What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

14 minutes ago, royal white said:

Rawanda

Is that near Rwanda?

2 minutes ago, Cheese said:

Is that near Rwanda?

No

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

We don’t need to part of an agreement for Albania. If they’re here illegally they can be deported, like most other nationals .

Bloody hell, you're a quick reader.

4 minutes ago, royal white said:

We don’t need to part of an agreement for Albania. If they’re here illegally they can be deported, like most other nationals .

So why isn’t that happening?

Just now, Spider said:

So why isn’t that happening?

It is

2 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Bloody hell, you're a quick reader.

You don’t need to be to point out the obvious. 

1 minute ago, royal white said:

You don’t need to be to point out the obvious. 

Aye, ok then.

You know best.

2 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Aye, ok then.

You know best.

So how/why did almost 1500 Albanians go back to Albanian between Sept 2001-Sept 2002? 

4 minutes ago, Spider said:

So why isn’t that happening?

Because we're not processing quick enough and have left the EU so our renationalisation policy is almost on a starting again footing.

Anyone who says it is hasn't read...ah, you get the jist.

or maybe put those loons who run Migration Watch onto the case.

I know controlling borders was a big Brexit Benefit.

You’d think Rees Mogg would have this attached to him on a sandwich board, but for some reason he doesn’t.

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

So how/why did almost 1500 Albanians go back to Albanian between Sept 2001-Sept 2002? 

So it’s working then?

Why all the fuss?

2 minutes ago, royal white said:

So how/why did almost 1500 Albanians go back to Albanian between Sept 2001-Sept 2002? 

No one said we couldn't repatriate, its the numbers that are the issue, and that does come down to policy.

See, when you have a little read up, its easy to point out the obvious.

Hang on, I know what’ll calm the ex pats down.

Hooray🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

 

Just now, Spider said:

So it’s working then?

Why all the fuss?

I refer the good gentleman to my earlier post.

But lets not look at governmental home office failings, lets just stop the boats, eh, Spider? Stop trying to make it more complicate than it is. Honestly #obsessed.

I wonder why the Royal Navy blockage across the channel plan didn't work out? Seemed very sensible to me 😊

4 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

No one said we couldn't repatriate, its the numbers that are the issue, and that does come down to policy.

See, when you have a little read up, its easy to point out the obvious.

We have our own deal with Albania, not some agreement from 2006. If they shouldn’t be here they will be sent back….eventually, regardless if we are in the EU or not. 

So that’s the Albanians sorted, and they are a worry.

Who next?

2 minutes ago, Spider said:

So that’s the Albanians sorted, and they are a worry.

Who next?

ROI

1 minute ago, royal white said:

ROI

Here’s a thought.

Redirect all the boat folk to Northern Ireland.

it’s still the UK, so that means it’s lawful

Tell the Irish govt that’s the long term plan and indeed, we are welcoming even more migrants (maybe providing a ferry to pick them up in Calais and take them straight to Belfast.)

the IRA will probably decide they don’t want a United Ireland after all, we can give all boatfolk an even split of Celtic and rangers tops, and they have an open border so can come and go as they please between the UK and the EU.

Everyones a winner, aprés moi la deluge.

 

53 minutes ago, royal white said:

We have our own deal with Albania, not some agreement from 2006. If they shouldn’t be here they will be sent back….eventually, regardless if we are in the EU or not. 

We're trying to do a new one, but itll get kiboshed as folk have said and we're back to square one. As I say, just have a little read around.

The real issue isn't boats, it's boring home office administration.

And also, I personally don't want to be part of a country that doesn't have a proper and humane repatriation protocol. If I did, I'd move to Belarus.

You might want to, and also think the ECHR is a soft soap to correct and more hardline policies. That's your perogative. 

 

Sounds to me like the Tories are failing even their hardcore supporters.

 

6 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

We're trying to do a new one, but itll get kiboshed as folk have said and we're back to square one. As I say, just have a little read around.

The real issue isn't boats, it's boring home office administration.

And also, I personally don't want to be part of a country that doesn't have a proper and humane repatriation protocol. If I did, I'd move to Belarus.

You might want to, and also think the ECHR is a soft soap to correct and more hardline policies. That's your perogative. 

 

Trying to or already have? 

1 hour ago, Spider said:

Hang on, I know what’ll calm the ex pats down.

Hooray🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

 

Bolty dislikes this…

Edited March 8, 20233 yr by Jol_BWFC

7 minutes ago, royal white said:

Trying to or already have? 

Google

 

16 minutes ago, tyldesley_white said:

Google

 

I've done enough homework for him to copy.

3 hours ago, lobbypond said:

This government has taken a proper grim turn with the language they're using towards the people crossing the channel. It's all a bit nazi.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I dont like how using the term "lefty" in a derogatory way has just been normalised by the PM either. Whichever side of the debate you're on it doesn't really do much for rhe standard of discourse does it.