6 coppers to take him down or 1 member of the public with his bike? 
 

 

 

Just now, Sluffy said:

I asked for your snipey replies to be humorous.

Don't you know how to do those?

I know how to do this. You can annoy the other poor fuckers you boring git.

5 hours ago, Sluffy said:

Your point scoring, trolling, neediness, never ending arguments, wanting to control the narrative, answering questions with questions or whatever it is you are doing (knowingly or not) I'm just not not interested in being a foil for you or your ego.

I've no doubt whatsoever that you will go all out for me to respond, to get your little victory, thrill, rush, whatever it is that spurs you on, but all you're going to get back from me is a repeat of this post then I'll just blank you thereafter.

Enjoy the rest of your day.

Liar 😆😆😆😆

Do elaborate or we can just put it down to more shit that you continually waffle.

4 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

I know how to do this. You can annoy the other poor fuckers you boring git.

That's better!

You're so much funnier when you are angry!

1 hour ago, Sluffy said:

I asked for your snipey replies to be humorous.

Don't you know how to do those?

To be fair you're hardly a laugh a minute yourself.

1 hour ago, bolty58 said:

Look, try using your own brain instead of the apparently defective electronic one you seem to be reliant upon.

Let me spell it out for you.

1. Leave the ECHR.

2. Do as Australia did and tow the boats back to the shore they departed from.

3. In a very short time, the folk who are often investing their life savings with criminals will realise they are pissing away the family store for nought and will cease seeking to cross the channel.

4. They will then stop making their way to Northern France and probably stay in the first 'safe' country they reach from whatever God forsaken hell hole they have left (if they are truly escaping wars/oppression etc. - which in many cases I believe to be absolute bollocks and are merely economic migrants). This would undoubtedly be an agreeable result for France too.

5. The big bonus. An end to these 'boat people' perishing in the Channel. The antithesis of what you were stupidly implying that any one us would like to see.

This is the longest reply you will ever receive from me. It may well be one of the last.

Leaving the ECHR won't change much I don't believe if you bothered to read and understand what I was conjecturing in one of my earlier post today, on this thread.

We don't do gunboat diplomacy anymore and even if we wanted to restart doing so, we no longer have the boats to do it with.

I don't think many have family stores to piss away to get to here, From the little that I understand most of the 'illegals' are basically indentured slaves once they get here and remain so until they they've worked off all the debt they now find themselves in.

Well they may well be economic migrants but they still are fleeing from war and famine 'back home' and trying to find a better life for themselves and family elsewhere - wouldn't you in their place, I know I would.

Good to see your heart isn't entirely made of stone, no one wants to murder innocent people (well I guess that's too idealistic from me to claim these days with the Putin's, Netanyahu's and Hamases in the world now) but good on you that even you would not want the rubber boaters to be slaughtered trying to get to our green and pleasant land.

I commend your efforts to want to engage in lucid and articulated views from yourself, much better don't you think than continual childish sniping that you specialise in.

It's more fun when we play nice together don't you think?

I do.

12 minutes ago, RONNIE PHILLIPS said:

To be fair you're hardly a laugh a minute yourself.

I'm more of an acquired taste...

AI Overview

acquired taste

An "acquired taste" is something you initially dislike but grow to enjoy after repeated exposure, experience, or effort.

10 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Look, try using your own brain instead of the apparently defective electronic one you seem to be reliant upon.

Let me spell it out for you.

1. Leave the ECHR.

2. Do as Australia did and tow the boats back to the shore they departed from.

3. In a very short time, the folk who are often investing their life savings with criminals will realise they are pissing away the family store for nought and will cease seeking to cross the channel.

4. They will then stop making their way to Northern France and probably stay in the first 'safe' country they reach from whatever God forsaken hell hole they have left (if they are truly escaping wars/oppression etc. - which in many cases I believe to be absolute bollocks and are merely economic migrants). This would undoubtedly be an agreeable result for France too.

5. The big bonus. An end to these 'boat people' perishing in the Channel. The antithesis of what you were stupidly implying that any one us would like to see.

This is the longest reply you will ever receive from me. It may well be one of the last.

It does sound simple....but the first point, about leaving the ECHR won't happen, even if Reform get in at the next GE, they'll find a reason why they cannot simply just leave the ECHR - it will of course be everybody else's fault.

As for point 2, it's been discussed to death by those who know more than you or I, that the Channel crossing being so short, is a problem in tracking the boats - by the time they do spot them, they're often already here. If the expanse of water was larger and wasn't' as busy as it currently is, then it'd be much easier to spot and intercept (apparently)

The only real way to stop them coming, is to make it wholly unattractive to anybody who does make the crossing - at the minute, there is clearly far too much incentive to make the crossing, we need to remove that incentive.

5 minutes ago, Sweep said:

It does sound simple....but the first point, about leaving the ECHR won't happen, even if Reform get in at the next GE, they'll find a reason why they cannot simply just leave the ECHR - it will of course be everybody else's fault.

As for point 2, it's been discussed to death by those who know more than you or I, that the Channel crossing being so short, is a problem in tracking the boats - by the time they do spot them, they're often already here. If the expanse of water was larger and wasn't' as busy as it currently is, then it'd be much easier to spot and intercept (apparently)

The only real way to stop them coming, is to make it wholly unattractive to anybody who does make the crossing - at the minute, there is clearly far too much incentive to make the crossing, we need to remove that incentive.

This this this with cherries on top. Why are so many officials not putting this into practice? It’s the only way.

46 minutes ago, Sweep said:

It does sound simple....but the first point, about leaving the ECHR won't happen, even if Reform get in at the next GE, they'll find a reason why they cannot simply just leave the ECHR - it will of course be everybody else's fault.

They said that about us leaving the EU. Wouldn't be surprised if there's another referendum on the horizon...

Edited 20 hours ago20 hr by Cheese

17 minutes ago, Cheese said:

They said that about us leaving the EU. Wouldn't be surprised if there's another referendum on the horizon...

I hope not, the general public have proved enough they're too fucking thick/gormless to be allowed a say on something so important

Spot the difference.

I said...

20 hours ago, Sluffy said:

I have no answers and that's why I don't want to be dragged into this, especially with those like you who seem to get your kicks by continual point scoring all the time.

My thoughts for what they are worth is to identify what draws the illegals to seek asylum in the UK rather than all the 'safe' countries they've already travelled through such as France, Spain, Italy etc, and reduce whatever is the inducement for them to continue on to our shores, to the level of the countries they've forgo, in order to make travelling on any more beneficial for them.

Although I highlight my first paragraph, note the second.

My self appointed nemesis replies...

18 hours ago, royal white said:

My point scoring? Do elaborate as I’ve said in the past there’s no party capable of stopping the boats. So what are you referring to?

I reply...

17 hours ago, Sluffy said:

Your point scoring, trolling, neediness, never ending arguments, wanting to control the narrative, answering questions with questions or whatever it is you are doing (knowingly or not) I'm just not not interested in being a foil for you or your ego.

I've no doubt whatsoever that you will go all out for me to respond, to get your little victory, thrill, rush, whatever it is that spurs you on, but all you're going to get back from me is a repeat of this post then I'll just blank you thereafter.

As expected...

12 hours ago, royal white said:

Liar 😆😆😆😆

Do elaborate or we can just put it down to more shit that you continually waffle.

I blanked him of course.

Now today, and think back to what I said in my 'second' paragraph above, Sweep posted something more or less identical to what I had...

1 hour ago, Sweep said:

The only real way to stop them coming, is to make it wholly unattractive to anybody who does make the crossing - at the minute, there is clearly far too much incentive to make the crossing, we need to remove that incentive.

To which my best buddy gushes too...

1 hour ago, royal white said:

This this this with cherries on top. Why are so many officials not putting this into practice? It’s the only way.

Same thought posted by two different posters.

I posted it first a day earlier get's trolled by RA (a recurring theme with him) and with no mention of my thoughts to identify and remove to incentives for the asylum seekers to come here

Sweep writes more or less the same and get's a totally different response...

"This, this, this... "

Sounds almost that he's nearly at the point of coming...

Eugh.

Anyway all this simply to set up my next post below.

Don't be dragging me into you're little man-crush crisis with RW

18 hours ago, Sluffy said:

Your point scoring, trolling, neediness, never ending arguments, wanting to control the narrative, answering questions with questions or whatever it is you are doing (knowingly or not) I'm just not not interested in being a foil for you or your ego.

I've no doubt whatsoever that you will go all out for me to respond, to get your little victory, thrill, rush, whatever it is that spurs you on, but all you're going to get back from me is a repeat of this post then I'll just blank you thereafter.

12 hours ago, royal white said:

Liar 😆😆😆😆

Do elaborate or we can just put it down to more shit that you continually waffle.

Is my postabove enough elaboration for you?

Have a great day.

8 minutes ago, Sluffy said:

Spot the difference.

I said...

Although I highlight my first paragraph, note the second.

My self appointed nemesis replies...

I reply...

As expected...

I blanked him of course.

Now today, and think back to what I said in my 'second' paragraph above, Sweep posted something more or less identical to what I had...

To which my best buddy gushes too...

Same thought posted by two different posters.

I posted it first a day earlier get's trolled by RA (a recurring theme with him) and with no mention of my thoughts to identify and remove to incentives for the asylum seekers to come here

Sweep writes more or less the same and get's a totally different response...

"This, this, this... "

Sounds almost that he's nearly at the point of coming...

Eugh.

Anyway all this simply to set up my next post below.

I was replying to your first paragraph.

You said you wouldn’t reply…you did,

You’re an odd Individual.

6 minutes ago, Sweep said:

Don't be dragging me into you're little man-crush crisis with RW

He's the one stalking me.

He doesn't seem to understand that no, means no.

He still doing it too....

6 hours ago, Sluffy said:

I'm more of an acquired taste...

AI Overview

acquired taste

An "acquired taste" is something you initially dislike but grow to enjoy after repeated exposure, experience, or effort.

From past and previous experience I very much doubt it

16 hours ago, Sluffy said:

I'm more of an acquired taste...

AI Overview

acquired taste

An "acquired taste" is something you initially dislike but grow to enjoy after repeated exposure, experience, or effort.

Without wishing to appear rude......you're not, really you're not

1 hour ago, RONNIE PHILLIPS said:

From past and previous experience I very much doubt it

Without wishing to appear rude......you're not, really you're not

One man's meat is another man's poison, my friend.

Question, will you be quoting me two times in your next reply as well...?

He who laughs last, laughs loudest, don't you know!

Enjoy the rest of your day.

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/26194650.bolton-man-goes-trial-accused-rape-two-schoolgirls/

Bolton man? FFS he’s Afghan.

45 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/26194650.bolton-man-goes-trial-accused-rape-two-schoolgirls/

Bolton man? FFS he’s Afghan.

I think it just refers to the place where he lives!

Just a pity he won't end up back where he came from.

10 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

I think it just refers to the place where he lives!

Just a pity he won't end up back where he came from.

Did you not read the link because it states the bloke is an Afghan national (ie a citizen of Afghanistan).

It also says he lives at Georgina Court which seems to be off St Helens Road.

Edited 10 hours ago10 hr by Sluffy

36 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

I think it just refers to the place where he lives!

Just a pity he won't end up back where he came from.

Yeah but have you personally ever been affected by an Afghanistan national?

You are being brainwashed by the Bolton News whipping up racial tensions for their own gains.

Teacher guilty of abusing and murdering adopted baby boy - BBC News https://share.google/FkuzoGQMUvHBugr2f

Hang the bastards. The details of this case is up there with the worst stuff I've ever read.

Baby P tackle, if not worse.

Edited 9 hours ago9 hr by gonzo

The story of that baby boy being murdered by his foster parents in Blackpool is horrific

I can't imagine the pain and confusion he must've felt

Evil people

How adoptive parents' lies unravelled to reveal 'reign of terror' - BBC News https://share.google/ZZn9q19hQ9FMnOxbn

7 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Yeah but have you personally ever been affected by an Afghanistan national?

You are being brainwashed by the Bolton News whipping up racial tensions for their own gains.

I don't think they are,

The article is basically a court report (I assume you haven't read it), where two teens 13/14 years of age at the time, contacted the bloke (must have known him (or something about him) previously, travelled on the train from Manchester and met up with the 27 year old Afghan National (asylum seeker perhaps, it isn't stated) who took them back to his place, plied them with drink, refused to let them go, then raped them.