6 coppers to take him down or 1 member of the public with his bike? 
 

 

 

You’ll all be pleased to know that this isn’t going away. 
 

But but but they pulled a flag down and sang songs 🙄

 

 

1 hour ago, royal white said:

You’ll all be pleased to know that this isn’t going away. 
 

But but but they pulled a flag down and sang songs 🙄

 

 

Let’s move on

19 minutes ago, Spider said:

Let’s move on

“Meanwhile in England”

11 hours ago, Spider said:

Let’s move on

Inshallah bro.

11 hours ago, Spider said:

Let’s move on

Agreed. Who cares what someone said 50 years ago or even 5 weeks ago. There’s no cut off is there. It’s all in the past. #witchhunts

He will be out in 12 months. So reassuring that our judges know what they’re doing.

 

 

Edited January 6Jan 6 by royal white

24 minutes ago, royal white said:

He will be out in 12 months. So reassuring that our judges no what they’re doing.

 

 

Sentencing for noncing and violent crimes are a joke in this country. Likely do more time getting rumbled flogging dodgy fire sticks

48 minutes ago, royal white said:

He will be out in 12 months. So reassuring that our judges no what they’re doing.

 

 

Aren't judges given guidelines for what they can send people down for? I know Magistrates are when it comes to handed out punishments 

So if he got sent down for 50 years, which we all would like, he could appeal and get two years maybe

Is it the Judge's fault? 

1 minute ago, DirtySanchez said:

Aren't judges given guidelines for what they can send people down for? I know Magistrates are when it comes to handed out punishments 

So if he got sent down for 50 years, which we all would like, he could appeal and get two years maybe

Is it the Judge's fault? 

Nope, it'll be Starmer or Lammy's fault 

Anyway, part of the punishment should be chemical castration, on top of whatever custodial sentence he's given

1 hour ago, DirtySanchez said:

Aren't judges given guidelines for what they can send people down for? I know Magistrates are when it comes to handed out punishments 

So if he got sent down for 50 years, which we all would like, he could appeal and get two years maybe

Is it the Judge's fault? 

This is where the appeals needs to be looked at, you get your sentence and that’s it, if the judges are supposed to know what they’re doing then what’s the grounds for appeals? Nobody shagging an 11 year old girl should get the right to appeal in my eyes. No doubt some will say “human rights” but human rights can get to fuck in situations like this 

4 minutes ago, royal white said:

This is where the appeals needs to be looked at, you get your sentence and that’s it, if the judges are supposed to know what they’re doing then what’s the grounds for appeals? Nobody shagging an 11 year old girl should get the right to appeal in my eyes. No doubt some will say “human rights” but human rights can get to fuck in situations like this 

Whatabout, whatabout 

You say Judges should know but they can only give a sentence in line with the guidelines and if a jury finds them guilty then they act accordingly 

You can't deny an appeal for anyone convicted of a crime just because you dont like it

Nothing to do with human rights but surely you agree everyone should be entitled to a fair trial? If that means someone gets accused of under age sex when they didn't, do you expect them to just shrug their shoulders, go off to prison with the nonce tag?

 

 

21 hours ago, royal white said:

You’ll all be pleased to know that this isn’t going away. 
 

But but but they pulled a flag down and sang songs 🙄

 

 

Gets even worse 🤔 

 

50 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

Whatabout, whatabout 

You say Judges should know but they can only give a sentence in line with the guidelines and if a jury finds them guilty then they act accordingly 

You can't deny an appeal for anyone convicted of a crime just because you dont like it

Nothing to do with human rights but surely you agree everyone should be entitled to a fair trial? If that means someone gets accused of under age sex when they didn't, do you expect them to just shrug their shoulders, go off to prison with the nonce tag?

 

 

There’s no whatabout there cocker. You’ve already said judges know better than us on previous threads so why would you question them now. 
 

Which part of this trial wasn’t fair? 

Just now, royal white said:

There’s no whatabout there cocker. You’ve already said judges know better than us on previous threads so why would you question them now. 
 

Which part of this trial wasn’t fair? 

Have i said judges know better other than knowking the law much better. What im saying is if they are found guilty judges pass down the sentence in accordance with the guidelines 

I've no idea whether the trial was fair or not 

That wasn't the point I was making 

1 minute ago, DirtySanchez said:

Have i said judges know better other than knowking the law much better. What im saying is if they are found guilty judges pass down the sentence in accordance with the guidelines 

I've no idea whether the trial was fair or not 

That wasn't the point I was making 

Why wouldn’t they be getting fair trials?

I’m sure most (probably not all for some Weird reason) would welcome this. 
 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jan/03/reform-uk-says-child-rapists-would-face-whole-life-jail-terms-if-elected

Just now, royal white said:

Why wouldn’t they be getting fair trials?

I never suggested they weren't 

1 minute ago, DirtySanchez said:

I never suggested they weren't 

You said everyone should be entitled to a fair trial. Where in the U.K. isn’t this happening? 

Just now, royal white said:

You said everyone should be entitled to a fair trial. Where in the U.K. isn’t this happening? 

Everyone does have the right to a fair trial 

You also have the right to appeal a trial decision 

You shouldn't be able to pick and choose which trials that relates to 

Whether that appeal is successful is another matter 

4 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

Everyone does have the right to a fair trial 

You also have the right to appeal a trial decision 

You shouldn't be able to pick and choose which trials that relates to 

Whether that appeal is successful is another matter 

They do, where in the U.K. isn’t that happening is what I asked. 

4 minutes ago, royal white said:

They do, where in the U.K. isn’t that happening is what I asked. 

Nobody shagging an 11 year old girl should get the right to appeal in my eyes

Your words, I never said anyone is getting the right to an appeal is not happening 

Edited January 6Jan 6 by DirtySanchez

5 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

Nobody shagging an 11 year old girl should get the right to appeal in my eyes

Your words, I never said anyone is getting the right to an appeal is not happening 

I think you’re confusing yourself here. Let’s try for a third time. Where in the U.K. aren’t they getting fair trials. 

4 hours ago, Sweep said:Anyway, part of the punishment should be chemical castration, on top of whatever custodial sentence he's given

I'm sure I read somewhere that they were considering trialling this as part of prisoner's release conditions. Voluntary though - not imposed. Presumably for a lighter sentence? 

Having said that - it may have just been a fever dream. 

4 hours ago, Sweep said:

Nope, it'll be Starmer or Lammy's fault 

Anyway, part of the punishment should be chemical castration, on top of whatever custodial sentence he's given

☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️

3 hours ago, DirtySanchez said:

Whatabout, whatabout 

You say Judges should know but they can only give a sentence in line with the guidelines and if a jury finds them guilty then they act accordingly 

You can't deny an appeal for anyone convicted of a crime just because you dont like it

Nothing to do with human rights but surely you agree everyone should be entitled to a fair trial? If that means someone gets accused of under age sex when they didn't, do you expect them to just shrug their shoulders, go off to prison with the nonce tag?

 

 

No I expect them to get a minimum of 15 years and a goos shoeing every day...... but hey im just an old fashioned gammon