reeto

 

we've got footballs two biggest twats on page 1, what with the cockney prick and red nose

 

only missing redknapp for a prile of 3s

 

anyway

 

terry

 

assuming he did use the two words hes alleged to have done, is it really so bad

 

if he'd called bartona white one, most folk would've agreed

 

and anton does come across as a peckham wannabee

 

and anton is black

 

 

posted this to liven up a dull friday afternoon, so behave yourselves

 

please

thought it was going to be about John Thomas....never mind

Remember his equalizer at Rochdale in 87?

I believe he also used the word "cunt" and all Ferdinands definetly fall into that category

 

Even Sir Les?

Franz?

In other news, he shouldn't be in that England squad on form, nevermind as a result of all this garbage.

Franz?

 

The German historian Michael Freund described Franz Ferdinand as "a man of uninspired energy, dark in appearance and emotion, who radiated an aura of strangeness and cast a shadow of violence and recklessness

 

His sometime admirer Karl Kraus put it, "he was not one who would greet you ... he felt no compulsion to reach out for the unexplored region which the Viennese call their heart."

 

His relations with Emperor Franz Joseph were tense; the emperor's personal servant recalled in his memoirs that "thunder and lightning always raged when they had their discussions."

 

 

 

Sounds a bit of a cunt to me.

In other news, he shouldn't be in that England squad on form, nevermind as a result of all this garbage.

 

Since when was form something that was taken into consideration when England squads are picked?

on the whole race thing at the minute....

 

whats this tiger woods ex caddy fella meant to have said?

He called Woods a black arsehole.

Or ass-hole in American.

The offending comment was "My aim was to shove it right up that black asshole".

I suppose if he'd said brown it wouldn't have caused the same offence, since they can all be described in that way (e.g. brown-nosing)?

Anyway, where else was he supposed to want to place Scott's winnings?

Since when was form something that was taken into consideration when England squads are picked?

 

 

Since Rodwell got a call!!!

 

Franz?

Definitely, fucking hate those twats

Anyway, where else was he supposed to want to place Scott's winnings?

It was Tongue and cheek about an award he'd won

 

Tiger's happy with it

 

Storm in a teacup

Even Sir Les?

He can be excused for the brief time he wore the white of bolton

Maybe black people should stop calling women 'hoes' and 'bitches',stop calling gays 'faggots'

 

and stop calling themselves 'ni**gers' when it suits them.If JT has said this then yes he's bang out of order but a mountain out of a molehill,maybe eh.

 

I know not all black people say the above but they dont do themselves any favours do they

Nowt like a good mass generalization eh.

they dont do themselves any favours do they

 

Embarrassing....

I'm wondering who "they" are, I'm guessing rappers from the 1980s?

There's plenty of white men out there call women hoes & bitches & gays, faggots. Actually, there's plenty of white men on here who........

 

Never mind.

look

 

i know he's vile

 

but i don't see that what he says is so bad

 

if he'd used the N word, or its ilk, but he said black, and ferdinand is black

 

I hear you, Cas - it's a tricky one - but in context Terry wasn't articulating the facts. Semantic interpretation at play here but he didn't call him a "black man", he called him a "black c*nt" and it's the combination of the two words that is offensive (to me at least), as the "black" element definitely leads/defines the insult - arguably the "cnut" is secondary in all this, and merely serves to accentuate. If he'd called (for example) Yossi Benayoun a "jewish c*nt" would we not agree that the "jewish" element was relevant and not exactly passive in the insult, despite being factually correct?

I hear you, Cas - it's a tricky one - but in context Terry wasn't articulating the facts. Semantic interpretation at play here but he didn't call him a "black man", he called him a "black c*nt" and it's the combination of the two words that is offensive (to me at least), as the "black" element definitely leads/defines the insult - arguably the "cnut" is secondary in all this, and merely serves to accentuate. If he'd called (for example) Yossi Benayoun a "jewish c*nt" would we not agree that the "jewish" element was relevant and not exactly passive in the insult, despite being factually correct?

 

Yes, but you killed Dr Black!

Sorry, couldn't resist that one. Last time I played Cluedo, it was Colonel Mustard with the lead piping in the library.

I hear you, Cas - it's a tricky one - but in context Terry wasn't articulating the facts. Semantic interpretation at play here but he didn't call him a "black man", he called him a "black c*nt" and it's the combination of the two words that is offensive (to me at least), as the "black" element definitely leads/defines the insult - arguably the "cnut" is secondary in all this, and merely serves to accentuate. If he'd called (for example) Yossi Benayoun a "jewish c*nt" would we not agree that the "jewish" element was relevant and not exactly passive in the insult, despite being factually correct?

 

Similarly if you called someone a Geordie cunt, a Manc cunt, a Cockney cunt etc etc. It can be deemed offensive but racialist ? I remain unconvinced.

Cant see what all the fcukin fuss is about;

 

Anton; is Black therefore a Black bastard

 

Terry; is White therefore a fcukin cnut of the highest order

 

Chungy; has slanty eyes therefore a slanty eyed dog eater

 

Hope this helps

 

Chungy; has slanty eyes therefore a slanty eyed dog eater

 

Hope this helps

Diddledee won't be happy with that.