Whizz Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 Yes a full time job plus a pro gig. He wouldn’t of been able to do any other work while at Lancs other than a bit of coaching at clubs as a guest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Horwich Posted April 27, 2019 Moderators Share Posted April 27, 2019 10 hours ago, Whizz said: Brown will be on a decent wedge at Accy. He will score shit loads aswel. And earning good money at CHHS. probably on a par with lancs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted April 29, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted April 29, 2019 An under 15s Lancs trial tomorrow an Bradshaw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cricketingwhite Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Can’t say I’m excited at the prospect of a double header in the PS. Could do with a re-think this comp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted May 3, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 3, 2019 Same with NKO and LKO. Bradshaw have been drawn at home throughout but, whilst it probably makes a few quid on the bar, it also piles pressure on ground staff to keep preparing wickets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Horwich Posted May 5, 2019 Moderators Share Posted May 5, 2019 Little Hultons pro batted really well yesterday against us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted May 5, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 5, 2019 Bradshaw played Daisy Hill and Darcy Lever this weekend in Peter Stafford. Do teams put weakened teams out at this level or were both teams really that poor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whizz Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 21 hours ago, Horwich said: Little Hultons pro batted really well yesterday against us. Did every LH player stay for a beer after the game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Horwich Posted May 6, 2019 Moderators Share Posted May 6, 2019 No, neither did Lythams the week before 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted May 6, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 6, 2019 Or Darcy Lever's seconds yesterday at the Rigbys. They also didn't eat the ham butties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whizz Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 Surely Lytham weren’t 11-0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Horwich Posted May 6, 2019 Moderators Share Posted May 6, 2019 Nopes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 Bradshaw 2s bowled over 50 wides on Saturday. Crikey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted May 13, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 13, 2019 Standard of umpiring is very poor at the moment. A few seem to give LBW on loudness of appeal rather than where ball pitched and player position. Others seem to give one LBW every third appeal. Another thing; if all eleven players go up to appeal an LBW, it's nothing but cheating. How can a player stood on the boundary at square leg appeal an LBW other than he heard the ball hit the pad. Umpires should be warning teams for over-appealing. The Laws state that no player can be given out without the fielding side appealing. This shouldn't mean appeal everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter MickyD Posted May 13, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted May 13, 2019 9 minutes ago, DazBob said: Bradshaw 2s bowled over 50 wides on Saturday. Crikey. 71 extras in total. Most of the wides went for 4. Problem is, Bradshaw 2s is very much an introduction to senior cricket at Bradshaw. They very much believe that the older juniors ought to be given a chance. As an aside, they also fell foul of a double-jeopardy when, due to the number of extended overs because of the bowling, they were docked overs from their innings. So they lose points for the bowling then lose the chance to recoup the points when batting. For the record, I reckon that a normal number of extras; say around 20, and it really would have been game on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DazBob Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 Do Bradshaw not have a third team? No leg side wide rule at that level so helps the younger lads who are bowling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 1 hour ago, DazBob said: Do Bradshaw not have a third team? No leg side wide rule at that level so helps the younger lads who are bowling. Yeah 3rds is 9 juniors and 2 seniors. Problem with 2s is exams at moment , 3 seniors and then u17s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cricketingwhite Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 On 13/05/2019 at 10:58, MickyD said: Standard of umpiring is very poor at the moment. A few seem to give LBW on loudness of appeal rather than where ball pitched and player position. Others seem to give one LBW every third appeal. Another thing; if all eleven players go up to appeal an LBW, it's nothing but cheating. How can a player stood on the boundary at square leg appeal an LBW other than he heard the ball hit the pad. Umpires should be warning teams for over-appealing. The Laws state that no player can be given out without the fielding side appealing. This shouldn't mean appeal everything. Couldn’t agree more. Played at Kearsley on Saturday, we had at least 3, if not 4, really bad LBW decisions go against us. Not only the standard, but the number of umpires seem to be reducing every year at an alarming rate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whizz Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 52 minutes ago, cricketingwhite said: Couldn’t agree more. Played at Kearsley on Saturday, we had at least 3, if not 4, really bad LBW decisions go against us. Not only the standard, but the number of umpires seem to be reducing every year at an alarming rate Having a tail Luis Reece couldn’t trust was Westhoughtons only problem on Saturday. Nowt to do with bad umpires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Horwich Posted May 15, 2019 Moderators Share Posted May 15, 2019 7 hours ago, Whizz said: Having a tail Luis Reece couldn’t trust was Westhoughtons only problem on Saturday. Nowt to do with bad umpires. In one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cricketingwhite Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 12 hours ago, Whizz said: Having a tail Luis Reece couldn’t trust was Westhoughtons only problem on Saturday. Nowt to do with bad umpires. Some daft ways of getting out from a couple of our lads, so I’m not blaming any umpires, it was just a comment about the inconsistency of them. Was a good competitive game. Contentious decisions will balance themselves out over the season I’m sure 👍🏻 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Horwich Posted May 15, 2019 Moderators Share Posted May 15, 2019 They will. Starting Sunday 🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo Posted May 24, 2019 Share Posted May 24, 2019 Whats the situation with little hulton and social? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whizz Posted May 26, 2019 Share Posted May 26, 2019 On 24/05/2019 at 17:24, scoobydoo said: Whats the situation with little hulton and social? A couple of their age groups have merged for the season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cricketingwhite Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 Daisy gone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.