7 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Yeah but have you personally ever been affected by an Afghanistan national?

You are being brainwashed by the Bolton News whipping up racial tensions for their own gains.

I don't think they are,

The article is basically a court report (I assume you haven't read it), where two teens 13/14 years of age at the time, contacted the bloke (must have known him (or something about him) previously, travelled on the train from Manchester and met up with the 27 year old Afghan National (asylum seeker perhaps, it isn't stated) who took them back to his place, plied them with drink, refused to let them go, then raped them.

17 minutes ago, Sluffy said:

I don't think they are,

The article is basically a court report (I assume you haven't read it), where two teens 13/14 years of age at the time, contacted the bloke (must have known him (or something about him) previously, travelled on the train from Manchester and met up with the 27 year old Afghan National (asylum seeker perhaps, it isn't stated) who took them back to his place, plied them with drink, refused to let them go, then raped them.

🤦🏻🤦🏻 I’ll let you tell him @gonzo

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

🤦🏻🤦🏻 I’ll let you tell him @gonzo

Oh, I assume from your cryptic post that @gonzo was having a little dig at TMGJ and wasn't talking specifically about the Bolton News aricle?

Fwiw the trial is still ongoing if anyone actually cares about it?

Thanks for the heads up.

Apreciated.

5 hours ago, Sluffy said:

One man's meat is another man's poison, my friend.

Question, will you be quoting me two times in your next reply as well...?

He who laughs last, laughs loudest, don't you know!

Enjoy the rest of your day.

I admit it was a pitiful attempt to make my posts as long and as mind numbing as your own.

51 minutes ago, RONNIE PHILLIPS said:

I admit it was a pitiful attempt to make my posts as long and as mind numbing as your own.

I disagree I thought you excelled in making yourself look numb.

Look mate I'm not here to fall out with anyone

I tried to help your mate (I note no one else bothered) and simply had an innocuous little joke with him - you know like silly billy, or numb skull or daft bugger - I meant no harm at all.

I got called a cunt for my trouble and have had you on my back since.

I can take a joke, some people can't.

We are on a social media forum when all said and done, it's not the real world although I guess to some people it is.

If you don't get my humour fine, if my posts are to long for your attention span, or not interesting enough for you to read - then don't read them.

We can't all be interested in the same stuff, so just skip over it if it isn't for you.

And I don't think you are numb anymore than I think your mate is one of the slow kids (and fwiw I never actually called him that although my post could be read as inferring he might be).

Isn't it about time we drew a line under this and move on?

10 hours ago, Sluffy said:

Oh, I assume from your cryptic post that @gonzo was having a little dig at TMGJ and wasn't talking specifically about the Bolton News aricle?

Fwiw the trial is still ongoing if anyone actually cares about it?

Thanks for the heads up.

Apreciated.

No I having a dig my old mucker @Cheese and his cronies that like to downplay issues such as these and pretend we don't have societal issues like currently sex attacks by Afghan males.

You know like back in the day when there was no problems with Pakistani Muslims grooming young girls. That all wasn't a problem either.

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

No I having a dig my old mucker @Cheese and his cronies that like to downplay issues such as these and pretend we don't have societal issues like currently sex attacks by Afghan males.

You know like back in the day when there was no problems with Pakistani Muslims grooming young girls. That all wasn't a problem either.

Never down played any of it. You've twisted my words.

On 15/06/2026 at 16:02, Sweep said:

It does sound simple....but the first point, about leaving the ECHR won't happen, even if Reform get in at the next GE, they'll find a reason why they cannot simply just leave the ECHR - it will of course be everybody else's fault.

As for point 2, it's been discussed to death by those who know more than you or I, that the Channel crossing being so short, is a problem in tracking the boats - by the time they do spot them, they're often already here. If the expanse of water was larger and wasn't' as busy as it currently is, then it'd be much easier to spot and intercept (apparently)

The only real way to stop them coming, is to make it wholly unattractive to anybody who does make the crossing - at the minute, there is clearly far too much incentive to make the crossing, we need to remove that incentive.

You are no fucking Confucius. This has already been established.

23 hours ago, Sweep said:

I hope not, the general public have proved enough they're too fucking thick/gormless to be allowed a say on something so important

Firthicko is one of them. Political suicide to even suggest another EU referendum. They just daren't. If this useless U turner in No. 10 daren't then no one does dare.

22 hours ago, royal white said:

You’re an odd Individual.

You should be a detective.

Just now, bolty58 said:

Firthicko is one of them. Political suicide to even suggest another EU referendum. They just daren't. If this useless U turner in No. 10 daren't then no one does dare.

I was talking about a referendum on withdrawing from the ECHR you fucking plank.

12 hours ago, gonzo said:

Teacher guilty of abusing and murdering adopted baby boy - BBC News https://share.google/FkuzoGQMUvHBugr2f

Hang the bastards. The details of this case is up there with the worst stuff I've ever read.

Baby P tackle, if not worse.

Fucking sickening. These two cunts should be hung or fatally injected or just torn to pieces by a baying mob.

It will no doubt attract howls of protest from the wet wipe wokes on here but the only homosexual couples to be allowed to adopt should be female couples and, furthermore, the field of child care should only ever be allowed to hire female employees.

I look forward to the expected derision from the usual suspects.

I don't think Male couples should be adopting babies as I think babies need that maternal motherly instinct only biological females can provide. That caring motherly nature cannot be replaced or replicated by a male imo.

I don't think them being gay had anything to do with this case mind. Being full blown murderous pedophiles was more to do with it.

1 hour ago, bolty58 said:

the field of child care should only ever be allowed to hire female employees.

Where do you stop with this though?

Teachers, Doctors, Youth Club workers, Baby sitting etc, they all spend time with children and offer varying degrees of "care" - they can't all be women

1 hour ago, Sweep said:

Where do you stop with this though?

Teachers, Doctors, Youth Club workers, Baby sitting etc, they all spend time with children and offer varying degrees of "care" - they can't all be women

Google Vanessa George

2 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Fucking sickening. These two cunts should be hung or fatally injected or just torn to pieces by a baying mob.

It will no doubt attract howls of protest from the wet wipe wokes on here but the only homosexual couples to be allowed to adopt should be female couples and, furthermore, the field of child care should only ever be allowed to hire female employees.

I look forward to the expected derision from the usual suspects.

don't get me wrong, my youngest has had males look after her at nursery, which didn't feel right at first but they've been great

I don't think it's fair to say bummers shouldn't get to adopt though, as though they are more likely to abuse kids

this happened literally round the corner from me back home

Nursery worker jailed for the manslaughter of 9-month-old baby Genevieve | Greater Manchester Police https://share.google/VTOQUq7cC3SjBGVpd

I think she was straight

at least before she went to prison

3 minutes ago, Sweep said:

Where do you stop with this though?

Teachers, Doctors, Youth Club workers, Baby sitting etc, they all spend time with children and offer varying degrees of "care" - they can't all be women

Anything from primary school is OK for me.

No way a bloke should be working a pre-school nursery.

Just some areas in life a bloke shouldn't be.

10 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Anything from primary school is OK for me.

No way a bloke should be working a pre-school nursery.

Just some areas in life a bloke shouldn't be.

Aye, doesn't seem quite right does it.

DEI rules etc would need to be changed to allow for such an approach, and that might lead to more protests!

I see nothing wrong with anyone taking on a job they want or are capable of doing. If there is any evidence that a group can not do the job adequately or are a danger to the kids then that changes. Why should nt a bloke work with pre school kids ? Never seen anything that says they are more likely to do anything wrong.

Also nothing wrong with same sex adoptions. Loads of research to show kids are treated just as well and the kids end up as good as other kids that are adopted.

Not like WW to have a knee jerk reaction to things with literally zero evidence! 😁

Was reading about that poor baby and his 'mother' yesterday. Fucking hell had to double check what i was reading.

Lost for words how a child could be let down to such an extent

53 minutes ago, Ani said:

I see nothing wrong with anyone taking on a job they want or are capable of doing. If there is any evidence that a group can not do the job adequately or are a danger to the kids then that changes. Why should nt a bloke work with pre school kids ? Never seen anything that says they are more likely to do anything wrong.

Also nothing wrong with same sex adoptions. Loads of research to show kids are treated just as well and the kids end up as good as other kids that are adopted.

I'm not saying it's about them doing anything wrong.

I'm saying women naturally offer a layer of care with babies/infants that men cannot.

That's why men shouldn't be allowed to adopt infants or babies. Not because they are more of a threat, just that for me kids at that age need a mother or motherly figures.

Blokes bond better with their own kids once they reach the toddler stage as it is.

Why a bloke would want to change nappies in a nursery is beyond me as well. That shit comes from maternal instinct.

9 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I'm not saying it's about them doing anything wrong.

I'm saying women naturally offer a layer of care with babies/infants that men cannot.

That's why men shouldn't be allowed to adopt infants or babies. Not because they are more of a threat, just that for me kids at that age need a mother or motherly figures.

Blokes bond better with their own kids once they reach the toddler stage as it is.

Why a bloke would want to change nappies in a nursery is beyond me as well. That shit comes from maternal instinct.

But all research shows a kid bought up by couples irrespective of it being one of each or two the same turn out the same.

4 hours ago, gonzo said:

I don't think Male couples should be adopting babies as I think babies need that maternal motherly instinct only biological females can provide. That caring motherly nature cannot be replaced or replicated by a male imo.

I don't think them being gay had anything to do with this case mind. Being full blown murderous pedophiles was more to do with it.

I'll let my friends know who have brought up well adjusted lovely kids.

Still can't believe views like this perpetuate.