Formation/tactics
- Replies 359
- Views 28.2k
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Stig 33 posts
-
gonzo 27 posts
-
Tonge moor green jacket 24 posts
-
Cheese 15 posts
Most Popular Posts
-
Why any player or wife would venture on to these areas of social media is beyond me. Absolute fuckin cesspit of bile and hatred led by faceless cunts with polarised views. It's just not a tr
-
Mr internet tough guy needs to get filled in.
-
How about F U C K r I G H T O f f
As suggested by @Johnnyrotten splitting this off from the transfer chat as a place for formation nerds like me to discuss tactics.
@wanderer1984 I agree 343 is a really weird formation. Off the top of my head I can only think of 2 teams playing it successfully in the last 20ish years - Brazil 2002 and Chelsea under Conte.
Brazil 2002 had Cafu and Roberto Carlos as the wing backs.... And a front 3 that was ridiculous, so don't really work as a comparison to any other team.
However Chelsea under Conte is interesting. The 3 at the back helped to not expose David Luiz when he'd invariably wander. And the wing backs were completely different, Alonso was previously a full back, and Moses previously a winger. And Chelsea would play Azpilicueta at RCB to cover Moses.
So @Rival Son I'm not sure we need 2 primarily attacking wing backs to make it work. Schon as more attacking and Cogley more defensive could be fine.
The bit we are missing is in midfield though. Both those teams had pure enforcers in the centre. Chelsea had Matic and Kanye, and Brazil had Gilberto Silva and Kleberson (more a hard worker but not a ball player definitely). This is where we seem way off it with Thomason and Sheehan. I like both but they're not enforcers.