It's happening. 

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/17405193.bolton-wanderers-close-to-takeover-from-uk-based-consortium/

Thank fuck

The guy Fronting gaspard has no other active directorships and only one historic was was dissolved without trading. Doesn’t really look like a serious businessman with much wealth?

Just now, Inspector Goole said:

Well maybe that fake account with now 3 followers was me all along trying to get a point across ?

That makes you even sadder than originally thought.... wow!!

Some lengths people go to for a few followers and likes

1 minute ago, Howardroark said:

which article

Bolton News.... Gaspard Holdings Ltd

I assume Gaspard is Benny's group. They aren't linked to mine. 

 

Just now, Inspector Goole said:

Well maybe that fake account with now 3 followers was me all along trying to get a point across ?

Prove it then and I'll take it back. You were tweeting that account begging for information, so I don't believe you.

2 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

which article

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/17545208.mystery-buyer-says-deal-to-take-over-wanderers-is-on-the-verge/

2 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

which article

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/17545208.mystery-buyer-says-deal-to-take-over-wanderers-is-on-the-verge/

I've been following this, like many others, with extreme interest - and add my thanks to Howard for his insight.  The bit I'm missing in my head is - if we assume Bassini doesn't prove funds/pass FPP tests (if appropriate), then if liquidation is a better option financially for KA than selling to Howard's bidders, what would possibly sway KA to go with H's mob other than an improved offer from Howard's bidders, or a rare moment of conscience/PR concerns on behalf of KA? 

Howard - is there any legal obligation for KA to accept a lone bid from your mob rather than force the club into liquidation? 

Apologies if this has already been spelled out, and others have grasped it - but I've read the whole thread and I can't see it!

It’s a mystery 

 

https://youtu.be/ae_z580HyEI

Just now, Colonel Mustard said:

I've been following this, like many others, with extreme interest - and add my thanks to Howard for his insight.  The bit I'm missing in my head is - if we assume Bassini doesn't prove funds/pass FPP tests (if appropriate), then if liquidation is a better option financially for KA than selling to Howard's bidders, what would possibly sway KA to go with H's mob other than an improved offer from Howard's bidders, or a rare moment of conscience/PR concerns on behalf of KA? 

Howard - is there any legal obligation for KA to accept a lone bid from your mob rather than force the club into liquidation? 

Apologies if this has already been spelled out, and others have grasped it - but I've read the whole thread and I can't see it!

Howard can answer in more depth I'm sure, but I think what it comes down to is that Ken has been doing some dodgy antics. If he sells to Bassini, a blind eye will be turned to said antics and he gets off with his money. If he liquidates Bolton, there will be serious investigations likely to happen into his tenure which could find out some of his dodgy dealings and put him in hot water.

That's my reading of it anway.

2 minutes ago, Colonel Mustard said:

I've been following this, like many others, with extreme interest - and add my thanks to Howard for his insight.  The bit I'm missing in my head is - if we assume Bassini doesn't prove funds/pass FPP tests (if appropriate), then if liquidation is a better option financially for KA than selling to Howard's bidders, what would possibly sway KA to go with H's mob other than an improved offer from Howard's bidders, or a rare moment of conscience/PR concerns on behalf of KA? 

Howard - is there any legal obligation for KA to accept a lone bid from your mob rather than force the club into liquidation? 

Apologies if this has already been spelled out, and others have grasped it - but I've read the whole thread and I can't see it!

The only action would be retrospective, he cannot be forced to sell.

Has Howard's client's thrown in the towel now then? Not been able to keep up so much today. Someone do a summary!

https://forum.boltonnuts.co.uk/t16508-shabbir-khilji

 

found this, confirms south African connection. However lots of bullshit that never happened!!!

41 minutes ago, Dr Faustus said:

How many years business experience do you have?

 

I am to cynical to believe anything until I see it nowadays, this is no different. Fuck knows what will happen... all any of us can really do is wait and see

6 years pal, I thought that was the norm these day

4 minutes ago, Boothy said:

Has Howard's client's thrown in the towel now then? Not been able to keep up so much today. Someone do a summary!

Seems like Ken got the injunction, if there was ever one to get. Pushes Howard's buyers back a week. 

That's pretty much the only update apart from the BN article that just came out, but they sound clueless, so wouldn't buy into that. Chairman's notes too, usual shit. 

Edited April 2, 20197 yr by SilentBob

4 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

The only action would be retrospective, he cannot be forced to sell.

What would it realistically take for your boys to be back on?

1 minute ago, WestStandUpper said:

What would it realistically take for your boys to be back on?

Kathy Lloyd getting her pussy well oiled. With their spunk. 

2 minutes ago, WestStandUpper said:

What would it realistically take for your boys to be back on?

are you looking to chip in?

Just now, Dr Faustus said:

are you looking to chip in?

Aye... couple of quid each might make a big difference.

I mean, in terms of Ken backing down, adjournment tomorrow etc..

Nixon seems to be hinting that Gaspard are the ones Ken's calling out in this bit of the notes. 

"Unfortunately, there are several local individuals who are making themselves very busy talking to the media and anyone else who will listen, purporting to be buying the club.

I can categorically state that most of the names being mentioned on social media are people who might have expressed an interest, but have never been able to provide documentary evidence that they have the liquid cash funds.

Maybe, they are just waiting to say: “l offered to buy it”. I really don’t know, but l do wish they wouldn’t waste our time.

Indeed, one of the so called eligible buyers has been telling us he has the funds for over two years now without once showing acceptable proof of the funds."

Gets more complicated by the day, this.

And no further to any conclusive answers.

9 minutes ago, WestStandUpper said:

Aye... couple of quid each might make a big difference.

I mean, in terms of Ken backing down, adjournment tomorrow etc..

Only an adjournment tomorrow of longer than one week

Right what the fuck have I missed

Just now, Howardroark said:

Only an adjournment tomorrow of longer than one week

So Ken won't want one longer than that then?

1 minute ago, Howardroark said:

Only an adjournment tomorrow of longer than one week

Would an adjournment of one week only be too little?