I like many of you watched England v Holland on Wednesday and I am sure many will agree there where some positives from the younger players but we need some drastic inprovement to catch up with the likes of Germany and Holland.

My question is as follows is Redknapp what we need? If not what is the alternative?

Mourinho for me.

 

Bloke wins stuff wherever he his

megson for me.

Edited March 2, 201214 yr by Frandsen08

Dodgy cnut or not, he's the best English candidate by a country mile.

 

Anyone who thinks Mourinho would be interested is deluded. He only takes jobs where he knows he's got either the players or the money to bring in players to win things. With England he'd have neither and it would serve to only put a black mark against his impeccable CV.

I wouldnt say he is the best English candidate at all. England don't have the number of world class players that other countries have so the best we can hope for is a manager who can gets the best out of what he has got (Redknapp ticks that box) and set up a tactical plan to play to the strengths of his team and weakness of the opposition (I don't think Redknapp has demonstrated he can do this).

 

Allardyce in my view has proven he can do both better than Redknapp.

I wouldnt say he is the best English candidate at all. England don't have the number of world class players that other countries have so the best we can hope for is a manager who can gets the best out of what he has got (Redknapp ticks that box) and set up a tactical plan to play to the strengths of his team and weakness of the opposition (I don't think Redknapp has demonstrated he can do this).

 

Allardyce in my view has proven he can do both better than Redknapp.

 

All good and well but as soon as 1 player hits 1 ball long the media would be all over him. The media want Redknapp and will love him until we inevitably don't win the first competition he manages then the witch hunt will begin.

A bit like OC coming here, it has now been set up so that anyone else would be a dissapointment.

 

A bit like OC coming here, think it will all end in tears.

 

Unlike OC coming here redknapp is one dodgy twitchy faced fucker, with great PR. He has spent a fortune at Spurs but the media make out it has been delivered on a shoestring.

Dodgy cnut or not, he's the best English candidate by a country mile.

 

Anyone who thinks Mourinho would be interested is deluded. He only takes jobs where he knows he's got either the players or the money to bring in players to win things. With England he'd have neither and it would serve to only put a black mark against his impeccable CV.

 

Never said he was interested, I said that's who I'd want.

Never said he was interested, I said that's who I'd want.

 

Never said you did mate.

 

FWIW I too would want him as manager.

 

I'd also like Kelly Brook to be my bird too.

 

Edit: Yes I know. Rules are rules.

 

Edited March 2, 201214 yr by DazBobParr

Mourinho for me.

 

Bloke wins stuff wherever he his

 

 

Don't tease.

I've changed my mind, I want Kelly Brook as England manager.

I just want Kelly Brook as my bird and to be England manager, just imagine consolling her when we get battered

Just imagine her saying, "Sorry, no soapy tit-wank for you tonight, I've got tic-tacs to plan"

I will show her a tic tac right up the old fucking brown eye, learn her attacking from the rear

He cant buy anyone for England, so for that reason iamout and how can someone who cant read and write manage the National Team?

He's the man for the job, unless we go foreign, but then who? Mourinho would be the dream, but he'd want club football in England over the National side.

big sam?

Is he the best for the job?

 

His record in the big games suggests otherwise.

Yes.

 

Because I want Moyes to fuck off to Spurs.

Never said you did mate.

 

FWIW I too would want him as manager.

 

I'd also like Kelly Brook to be my bird too.

 

Edit: Yes I know. Rules are rules.

 

 

2 up front and one in the hole behind?

his horse died yesterday

 

i sicken myself, but i smiled

Does it matter who manages England?

 

No matter who takes charge he has the same dross of players to choose from; its development of the youth that reallly gets us to the top of international football.

 

We might as well have a part time manager or even a part time committee to select a squad then somebody to organise it on the night; we wouldn't do any worse.

so tactics don't come into it?

 

i think you're talking shite, owen

 

the players are quite clearly not 'shite'

 

they under perform for england...regularly

 

thats down to the manager

so tactics don't come into it?

 

i think you're talking shite, owen

 

the players are quite clearly not 'shite'

 

they under perform for england...regularly

 

thats down to the manager

 

It dont take ?6million per year for someone to sort tactics out with international standard players

 

If the players are good enough and any half decent manager puts a formation together which suits the players available then they will do their best. Against far superior players they will still lose. Like Bolton against City

 

I agree with an idiot in charge not knowing his players strengths and weaknesses can turn a chance of winning into a loss. Eg. Bolton vs Wigan

Owen Coyle perhaps?

Would a former popular player with little or no management expreience with a good coaching team behind him work?

 

I.e. Klinsmann at Germany, Dunga at Brazil or Bilic at Croatia.

 

Beckham? Shearer?

 

Waiting for someone to suggest Gascoigne or point out Stuart Pearce.