Threats to owners, sit in protest. 

deluded cunts.

fuck em.

 

39 minutes ago, Pablo said:

Can't sue other clubs, not allowed.

Seems odd that Leicester etc had threatened to sue the prospective new owners if it's such common knowledge that you can't 

6 minutes ago, radcliffe white said:

Take it other clubs will be after compensation now 

They don't have any case because it applies to the 20/21 season where we would have finished 12th instead of 10th with 10 points knocked off

4 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

Seems odd that Leicester etc had threatened to sue the prospective new owners if it's such common knowledge that you can't 

Because the Daily mail says so !?!

 

BTW Leicester also have charges pending.

Edited November 17, 20232 yr by Pablo

6 minutes ago, Pablo said:

Because the Daily mail says so !?!

 

BTW Leicester also have charges pending.

The chair of the commission, David Phillips KC, also referenced applications for financial compensation from current Premier League clubs Burnley and Nottingham Forest and last season's relegated sides, Leicester City, Leeds United and Southampton

2 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

The chair of the commission, David Phillips KC, also referenced applications for financial compensation from current Premier League clubs Burnley and Nottingham Forest and last season's relegated sides, Leicester City, Leeds United and Southampton

Seems funny than, becuase we finished 10th the season these charges are from....

12 minutes ago, Pablo said:

They don't have any case because it applies to the 20/21 season where we would have finished 12th instead of 10th with 10 points knocked off

what about a club you beat (obvs, wont be many) cos you cheated and it relegated them

and its not like all those players were only available in one year

Just now, Casino said:

what about a club you beat (obvs, wont be many) cos you cheated and it relegated them

and its not like all those players were only available in one year

How did we cheat ?

By spending £20 million more than we should on the ground during covid ??

4 minutes ago, Pablo said:

Seems funny than, becuase we finished 10th the season these charges are from....

What happened the season after? 

Assume these players were still contracted 

3 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

What happened the season after? 

Assume these players were still contracted 

What have player got to do with it ?

The extra money was spent on the ground during covid.

4 minutes ago, Pablo said:

How did we cheat ?

By spending £20 million more than we should on the ground during covid ??

Sounds a bit more than that 

Explaining why Everton's points deduction was so high, the independent commission said in its written reasons that the cause of the club's issues was because of overspending - largely on new players - along with an inability to sell players, and a lower than projected league finish. The club's 16th-place finish in 2021-22 caused a loss of expected income of about £21m, the reasons state.

The commission added: "Everton's understandable desire to improve its on-pitch performance (to replace the non-existent midfield, as Mr Moshiri put it in evidence) led it to take chances with its PSR position.

"Those chances resulted in it exceeding the £105m threshold by £19.5m.

"The position that Everton finds itself in is of its own making. The excess over the threshold is significant. The consequence is that Everton's culpability is great.

"We take into account the fact that Everton's PSR trend over the relevant four years is positive, but cannot ignore the fact that the failure to comply with the PSR regime was the result of Everton irresponsibly taking a chance that things would turn out positively."

1 hour ago, Pablo said:

Nah, if you don't go down, you don't deserve to go down. End of story.

If you go down, you don't belong in that league, thats what the 38 games over a season are for mate.

😁

Aye, but Hans Segers, our non goal, etc. You’ve been lucky mo’fos on numerous occasions 😃

Just now, mickbrown said:

Aye, but Hans Segers, our non goal, etc. You’ve been lucky mo’fos on numerous occasions 😃

Lucky.....hell yeah.

But you didn't go down because of that "goal".

5 minutes ago, Pablo said:

What have player got to do with it ?

The extra money was spent on the ground during covid.

See above 

1 hour ago, DirtySanchez said:

Probably won't get 40 points between them 

This, isn't it. Everton had enough points on 14 already to stay up.

They'll manage just fine.

27 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

See above 

The same outcome also said we gained no sporting advantage.

2 minutes ago, Pablo said:

The same outcome also said we gained no sporting advantage.

You said it was £20m spend on the ground where as the commission found otherwise 

Maybe they decided you bought absolute shite 

You also suggested that suggestions of compensation where because the Daily Mail said so 

Yet the chair of the commission acknowledged this 

They'll argue it down to 3 points and City will get the same and they'll all accept it, as it probably won't have any impact to anybody

1 hour ago, Big E said:

Because the fact it’s all been done so quickly. Chelsea and city have been being investigate for a lot longer.

 

same with the way they dish out stuff to Wigan and reading. Its bollocks. They should have dealt with city by now 

Says who exactly?

Best will in the world, you're not carrying out the investigation. 

If it's true that 114 charges are lodged against city, then presumably that will take some time.

Perhaps the Everton case was much easier to determine, but that doesn't mean the others won't be sorted. What is important is to make the case watertight, so as to avoid any legal challenges ruining it. 

10 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Says who exactly?

Best will in the world, you're not carrying out the investigation. 

If it's true that 114 charges are lodged against city, then presumably that will take some time.

Perhaps the Everton case was much easier to determine, but that doesn't mean the others won't be sorted. What is important is to make the case watertight, so as to avoid any legal challenges ruining it. 

They could take 10pts off Citeh & they'd be still able to win the league.

56 minutes ago, Pablo said:

The same outcome also said we gained no sporting advantage.

Because the money was spent on absolute garbage ?

 

I can't wait. Once in a generation talent this girl.

45 minutes ago, Marc505 said:

 

I can't wait. Once in a generation talent this girl.

Fucking hell

Did she do Chelsea?

4 hours ago, Big E said:

absolutely outrageous that. Chelsea and City far worse. FA in utter bollocks shocker

This

I'd be all for it if there was consistency. 

Based on this latest outcome you'd expect City and Chelsea to be kicked out the league. 

Not got much sympathy for Everton, but I don’t have it in for them either , no doubt they’ll bounce back if the worst comes to the worst.

Agree with Pablo that non-goal didn’t get us relegated , given Everton we’re lucky to stay up. If we’d gone to Chelsea that season with the right attitude we’d have stayed up on the last day of the season instead of tamely rolling over.

8 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

This

I'd be all for it if there was consistency. 

Based on this latest outcome you'd expect City and Chelsea to be kicked out the league. 

As no decision nor punishment has been made yet, you cannot comment about a lack of consistency. 

Who knows, if found guilty, their punishments may well be more severe.

Another example of deciding a result without knowing the facts nor where the process is up to.