The Norpig Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 I thought we had a good 15/20 minute spell in the second half, seemed to be on top and pushing for a goal. Hindsight a little naive to change it then, but if Eagles comes on and scores it would of been a brilliant change. Live and die by your decisions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUREADY2ROLL Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 You are right we were on top and looking most likely to score - unfortunately Ngog is gash and it was him who should have come off; a SKD/ Klasnic partnership would then have done it. The decision to take Muamba off lost us the game (2 bad passes and thats the reason Coyle made that decision) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 Live and die by your decisions. You do indeed, that's why Coyle's dying on his arse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 You are right we were on top and looking most likely to score - unfortunately Ngog is gash and it was him who should have come off; a SKD/ Klasnic partnership would then have done it. The decision to take Muamba off lost us the game (2 bad passes and thats the reason Coyle made that decision) Like it has done for the rest of our splendid season? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUREADY2ROLL Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 Like it has done for the rest of our splendid season? You always miss the point The mistake was to take off Muamba Ngog was awful all the game and although we were pushing for a winner the only change should have been SKD for Ngog which may have done it on the day, 0-0 would have been better than losing Of course SKD has been like a carthorse this season but Ngog was getting nowhere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter HomerJay Posted December 28, 2011 Site Supporter Share Posted December 28, 2011 Ngog was shite but that wasn't entirely his fault was it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 N'Gog may not have been great but he's still offered more than Davies has all season in the last few games. His movement was one of the factors that enabled us to win against Blackburn. Or has N'Gog joined the 'can do no right list'? Steinsson used to be on it now he's viewed as the 2nd coming of Cafu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ex_midlandwhite Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 Steinsson used to be on it now he's viewed as the 2nd coming of Cafu. In the same way Muamba became the new Makele by virtue of not being in the team. The fact Muamba is now appreciated is the sole positive of our abysmal spell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 In the same way Muamba became the new Makele by virtue of not being in the team. The fact Muamba is now appreciated is the sole positive of our abysmal spell. Spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 In the same way Muamba became the new Makele by virtue of not being in the team. The fact Muamba is now appreciated is the sole positive of our abysmal spell. That's because you don't know what you've got until it has gone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passmosster Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 Steinsson used to be on it now he's viewed as the 2nd coming of Cafu. Immediately he came on at Fulham for Boyata, the defence looked miles better. If Coyle prefers Boyata to him, we have serious management problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 ...we have serious management problems. 30 odd superfluous words removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloria Stitz Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 Its either all or nothing with Muamba. His being in the side either works like a charm or makes the team entirely dysfunctional. He needs to start against Wolves. Steinsson or Boyata? No real preference. They're both liabilities. Thanks for reading, Gloria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughmungus Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 Think one or two on jere thought I was being a doom merchant when I questioned the signings of NGog, Pratley, Eagles etc as imo they where never likely to be the quality we needed, so whats the argument now for telling me I was wrong. Ive seen nothing to convince me otherwise. Shite signings by Coyle so he should take the blame and bow out with a bit of his reputation intact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloria Stitz Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 My feeling when we signed N'Gog was one of disinspiration (is that a word? It is now!). An improvement on KD, I thought, but that's all. He won't ever be seen producing match-turning magic, and how he managed nearly 100 appearances for Liverpool is beyond me, but with a kick up the arse he could be influential. If Coyle drops him, he's a bigger fool than first anticipated. Thanks for reading, Gloria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anewman Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 My feeling when we signed N'Gog was one of disinspiration (is that a word? It is now!). An improvement on KD, I thought, but that's all. He won't ever be seen producing match-turning magic, and how he managed nearly 100 appearances for Liverpool is beyond me, but with a kick up the arse he could be influential. If Coyle drops him, he's a bigger fool than first anticipated. Thanks for reading, Gloria. the N'Gog signing was a signing to appease the fans for lack of transfer activity, was a gamble like taking Sturridge. Sturridge was a good gamble where as N'Gog was just a plain fuckin stupid one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloria Stitz Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 anewman, on what level was Sturridge a real gamble? Gloria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anewman Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 anewman, on what level was Sturridge a real gamble? Gloria. he wasn't getting much games at chelsea so nobody really knew if he could step up but the fella did and now hes nailed down a regular slot at chelsea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloria Stitz Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 There wasn't a great deal to lose though was there? He obviously had something and wasn't on big money. Gloria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anewman Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 There wasn't a great deal to lose though was there? He obviously had something and wasn't on big money. Gloria. Sturridge or N'Gog? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloria Stitz Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 What's your point anewman? Gloria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wanderer Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 Gloria darling, your forgetting something...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 Gloria darling, your forgetting something...... Don't encourage him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anewman Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 What's your point anewman? Gloria. wtf you on about, you made a statement with no names mentioned, were you referring to sturridge or n'gog? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloria Stitz Posted December 28, 2011 Share Posted December 28, 2011 wtf you on about, you made a statement with no names mentioned, were you referring to sturridge or n'gog? No need to burst a vessel, " He obviously had something and wasn't on big money." was in reference to Sturridge. Gloria. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.