I think the majority of Bolton supporters are resigned to losing Cahill this summer and Coyle has put him in the shop window with a massive advertising campaign. ?17 million seems to be the quoted figure time and time again.

 

But... But which clubs are realistically going to stump up the cash?

 

Looking at the 'big' clubs, they all already have CB's as good as/better than Cahill. Except for Arsenal, but Wenger's just ruled out any ?15m signings this summer.

If we got the following players in i would be happy with the squad for next season.

 

Sturridge

Nugent/bothroyd (take a punt sort of striker)

Onouha

Boyatta

Pratley

Barton

Warnock

 

Now if we managed to get all them our squad and team would be much better than as it stands imo. Obviously ive included cahill leaving and generating some cash to spend.

If we got the following players in i would be happy with the squad for next season.

 

Sturridge

Nugent/bothroyd (take a punt sort of striker)

Onouha

Boyatta

Pratley

Barton

Warnock

 

Now if we managed to get all them our squad and team would be much better than as it stands imo. Obviously ive included cahill leaving and generating some cash to spend.

 

I think we'd ALL be over the moon if that wish-list came true.

They don't want him: http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=222041

The latest stories about a swap sound a bit agent-generated. Don't see a shred of truth in it.

If we got the following players in i would be happy with the squad for next season.

 

Sturridge

Nugent/bothroyd (take a punt sort of striker)

Onouha

Boyatta

Pratley

Barton

Warnock

 

Now if we managed to get all them our squad and team would be much better than as it stands imo. Obviously ive included cahill leaving and generating some cash to spend.

 

Warnock would prob be a good and realistic signing

 

Sturridge hopeful but not optimistic

 

Barton - not even on our radar I wouldn't have thought, but that's not our fault

They don't want him: http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=222041

 

somebody tell cahill its off

 

city have pulled out cos some clowns on a football forum dont want him

I'm a bit annoyed with myself, but I actually got a bit angry reading some of the stuff on there.

 

You'd have thunk that Cahill is some big meat-head defender the way they talk about him. - ie references to "no nonsense".

 

If it wasn't for the fact that we'll, by far, get the best deal out of Citeh, I'd rather he went elsewhere.

 

Cunts, the lot of 'em.

You'd have thunk that Cahill is some big meat-head defender the way they talk about him. - ie references to "no nonsense".

 

Bolton fans cant wait to get rid of him. Coyle cant wait to get rid of him.

 

Apparently we all think he's crap. There was me thinking that the only reason we were interested in selling him was to raise some money to re-build the team.

Bolton fans cant wait to get rid of him. Coyle cant wait to get rid of him.

 

Apparently we all think he's crap. There was me thinking that the only reason we were interested in selling him was to raise some money to re-build the team.

 

Shows what Johnny-come-lately look-we've-now-got-money thick meatheads thay are.

How long before they can rival the Munich? two seasons? three? They're well on their way, yet again they always had the potential to be massive cunts.

 

I can pre-empt what these wankstains will answer, to any accusations of buying success in future...

 

(Adopt annoying Manc accent) "Yeah, but I was there in the dark days, division two - if we hadn't of had 'the Goat' back then...we deserve this and anyway we'd have been back here regardless, we're sleeping giants - the oil money just speeded (sic) the process up..."

 

tossers.

Edited May 26, 201115 yr by Youri McAnespie

is onuoha a centre half or a full back?

City season ticket holder at work says he is the quickest defender hes ever seen , so for that reason im in .

Just to re-open this thread, seems to be a lot of stories about saying Cahill to City deal could be dead.

 

Obviously not true, someone just wants to push the deal through on terms currently on the table.

 

Be finalised by weekend. Mark my words.

With Phil Jones signing for the munich bastards and turning Liverpool and Arsenal down, me thinks there might well be a three way battle for Cahill. With City the other team involved.

 

Let the bidding commence

Has nobody told Mourinho & Guardiola? Getting some foreign interest can only help swell the coffers.

His release clause is 17 million, so they will not be a bidding war, unless we get a good player thrown in with the deal. i.e 15 mill plus Onuoah

His release clause is 17 million, so they will not be a bidding war, unless we get a good player thrown in with the deal. i.e 15 mill plus Onuoah

Allegedly! there is no way you know that as a fact so we will just wait and see if it all the same!

Double post!

Edited June 8, 201115 yr by Theboybell

His release clause is 17 million, so they will not be a bidding war, unless we get a good player thrown in with the deal. i.e 15 mill plus Onuoah

?17M ?

 

That's ?2M higher than the lowest "release clause" and ?3M lower than the highest "release clause" that I have heard in the space of a week. I'm suprised he's got so many release clause values.....you would think just the one would do

Bolton News explicitly states he has a ?17 million buyout clause.

 

In any case, a swap deal would probably be far more beneficial for Bolton, given the sell-on clause to Villa. (Assuming we get the right players in).

 

How did Onuoha do at Sunderland?

Bolton News explicitly states he has a ?17 million buyout clause.

 

In any case, a swap deal would probably be far more beneficial for Bolton, given the sell-on clause to Villa. (Assuming we get the right players in).

 

How did Onuoha do at Sunderland?

 

Very well by all accounts, I would rip Citys hands off at the reported ?17m + Onuoha but I think the wheels are coming off this one. The worst thing for us was the fact that Toure will be back in September, if he got a good year ban Cahill would be at City now IMO.

 

Its worrying seeing Phil Jones go to United because that means United are out of the race. Its down to Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool or Spurs now and I cannot see any of these paying ?17m. I think it might drag on until August and we end up taking ?14m + Sturridge on loan for a year on loan from Chelsea. Be well worth it to get DS back on loan though.

So another series of 'insider' press releases by agents from each camp, first talking up then talking back down his chances of leaving. There will be an Arsenal renewed interest one tomorrow.

Take everything with a bucket of salt under you see a photo of the player holding a shirt or scarf on the pitch.

?17M ?

 

That's ?2M higher than the lowest "release clause" and ?3M lower than the highest "release clause" that I have heard in the space of a week. I'm suprised he's got so many release clause values.....you would think just the one would do

 

It was 15 million it rose to 17 million after his 1st England cap, ITK FACT

His release clause is 17 million, so they will not be a bidding war, unless we get a good player thrown in with the deal. i.e 15 mill plus Onuoah

Just because he has a release clause at 17mil surely that is not a limit. If, say arsenal are interested at 17 mil,but city want him more, surely they can put a higher bid in?, in any case not a bad profit as long as OC can get the cash to re-invest

Just because he has a release clause at 17mil surely that is not a limit. If, say arsenal are interested at 17 mil,but city want him more, surely they can put a higher bid in?, in any case not a bad profit as long as OC can get the cash to re-invest

 

No they will just offer him more money in terms of salary or a bigger signing on fee, He is free to talk to any club providing they meet the 17 million