is that it now game over no chance of POTUS

 

Rayguns out

However as you asked (sorry I have no video)

 

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2011/feb/08/charity-anger-mps-paul-maynard-disability

No vid. Fake news.

 

That's how it works now eh?

I take it you didn’t notice the false war in Iraq? The one where the presidents and PM caused 100s of thousands of lives?

 

Do you live in a cave?

 

Or is the death of all them innocent people not as bad as mocking someone?

And Trump would have been balls deep in that given half the chance

No vid. Fake news.

 

That's how it works now eh?

Yes I can live with that, however I’m still struggling to see how killing all them innocent people is not as bad as mocking someone, maybe you could give Salford a hand as he’s struggling at the moment and making lies up again

And Trump would have been balls deep in that given half the chance

Ok

Yes I can live with that, however I’m still struggling to see how killing all them innocent people is not as bad as mocking someone, maybe you could give Salford a hand as he’s struggling at the moment and making lies up again

It's not as bad as being responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. I don't think anybody is claiming it is are they? You'd have to be a moron to think that. But then I did go on the anti war marches in London. I haven't yet been on an anti Donald Trump mocking the disabled march because there's no moral equivalence.

 

It doesn't stop him being a cock though.

It's not as bad as being responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. I don't think anybody is claiming it is are they? You'd have to be a moron to think that. But then I did go on the anti war marches in London. I haven't yet been on an anti Donald Trump mocking the disabled march because there's no moral equivalence.

 

It doesn't stop him being a cock though.

 

“You said others had behaved worse than him.. Prove it” That was posted by Salford to whom I was replying about 20 minutes ago

 

Do you lot just dive in at any point of a topic and try and twist it to suit yourselves.

However as you asked (sorry I have no video)

 

https://amp.theguardian.com/politics/2011/feb/08/charity-anger-mps-paul-maynard-disability

You said seasoned politicians?? I take it from this you can't find any so case closed

Edited August 30, 20187 yr by Salford Trotter

Ok

You think otherwise?

You said seasoned politicians?? I take it from this you can't find any so case closed

Eh?

 

“Which british politicans have mocked the disabled? Show me the videos of where they said it so i can believe you?”

 

That is what you posted so that is what I replied to, keep digging Salford, I know you edited your last post but you didn’t edit he original!

You think otherwise?

Go on, tell me what inside intelligence you have to make you assume Trump would have been balls deep.

Go on, tell me what inside intelligence you have to make you assume Trump would have been balls deep.

I'm surmising.

 

His belligerence stance since being elected points to him being balls deep given half a chance

I'm surmising.

 

His belligerence stance since being elected points to him being balls deep given half a chance

Ok

 

“You said others had behaved worse than him.. Prove it” That was posted by Salford to whom I was replying about 20 minutes ago

 

Do you lot just dive in at any point of a topic and try and twist it to suit yourselves.

I'm pretty sure most of us would clobber somebody who acted like DT did if we saw it happening in real life. And I don't think anybody would blame you for it. I just don't understand why you feel the need to make excuses for him.

 

Anyhow - we aren't going to agree so it's pointless carrying on really. I'll leave you to mull over your own principles.

Eh?

 

“Which british politicans have mocked the disabled? Show me the videos of where they said it so i can believe you?”

 

That is what you posted so that is what I replied to, keep digging Salford, I know you edited your last post but you didn’t edit he original!

You said "seasoned politicans", those are your words not mine and you come up with a feeble attempt to prove your own point which proves you had no foundation for your claim, do i hear fake news? On a more important point that charity should be ashamed if themselves, in fact i would go as far to say heads should've have rolled for that if they didn't at the time.

 

The simple fact is there are no politicans of any note that mock the disabled other than trump. No doubt i will be labelled 'weird' or 'scumbag' now hahaha

I'm surmising.

 

His belligerence stance since being elected points to him being balls deep given half a chance

He will be asking for videos of Trump balls deep next, Putin has those though

I'm pretty sure most of us would clobber somebody who acted like DT did if we saw it happening in real life. And I don't think anybody would blame you for it. I just don't understand why you feel the need to make excuses for him.

 

Anyhow - we aren't going to agree so it's pointless carrying on really. I'll leave you to mull over your own principles.

Where do you sit on match day? I see a hell of a lot worse but I’ve never seen fans filing each other in over it (I’m guessing west upper)

 

I’ve not made excuses for him and constantly said he’s far from perfect however from me pressing “add reply” to you and 1 or 2 other receiving it parts of my comments must have been deleted!

 

I’ll say it again, he’s far from perfect, he’s made mistakes (not as big as some of the other seasoned politicians). Twist them words all you want to fit your own agenda however I’m pretty sure it’s quite accurate.

You said "seasoned politicans", those are your words not mine and you come up with a feeble attempt to prove your own point which proves you had no foundation for your claim, do i hear fake news? On a more important point that charity should be ashamed if themselves, in fact i would go as far to say heads should've have rolled for that if they didn't at the time.

 

The simple fact is there are no politicans of any note that mock the disabled other than trump. No doubt i will be labelled 'weird' or 'scumbag' now hahaha

Salford just go back to your post which you asked the question I replied to! If you want to ask me a different question then type it I know I’m good but I’m not psychic!

Where do you sit on match day? I see a hell of a lot worse but I’ve never seen fans filing each other in over it (I’m guessing west upper)

 

I’ve not made excuses for him and constantly said he’s far from perfect however from me pressing “add reply” to you and 1 or 2 other receiving it parts of my comments must have been deleted!

 

I’ll say it again, he’s far from perfect, he’s made mistakes (not as big as some of the other seasoned politicians). Twist them words all you want to fit your own agenda however I’m pretty sure it’s quite accurate.

All I wanted you to say is that Donald Trump was a cock for mocking someone with a disability. But you can't even bring yourself to do that.

 

And I've never seen someone mock a disabled person at the match. And if they did they'd deserve to get slapped in my opinion.

 

And I'm ESL.

Salford just go back to your post which you asked the question I replied to! If you want to ask me a different question then type it I know I’m good but I’m not psychic!

You can't prove the point you made so thats fine. Let's move on now

All I wanted you to say is that Donald Trump was a cock for mocking someone with a disability. But you can't even bring yourself to do that.

 

And I've never seen someone mock a disabled person at the match. And if they did they'd deserve to get slapped in my opinion.

 

And I'm ESL.

I’ve said he was wrong, what more do you want?

 

Have you praised him when he’s done good?

You can't prove the point you made so thats fine. Let's move on now

Eh? What points that?

 

Are you just on the wind up?

American politics is a dirty business.

In 2000 McCain was challenging Bush jnr for the Republican nomination for President.

Bush had the big money backing but was shaken by McCain's win in the New Hampshire primary.

They realised they could face a problem on military records (McCain, son of an Admiral and grandson of another, shot down over Vietnam - could not escape as he had 2 broken legs and a broken arm - gave up the opportunity of earlier release so as not to embarrass his father, whereas Bush escaped the draft by his father placing him ahead of 100,000 applicants for a Texas national guard post - saving Texas from attack by Oklahoma).

There were photos of McCain with his adopted daughter, an orphan from Bangladesh, so the Bush team claimed he had fathered a child by a black woman - it went down well in the Southern states.

Trump has basically bought his way into the job.

 

He appealed to a very basic set of emotions amongst an electorate that was willing to suckle at the teets if anyone who spoke their language.

 

For that, he can be credited with achieving something big.

 

It does not change the undeniable facts that he is a total foreskin.

 

They got what they deserved though.

I’ve said he was wrong, what more do you want?

 

Have you praised him when he’s done good?

If you have - then that's the first time I've noticed you say it.

 

I'm struggling to think of many things he's done in office that I'd describe as 'good'. Although I'm sure there must be something.

 

The only recent thing I can think of is appointing Kelvin Droegemeier as a science advisor - as a balance to the climate change skeptics he's been surrounding himself with.

 

You could argue he acted resolutely to the chemical weapons use in Syria - so I'd praise him for that. Although at the time I thought he was taking an almighty risk.

Eh? What points that?

 

Are you just on the wind up?

Let me remind you what you said when you defended Trump's mocking of a disabled person

 

 Is he any bigger of a cock than the seasoned politicians was what I originally said and for me he isn’t, far from it.

 

So I when I challenged you to show me another "seasoned politician" who has mocked a disabled person and you come up with an article about a charity and not a seasoned politician that made some disparaging and completely unacceptable remarks.

 

So you can't back up your point with any evidence because respectable and decent human beings, never mind the leader of the free world, would make such remarks. Kent gave a perfect and humbling example and despite this you still refuse to condemn him in the strongest terms. As others have said you need to reflect on your morals.