Didn't Pluto used to be a planet?

Aye it got chucked off the VIP list.

 

Poor little cunt.

Closer still - but the spacecraft has gone into "fucked" mode apparently, so they're trying to  fettle it with just a few days left. Bit of a pisser if that's that after a 10 year flight!

All adds to the conspiracy theorist's assumption that all this space stuff is bollocks. Didn't the last mission to some other planet end with the landing bit failing behind a rock which shielded it from the sun and therefore its power source.

 

By the way I'm not one of the conspiracy theorists

http://news.sky.com/story/1514080/alien-life-on-philae-comet-scientists-say

 

Fascinating

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/11719914/Astronomers-discover-monster-black-holes.html

 

Super massive big fuck off black holes all over the shop.

 

All boring & pointless research obvs. but a bi product of the technology to find them is wifi.

Edited July 6, 201511 yr by no balls

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/11719914/Astronomers-discover-monster-black-holes.html

 

Super massive big fuck off black holes all over the shop.

 

All boring & pointless research obvs. but a bi product of the technology to find them is wifi.

What would happen if earth ended up in one of these buggers?

What would happen if earth ended up in one of these buggers?

We'd be instantly squashed to a tiny little piece of matter under the unimaginable force of gravity and time as we understand it would cease to exist. On the plus side - our clubs debt problems would be a thing of the past!

We'd be instantly squashed to a tiny little piece of matter under the unimaginable force of gravity and time as we understand it would cease to exist. On the plus side - our clubs debt problems would be a thing of the past!

Or we could use the Hollywood theorem where we'd all end up the other end in either the future or the past and have loads of adventures.

We'd be instantly squashed to a tiny little piece of matter under the unimaginable force of gravity and time as we understand it would cease to exist. On the plus side - our clubs debt problems would be a thing of the past!

Sounds lovely.

 

Where do I sign?

Sounds lovely.

 

Where do I sign?

Sign on the dotted event horizon line :-)

All adds to the conspiracy theorist's assumption that all this space stuff is bollocks. Didn't the last mission to some other planet end with the landing bit failing behind a rock which shielded it from the sun and therefore its power source.

 

By the way I'm not one of the conspiracy theorists

 

do folk still think that these days? thought it was just the moon landing

 

as always with such mentalists, they just have to ask themselves exactly how many people would need to be in  on it, to pull it off with no glitches/snitches

 

far too many

do folk still think that these days? thought it was just the moon landing

 

as always with such mentalists, they just have to ask themselves exactly how many people would need to be in  on it, to pull it off with no glitches/snitches

 

far too many

 

I like the moon landing nut-jobs, they make me laugh

 

If it hadn't happened, I'm sure the Russians might have mentioned it, especially as I'm sure they probably tracked what was going on very closely indeed at that time

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/11719914/Astronomers-discover-monster-black-holes.html

 

Super massive big fuck off black holes all over the shop.

 

All boring & pointless research obvs. but a bi product of the technology to find them is wifi.

 

as much as all this fascinates me, I don't mind admitting that sometimes I get lost in what's going on

 

for example

 

Supermassive black holes are powerful cosmic "drains" sucking material into a point of infinite density formed from the compressed mass of hundreds of thousands to billions of suns.

 

so, what the fuck does that mean, exactly?

 

if one was nearby would we fall into a hole and come out somewhere on the other side?  would we even know it had happened?  like just watching us driving towards it in the sky, with fuck all we can do?

 

the pictures in the article didn't tell me much

do folk still think that these days? thought it was just the moon landing

 

as always with such mentalists, they just have to ask themselves exactly how many people would need to be in on it, to pull it off with no glitches/snitches

 

far too many

Or apply Occam's razor.

 

What's more likely? Nasa noticed that there was alien life on Pluto whilst using a secret longer range camera which they had attached to new horizons without letting the press or public know and they are now busy concealing the fact whilst figuring out what to do about this new extra terrestrial threat whilst keeping the hundreds who witnessed it sworn to secrecy.

 

Or

 

The computer fucked up.

I like the moon landing nut-jobs, they make me laugh

 

If it hadn't happened, I'm sure the Russians might have mentioned it, especially as I'm sure they probably tracked what was going on very closely indeed at that time

 

unless the russians were in on it too of course, despite the cold war and everything

 

i did once watch a program, where they interviewed firstly the conspiracy theorist who presented pics and footage and in great detail explained why it was a fraud and put across what seemed very well thought out and valid points

 

in the interests of "balance" they then presented the ideas to a nasa expert, and on pretty much each occasion his counter arguement was simply "it's bollocks that" then went "see, they can't disprove it" - it was about as one sided and open to debate as a michael moore documentary

https://youtu.be/P6MOnehCOUw

Or apply Occam's razor.

 

What's more likely? Nasa noticed that there was alien life on Pluto whilst using a secret longer range camera which they had attached to new horizons without letting the press or public know and they are now busy concealing the fact whilst figuring out what to do about this new extra terrestrial threat whilst keeping the hundreds who witnessed it sworn to secrecy.

 

Or

 

The computer fucked up.

 

i more interested in how come that ship that landed on that comet has it's own twitter account...

 

https://twitter.com/Philae2014

 

this just doesn't' add up...

 

if i was spending time out on a comet on my own for the foreseeable future, i'd be following @redhothunnies, not Brian fucking May

Edited July 7, 201511 yr by ZicoKelly

i more interested in how come that ship that landed on that comet has it's own twitter account...

 

https://twitter.com/Philae2014

 

this just doesn't' add up...

 

if i was spending time out on a comet on my own for the foreseeable future, i'd be following @edhothunnies, not Brian fucking May

Also - how does it manage to get a signal when my WiFi doesn't even work when I'm in the back yard?

unless the russians were in on it too of course, despite the cold war and everything

 

i did once watch a program, where they interviewed firstly the conspiracy theorist who presented pics and footage and in great detail explained why it was a fraud and put across what seemed very well thought out and valid points

 

in the interests of "balance" they then presented the ideas to a nasa expert, and on pretty much each occasion his counter arguement was simply "it's bollocks that" then went "see, they can't disprove it" - it was about as one sided and open to debate as a michael moore documentary

 

Here are a few answers to the oft used reasons that the conspiracy lot use. There are others I've read and Brian Cox has debunked many including the one about those camera shadows/reflections.

 

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/debunking-myth-that-moon-landing-was-hoax-1457501

Edited July 7, 201511 yr by bgoefc

Wifi range is kept low on purpose so that neighbours, good neighbours can't share it, and become good friends...

http://news.sky.com/story/1514080/alien-life-on-philae-comet-scientists-say

 

Fascinating

Maybe don't get too excited just yet!

 

http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/07/magic-carbon-layer-not-a-sign-of-extraterrestrial-life/

Here are a few answers to the oft used reasons that the the conspiracy lot use. There are others I've read and Brian Cox has debunked many including the one about the the camera shadows/reflections.

 

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/debunking-myth-that-moon-landing-was-hoax-1457501

You've just ruined Danny G's life

 Apparently it's not fucked any more - probably turned it off and on again - and we're getting closer

I hope satan has got plenty of tissues at the ready at its tomorrow!

I hope satan has got plenty of tissues at the ready at its tomorrow!

11:50am UK time, though it will be out of contact so we will have to wait some time before the data is transmitted. Exciting times.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-33517532

 

This has necessitated aiming New Horizons at a "keyhole" in space just 100km by 150km (60miles by 90 miles), and arriving at that location within a set margin of 100 seconds.