6 coppers to take him down or 1 member of the public with his bike? 
 

 

 

3 hours ago, Chadderton said:

Never squeeze the tea bag.

Post of the month right there, lads.

11 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

For you, sadly I am. Which is why you are looking a bit daft with this one.

You are trying to make an emotional point to suggest I'd like someone who has done something unspeakable to live.

However, that isn't the real issue. 

You'd like a shooting squad from the courtroom. There are reasons why this doesn't happen.

You then suggest is saves 'millions' Which it doesn't.

Again, you are making overly simplistic points and dress it up as common sense of which isn't.

I suggest you, do a bit more of that reading rather than gut reactions. 

“Im a good reader” 😂😂

Then what are you on about when you’re saying “that’s not what he asked” when he clearly didn’t ask anything? 
 

google is telling me 53k a year, what’s it telling you? 
 

@zico what are you about Saria law? 

9 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Given the lawyers costs, and the legality it would cost far more.

What RW wants is a bullet to the head upon conviction.

Wrong again. Hanging within 24hrs 

38 minutes ago, royal white said:

 

@zico what are you about Saria law? 

What am I on about? 

I'm saying this is the type of law you want in relation to death penalties

They will kill within hours or days of a conviction 

It's not for me but you appear to be a fan

It's a backwards and primitive approach to punishment imo

2 minutes ago, Zico said:

What am I on about? 

I'm saying this is the type of law you want in relation to death penalties

They will kill within hours or days of a conviction 

It's not for me but you appear to be a fan

It's a backwards and primitive approach to punishment imo

Singapore do it pretty quick and I’m sure their courts aren’t sharia? The same with China.

1 hour ago, Not in Crawley said:

Financially it doesnt save 'millions'

So given it doesn't work as a deterrent, and doesn't hugely save money, why would you reinstate it, other than it'd make you feel that justice has been served?

 

1 hour ago, DazBob said:

So you actually think of the Southport killer was sentenced to death it would save us millions?? Haha.

You do know the cost per prisoner is worked out on cost absorption don't you?

Whilst there would undoubtedly be a saving, it certainly wouldn't go anywhere near 'millions'

 

He's had a bit of a shocker tonight eh

work out the maths boys 😂

5 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

 

He's had a bit of a shocker tonight eh

work out the maths boys 😂

Looks like another who struggles to read. Give them a hand with the maths, there’s a good lad. 

53 minutes ago, royal white said:

Wrong again. Hanging within 24hrs 

Maybe you should perhaps have a look into hanging as well, whilst you read up on criminal justice?

And we wonder what happens when people don't study history.

Just now, royal white said:

Looks like another who struggles to read. Give them a hand with the maths, there’s a good lad. 

Trying to patronise when positing nonsense isn't a great look.

9 minutes ago, royal white said:

Singapore do it pretty quick and I’m sure their courts aren’t sharia? The same with China.

I just googled those countries 

China give a two year reprieve 

Singapore kill folk for drug trafficking as well

So you're on the same page as Sharia law and Singapore as things stand

I'm sure there are others too 

15 minutes ago, royal white said:

Singapore do it pretty quick and I’m sure their courts aren’t sharia? The same with China.

Singapore have the death penalty for relatively small amounts of drug supply.

Are you sure you don't want to live under a repressive regime? It certainly sounds like it.

2 minutes ago, Zico said:

I just googled those countries 

China give a two year reprieve 

Singapore kill folk for drug trafficking as well

So you're on the same page as Sharia law and Singapore as things stand

I'm sure there are others too 

 Not all Countries that practice sharia law have the death penalty. I don’t want people killed for drug trafficking. Why you have brought sharia law into this is weird. 

Just now, royal white said:

 Not all Countries that practice sharia law have the death penalty. I don’t want people killed for drug trafficking. Why you have brought sharia law into this is weird. 

Then why mention Singapore?

1 minute ago, Not in Crawley said:

Trying to patronise when positing nonsense isn't a great look.

saving millions 😂

what are we struggling to read exactly, his posts? 

He's not shared any evidence that it saves millions. Other than his own repeated claims and telling folk to work out the maths. 

Bit of late night entertainment. Leave him to it, maybe we'll get some proper proof overnight. 

4 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Trying to patronise when positing nonsense isn't a great look.

Just post the figures when you can and why you want people like the Southport killer and the Rigby killers to live. There’s a good lad 👍

1 minute ago, Not in Crawley said:

Then why mention Singapore?

You’re reading is shocking tonight isn’t it. 
 

1 minute ago, London Wanderer said:

saving millions 😂

what are we struggling to read exactly, his posts? 

He's not shared any evidence that it saves millions. Other than his own repeated claims and telling folk to work out the maths. 

Bit of late night entertainment. Leave him to it, maybe we'll get some proper proof overnight. 

Come on then sir, tell the class. How much to keep a prisoner inside for let’s say 40 years? 

Just now, royal white said:

Just post the figures when you can and why you want people like the Southport killer and the Rigby killers to live. There’s a good lad 👍

Again, just saying lad isn't a kiss off when you are wrong.

As I say, they are all there and available for you, just have a read. I also wasn't the one saying it would save millions, I suggest it's on you to prove what you are saying, is it not?

As for struggling to 'read' - I've already answered your overly emotional point about people comkiting unspeakable crimes.

It's on you now. Lad.

2 minutes ago, royal white said:

You’re reading is shocking tonight isn’t it. 
 

Again, you've mentioned Singapore- but yet you say you wouldn't want people to be killed for drug trafficking.

Please explain your reasoning for using this country as an example of why you support capital punishment.

4 minutes ago, royal white said:

Come on then sir, tell the class. How much to keep a prisoner inside for let’s say 40 years? 

Its all readily available- just a simple click away.

Just now, Not in Crawley said:

Again, just saying lad isn't a kiss off when you are wrong.

As I say, they are all there and available for you, just have a read. I also wasn't the one saying it would save millions, I suggest it's on you to prove what you are saying, is it not?

As for struggling to 'read' - I've already answered your overly emotional point about people comkiting unspeakable crimes.

It's on you now. Lad.

But you’ve not. 3 of you on here say it wouldn’t cost cost millions without giving a figure of what it does Cost. I have given  a figure of what it does cost but you’re choosing to ignore it. 
 

As for struggling to read, you are proving my point. You asked “why mention  Singapore” I mentioned Singapore because zico was saying a quick death penalty is a sharia thing when it’s quite obviously not.

1 minute ago, Not in Crawley said:

Its all readily available- just a simple click away.

It’s not. You need to do the maths which is obviously what you’re struggling on. 

Just now, royal white said:

But you’ve not. 3 of you on here say it wouldn’t cost cost millions without giving a figure of what it does Cost. I have given  a figure of what it does cost but you’re choosing to ignore it. 
 

As for struggling to read, you are proving my point. You asked “why mention  Singapore” I mentioned Singapore because zico was saying a quick death penalty is a sharia thing when it’s quite obviously not.

Right, one last time (with feeling) you haven't given any costs - and it's all readily available. 

Also you've said tonight you want people going from conviction to death as quickly as possible. Which is just a nonsense.

So, it doesn't save money, it doesn't stop crime. Again, why do you want capital punishment other than to emotionally make you feel better? You've still not managed to get round to that one.

As for Singapore - that's quite a misunderstanding of what Zico's point was.

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

It’s not. You need to do the maths which is obviously what you’re struggling on. 

God, this is boring. Do a bit of reading. It's not that difficult.

6 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Right, one last time (with feeling) you haven't given any costs - and it's all readily available. 

Also you've said tonight you want people going from conviction to death as quickly as possible. Which is just a nonsense.

So, it doesn't save money, it doesn't stop crime. Again, why do you want capital punishment other than to emotionally make you feel better? You've still not managed to get round to that one.

As for Singapore - that's quite a misunderstanding of what Zico's point was.

Ai seems to be the way forward on here now, let’s see what it says. Oh and I’ve not misunderstood anyone’s point lad, 

 

Edited May 14, 20251 yr by royal white