ago, Sweep said:

I'm not sure anybody really thinks that it'll stop anybody making the crossing, if it ever actually happens, which it won't. When it originally was mentioned, I know some thought it was a good idea, I'll bet there are very few, if any, members of the general public who think we should still be pursuing this

The amount of money it's costing is utterly ridiculous, especially as we all know nobody will ever be sent there - I think we've already sent Rwanda the best part of £250M in return for zero people, apparently if/when we do send the 300 asylum seekers over there, it'll have cost a grand total of £580M - that's nearly £2M a person.

I’m not defending it, think it’s now complete waste of time and money. I was just pointing out that it was never meant to be a solution to get rid of a significant number of illegals. 

2 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

I’m not defending it, think it’s now complete waste of time and money. I was just pointing out that it was never meant to be a solution to get rid of a significant number of illegals. 

I agree with that, but I also don't really see how it was ever going to be a deterrent to people making the crossing either - it's just been a massive cock up from start to finish, and yet they still won't let it go and just give it up as a bad job

42 minutes ago, Sweep said:

I agree with that, but I also don't really see how it was ever going to be a deterrent to people making the crossing either - it's just been a massive cock up from start to finish, and yet they still won't let it go and just give it up as a bad job

It’s symptomatic of this bunch of Tories, protecting tax payers money and seeking value doesn’t come into it, they’ll spend whatever it takes to protect the Tory party, or grease the palms of their own. 

Aren’t deterrents supposed to STOP things happening?

Crossings up 80%?

Someone somewhere is getting this all wrong.

 

13 minutes ago, Spider said:

Aren’t deterrents supposed to STOP things happening?

Crossings up 80%?

Someone somewhere is getting this all wrong.

 

Lefty lawyers mate

If im willing to cross the channel on a fucking lilo, going to rwanda isnt going to stop me

Id be back in a few months