Is it kicking off big time or is this just everyday stuff they deal with or a bit of both?

 

3 hours ago, London Wanderer said:

Sorry have I misunderstood the comment pal ?

What did you mean by this - There’s growing concerns around Islam in the west yet still it grows. No reason why that can’t be the case with Israeli Jews ?

I took that as people aren't happy for Israeli Jews to grow? 

 

You need to go back a page and read peelyfeets post 

7 hours ago, kent_white said:

Interesting day today with the possible cease fire. 

Listening to Radio 4 (obviously accepting that they are Communist agitators) and the consensus amongst military analysts seems to be that Hamas is finished as a fighting force. 95% are dead. Gaza is currently being run by dispirate sets of gangs and militias funded by all sorts of local and international actors (including Israel). 

That's been partly the case for quite some time.

Remember reading an article about it soon after it all kicked off 

Families and gangs- like you'd see all over.

Firstly, it would be impossible to differentiate between them as a soldier on the ground, therefore using targeted strikes on known terrorist infrastructure makes more sense.

Secondly, whether they are Hamas members or not, if they share similar ideology towards Israel, then they're going to be treated similarly.

55 minutes ago, royal white said:

You need to go back a page and read peelyfeets post 

I did

 Still curious what point you’re making. Who’s said Israeli Jews shouldn’t be able to still grow as a population? Did Peely say they shouldn’t? 

Edited July 7, 2025Jul 7 by London Wanderer

9 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

I did

 Still curious what point you’re making. Who’s said Israeli Jews shouldn’t be able to still grow as a population? Did Peely say they shouldn’t? 

Absolutely no one 

9 hours ago, boltonboris said:

You needn't worry. If they're going to be in such a good way, you won't have to worry about them moving into whichever country you're not currently residing in 😉

On the move me pal. Worrying doesn't even register.

Prying authorities aren't pinning me down easily. 

Switching continents again very shortly.

2 hours ago, royal white said:

Absolutely no one 

Peely was commenting that muslims will outbreed Jews over the next few years. He must have done the Bleeding Obvious course.

That implies that Peely believes that the Jewish population will grow - just by far smaller numbers than those who would see them obliterated.

Our good friend is hallucinating again. It will be the psylocibin.

22 hours ago, bolty58 said:

It will be the psylocibin.

That's how @little whitt spells bicycle

22 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Peely was commenting that muslims will outbreed Jews over the next few years. He must have done the Bleeding Obvious course.

That implies that Peely believes that the Jewish population will grow - just by far smaller numbers than those who would see them obliterated.

Our good friend is hallucinating again. It will be the psylocibin.

You’re like a broken record 😁

Basically some folk on here don't Muslims. Its that prosaic.

Everything else is bluff and bluster

 

5 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

Basically some folk on here don't Muslims. Its that prosaic.

Everything else is bluff and bluster

 

Like? Mind? Eat? Shag? Burn? 

1 hour ago, royal white said:

Like? Mind? Eat? Shag? Burn? 

Just casually blowing to bits more children while they were queuing. Evil cunts.

Something, something Bob Vylan. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gd01g1gxro

Edited July 10, 2025Jul 10 by deeane Koontz

21 minutes ago, deeane Koontz said:

Just casually blowing to bits more children while they were queuing. Evil cunts.

Something, something Bob Vylan. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gd01g1gxro

The Israeli military said it targeted a "Hamas terrorist" in the area. It said it "regret[ted] any harm to uninvolved individuals" and that the incident was "under review".

Jesus - how many fucking reviews do they currently have open. This must be at least #3681

Let's hope they managed to get at that one Hamas terrorist though eh? 

Absolute abominable cunts. 

@royal white is probably best able to answer this one. Who would actually be responsible for this in all likelyhood? Would it be the guy with his finger on the trigger/button? Or would the order have come from higher up the chain of command? 

I wouldn't last two minutes in the military. Not a cat in hell's chance I'd have carried out that order even if it meant I was getting court martialed for it. 

4 minutes ago, kent_white said:

The Israeli military said it targeted a "Hamas terrorist" in the area. It said it "regret[ted] any harm to uninvolved individuals" and that the incident was "under review".

same as the last one, and the one before that, and before that

same as the next one, and the next one after that, and after that

So we’re meant to believe there is no way they could have waited until those women & children had left, & the collateral damage would have been smaller.
 

Anyone who can’t see there are alternative motives at play really does have their head in the sand. 

 

16 minutes ago, kent_white said:

 

@royal white is probably best able to answer this one.

Are you sure pal 😁

All we’ve had over countless pages is “Whatabout the baddies”; “Whatabout other conflicts” & “These things happen in war”.

I hope I’m wrong & you get a proper answer for a change 😉

1 hour ago, kent_white said:

The Israeli military said it targeted a "Hamas terrorist" in the area. It said it "regret[ted] any harm to uninvolved individuals" and that the incident was "under review".

Jesus - how many fucking reviews do they currently have open. This must be at least #3681

Let's hope they managed to get at that one Hamas terrorist though eh? 

Absolute abominable cunts. 

@royal white is probably best able to answer this one. Who would actually be responsible for this in all likelyhood? Would it be the guy with his finger on the trigger/button? Or would the order have come from higher up the chain of command? 

I wouldn't last two minutes in the military. Not a cat in hell's chance I'd have carried out that order even if it meant I was getting court martialed for it. 

Probably the middle man. Depending on the size of the Operation depends on where the order comes from. This is guess work but if this was a company level operation then it’s the OC who’s probably formulated the plan to his “trusty” young lieutenants and captains. They then pass that down to the lads. Shit rolls downhill then up a little bit! However it’s so hard to say from that repost. There could be dozens of different factors. 
 

Always blame the young officer. 😉

13 minutes ago, royal white said:

Probably the middle man. Depending on the size of the Operation depends on where the order comes from. This is guess work but if this was a company level operation then it’s the OC who’s probably formulated the plan to his “trusty” young lieutenants and captains. They then pass that down to the lads. Shit rolls downhill then up a little bit! However it’s so hard to say from that repost. There could be dozens of different factors. 
 

Always blame the young officer. 😉

Thanks mate. So would that middle man have complete autonomy? Or would they be bound by rules of engaged from above? ie - if there's suspected Hamas there then you should open fire even if that means civilian casualties? 

I've got genuinely no idea about this kind of thing. 

Realise it might be an impossible question to answer. 

And would you have any right as the person pulling the trigger to refuse? I'm sure ai read somewhere once that in the British Army there's more responsibility placed on the individual - but I might have made that up! 😁

I would imagine an order could be refused if the individual felt that the law(s) were being broken by following it.

I don't know.

I would imagine there is only a narrow range of situations that this may be possible. 

In general, you follow the order, or you're bounced out.

In a war situation, of course professional soldiers like ours will try to mitigate such casualties, but sooner or later, depending upon the level of threat, engagement with an enemy would have to take place.

Royal will no doubt have experience, or former colleagues with experience of such events.

7 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

 

In a war situation, of course professional soldiers like ours will try to mitigate such casualties, but sooner or later, depending upon the level of threat, engagement with an enemy would have to take place.

I think that's the key bit.

Think most of our lads would be shocked if they spent a week with the IDF in Gaza.

33 minutes ago, wakey said:

I think that's the key bit.

Think most of our lads would be shocked if they spent a week with the IDF in Gaza.

That's what I like to tell myself.......

1 hour ago, kent_white said:

Thanks mate. So would that middle man have complete autonomy? Or would they be bound by rules of engaged from above? ie - if there's suspected Hamas there then you should open fire even if that means civilian casualties? 

I've got genuinely no idea about this kind of thing. 

Realise it might be an impossible question to answer. 

And would you have any right as the person pulling the trigger to refuse? I'm sure ai read somewhere once that in the British Army there's more responsibility placed on the individual - but I might have made that up! 😁

Impossible  to answer, a lot will always be ones word against another’s. If they (IDF) said they feared there was an immediate threat against from this Hamas terrorist then (depending on certain circumstances) they would be within their rights. But there’s so many different factors. We used to walk past buildings every day in Northern Ireland with known IRA Members in but it was never a reason to just open up on them. 
 

As for refusing, you could but it wouldn’t end well. 😂 (it it was a legitimate target) 

12 minutes ago, royal white said:

Impossible  to answer, a lot will always be ones word against another’s. If they (IDF) said they feared there was an immediate threat against from this Hamas terrorist then (depending on certain circumstances) they would be within their rights. But there’s so many different factors. We used to walk past buildings every day in Northern Ireland with known IRA Members in but it was never a reason to just open up on them. 
 

As for refusing, you could but it wouldn’t end well. 😂 (it it was a legitimate target) 

Starmer doesn't like this

 

2 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Starmer doesn't like this

 

Decent folk agree with him

1 hour ago, Casino said:

Decent folk agree with him

Anyone who thinks it's OK to constantly chase former soldiers for supposed "war crimes" isn't decent.

In fact they're cunts of the highest calibre.