Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted

That would be a shame. Its been non-stop intellectual BWFC-related debate with everybody since I registered.

 

Its hilarious that you call this a forum that doesn't suffer fools and you've got a moderator that doesn't even know how to ban people. Its probably just as well as he hasn't got a clue how to handle it. He intends to ban me despite being unable to give an example of a red-cardable offence I've committed apart from putting "Thanks for reading" at the end of each post, which has somehow had people seething. But if my head has to roll for the other posters' personality bypass, so be it.

 

Thanks for reading,

 

Gloria.

 

Get yer tits out.

 

Thanks for reading.

 

Walkden26

Posted

We presume he's injured.

 

It could be that Boyata wasn't fit enough to be risked for the whole game so Coyle begrudgingly put Stiensonn there instead.

 

He (GS) had a decent game. Broke no records but certainly didn't do anything to lose his place.

 

Hell, doing stuff wrong and losing your place as a result would have us fielding all the under 15s by now!

Posted

got in the ony pub on the rife showing the game, a geordie bar, and the gam had just kicked off, went bananas when I saw who our 2 full backs were

 

 

dogs load of abuse got thrown to newcastle too

Posted

Been on You Tube, there are about 3 or 4 different ones but none go beyond the hit and to the rection. Maybe Sky Sports are saving it for an X-rated out takes show.

Posted

Been on You Tube, there are about 3 or 4 different ones but none go beyond the hit and to the rection. Maybe Sky Sports are saving it for an X-rated out takes show.

I hope rection is reaction spelt wrong rather than missing an e

Posted

I hope rection is reaction spelt wrong rather than missing an e

 

 

You make a good ad valid point. I will. however, leave it to your own imagination.

Posted

That would be a shame. Its been non-stop intellectual BWFC-related debate with everybody since I registered.

 

Its hilarious that you call this a forum that doesn't suffer fools and you've got a moderator that doesn't even know how to ban people. Its probably just as well as he hasn't got a clue how to handle it. He intends to ban me despite being unable to give an example of a red-cardable offence I've committed apart from putting "Thanks for reading" at the end of each post, which has somehow had people seething. But if my head has to roll for the other posters' personality bypass, so be it.

 

Thanks for reading,

 

Gloria.

 

why do they need a reason to ban anyone?

 

if they think you are a boring prick surely 'the management' could ban you.

Posted

if they think you are a boring prick surely 'the management' could ban you.

 

but surely that sets a precedent which could feasibly wipe out half the board, yourself included!

Posted

but surely that sets a precedent which could feasibly wipe out half the board, yourself included!

 

I agree but the point is that surely anyone can be banned at anytime for no reason.

Posted

Don't think there's anything in the rules which say banning is prescriptive. The management can use descretion in not banning as much as they can in banning . . . i'd have thought.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

Time to lump on united or spurs for the title then!

 

Surely they will buy? Bidding war for Cahill anyone?

If City spark a bidding war to cover for someone that is banned for 3/4 games then football is more broken than I thought

Posted

i may be naive but i think we're past bidding wars

 

price agreed with chelsea means theres no 'war' to be had

 

the only bidding war would be over cahills wages

 

i think

Posted

So if we got a bid of ?10m from one of the Mancs, we can't accept it because we have given permission to Cahill to speak to Chelsea?? Rubbish

 

according to coyle, we wont accept any other offers, unless chelsea deal is dead.

 

maybe theres some for of pre contract, like when buying a house?

Posted

So if we got a bid of ?10m from one of the Mancs, we can't accept it because we have given permission to Cahill to speak to Chelsea?? Rubbish

I think the point is that now a fee has been agreed, everybody else will know what this is, and as such will offer the same. WHy would they offer more?

 

As pointed out by Cassie, the only "bidding war" now would be for the wages on offer

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.