Love him or hate him the lads got some nuts, caught this lad a cracker here.

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_BNP2y7ELus&feature=youtu.be

31 minutes ago, royal white said:

Of all the charges have any of them been done for race/hate crimes? 

Ooooh, C....you’re on a roll tonight sir......:D

 

Splendid work buddy.

11 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

Ooooh, C....you’re on a roll tonight sir......:D

 

Splendid work buddy.

It’s madness, if 20 white blokes had for years groomed, assaulted and raped dozens and dozens of black kids every headline would have been “racist paedophiles’ 

 

And another few years added to the sentence! 

Edited October 19, 20187 yr by royal white

11 minutes ago, royal white said:

It’s madness, if 20 white blokes had for years groomed, assaulted and raped dozens and dozens of black kids every headline would have been “racist paedophiles’ 

 

And another few years added to the sentence! 

Cmon mate that is seriously harsh ,i think you need to use the preferred media term of grooming gang  as if they were taking them for a day out at Alton Towers with lashings of ice cream

1 minute ago, crawshawbooth said:

Cmon mate that is seriously harsh ,i think you need to use the preferred media term of grooming gang  as if they were taking them for a day out at Alton Towers with lashings of ice cream

Whilst giving them new hairdos & make up tips

16 minutes ago, royal white said:

It’s madness, if 20 white blokes had for years groomed, assaulted and raped dozens and dozens of black kids every headline would have been “racist paedophiles’ 

 

And another few years added to the sentence! 

Can’t fault you there C......is Honkys would have been lynched by now

grooming gang sounds about as bad as it gets in my opinion. 

it certainly doesn't leave much doubt.

1 hour ago, crawshawbooth said:

The whole of that continent think we are bound by western law that prevents us looking after young females in our society and it is just fresh meat for them to rape repeatedly

Quite possibly the dumbest sentence I've ever read on WW and that's a hell of a claim to fame. 

3 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Quite possibly the dumbest sentence I've ever read on WW and that's a hell of a claim to fame. 

Aye the majority of these filth come from a Pakistani background not sure you can lump south Korea and Israel in with them. 

3 minutes ago, frank_spencer said:

Aye the majority of these filth come from a Pakistani background not sure you can lump south Korea and Israel in with them. 

Israel are in Eurovision so they are deffo not paedos, and even in the Euro footy championship

Edited October 19, 20187 yr by Alf Hartigan

3 minutes ago, frank_spencer said:

Aye the majority of these filth come from a Pakistani background not sure you can lump south Korea and Israel in with them. 

I doubt the Japs or most of Russia are that happy either

Still all 4.463 billion of them are hell bent on repeatedly raping our young females. 

Anyway - glad these cunts have been put away. 

10 hours ago, miamiwhite said:

Imagine the judge hearing all the case then releasing them on bail and one of them flees the country to Pakistan eh ?

 

Soap opera ! No...that’s what happened.

Unbelievable how these 20 men were allowed back on to the streets and in to contact with children while awaiting sentence. 

One's fled the country (and sentenced to 17 years in his absence).

Same case, same judge sent Tommy Robinson sent straight down the day he was arrested... 

 

 

1 hour ago, darwen_white said:

Unbelievable how these 20 men were allowed back on to the streets and in to contact with children while awaiting sentence. 

One's fled the country (and sentenced to 17 years in his absence).

Same case, same judge sent Tommy Robinson sent straight down the day he was arrested... 

 

 

Yes - for acting in a way that could have led to all 20 men being allowed back on the streets.

38 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Yes - for acting in a way that could have led to all 20 men being allowed back on the streets.

What way was that? Why was he released from jail early if he fucked yo so badly? 

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/why-tommy-robinson-owes-huddersfield-grooming-gang-victims-an-apology-1-9405835

17 minutes ago, gonzo said:

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/why-tommy-robinson-owes-huddersfield-grooming-gang-victims-an-apology-1-9405835

Puts it more eloquently than I ever could!

Crazy how in 2018 the laws would let some bloke on his iPhone have any influence over a multi million pound court case stacked with evidence against the accused. 

 

What a sad age we live in 

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

Crazy how in 2018 the laws would let some bloke on his iPhone have any influence over a multi million pound court case stacked with evidence against the accused. 

 

What a sad age we live in 

This was trial by jury. A jury is made up of the citizenry. A fair proportion of that citizenry believes anything Tommy Robinson tells them to. 

Do you accept that if anybody on the jury that convicted these men had perhaps been on an EDL march in the past, or had perhaps 'liked'  Tommy Robinson on Facebook - the case for defence would have made out that TR influenced their deliberations?

1 minute ago, kent_white said:

This was trial by jury. A jury is made up of the citizenry. A fair proportion of that citizenry believes anything Tommy Robinson tells them to. 

Do you accept that if anybody on the jury that convicted these men had perhaps been on an EDL march in the past, or had perhaps 'liked'  Tommy Robinson on Facebook - the case for defence would have made out that TR influenced their deliberations?

And if you believed anybody who is against TR you would think all of his followers were racists knuckle draggers, so if and Tommy fans or EDL marchers were on the jury they may have already made up their mind when everyone of the charged was named along with their addresses weeks before by the BBC and other media outlets! 

So in reality he could have easily shared that link to his 100s of thousands of followers on social media and not broken any laws. 

1 hour ago, royal white said:

And if you believed anybody who is against TR you would think all of his followers were racists knuckle draggers, so if and Tommy fans or EDL marchers were on the jury they may have already made up their mind when everyone of the charged was named along with their addresses weeks before by the BBC and other media outlets! 

So in reality he could have easily shared that link to his 100s of thousands of followers on social media and not broken any laws. 

But also in reality - he chose not share a link. He chose to stand outside the court broadcasting on Facebook live or whatever. 

So again - can you see how the case for the defence might have been able to use that to their advantage? 

3 minutes ago, kent_white said:

But also in reality - he chose not share a link. He chose to stand outside the court broadcasting on Facebook live or whatever. 

So again - can you see how the case for the defence might have been able to use that to their advantage? 

Time for an ace card now Spunky.

 

The judge and CPS said in trial conscripts that nothing TR said could have prejudiced the case.

 

yes...the judge and CPS have said that.

 

Care to comment my now my intelligent little Ductch Detective....(Clever Clogs)

 

Facts will always smash your bollocks.

 

Milego dnia x

 

3 hours ago, gonzo said:

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/why-tommy-robinson-owes-huddersfield-grooming-gang-victims-an-apology-1-9405835

No insult mate, but that reporter Stephanie Finnegan has been proven to be one hell of a biased liar with her reporting.

 

See my post above for the clearest reason why.

5 hours ago, kent_white said:

Yes - for acting in a way that could have led to all 20 men being allowed back on the streets.

Read my post re the judge and CPS comments.....you may not like my FACTS....

 

Silly boy.

You know what I'm going to say now don't you? 

Had a quick look through the judges summing up from the court of appeal and I can't find anything that says he couldn't have prejudiced the case. 

Happy to be proven wrong if I am. 

And less of the 'boy' please. I'm in my 40's.

 

55 minutes ago, kent_white said:

But also in reality - he chose not share a link. He chose to stand outside the court broadcasting on Facebook live or whatever. 

So again - can you see how the case for the defence might have been able to use that to their advantage? 

So a TR live feed which sometimes attracts 5-6k viewers with no guarantee any of the jury may have seen it. 

 

or all of them named on the BBC weeks before which more than likely the jury would of had a nosey at!

 

10 minutes ago, kent_white said:

You know what I'm going to say now don't you? 

Had a quick look through the judges summing up from the court of appeal and I can't find anything that says he couldn't have prejudiced the case. 

Happy to be proven wrong if I am. 

And less of the 'boy' please. I'm in my 40's.

 

Haha...how obvious....you find the link son....it’s out there.