Rizlar Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 Forest sack O Neill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Okocha10 Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 3 minutes ago, Rizlar said: Forest sack O Neill Deserves it for signing Ameobi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 1 hour ago, ZicoKelly said: blame Celtic Agreed. Smacks of Lennon and Celtic. Saying that I was only defending him yesterday saying goodbye luck to him. Fuck that now. Poor form all round Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 1 hour ago, dazl1212 said: ? I think homer is being a bit too clever as it’s a fair question/point you make. He must of been being paid as I thought he could break his deal with us? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traf Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 He's under contract and Celtic invite him for a tour and talks. After the day at Celtic, Luca informs the club of his desire to invoke the 14-day rule, which the club have rightly declined. Luca, his dad, his agent, Lennon & Celtic have all behaved like cunts here IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 Still no ill will to Connell. He ahad the chance to play for Celtic potentially in european games getting paid every month and try and get a regular spot in the Irish squad. or he can stick around in league one in a shit show with a team no fucker knows who will be in it that still doesn't know if it will exist to start the season. Take out the fact its us he's leaving and he'd be daft not to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter HomerJay Posted June 28, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted June 28, 2019 23 minutes ago, tomski said: I think homer is being a bit too clever as it’s a fair question/point you make. He must of been being paid as I thought he could break his deal with us? 😝 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 42 minutes ago, Traf said: He's under contract and Celtic invite him for a tour and talks. After the day at Celtic, Luca informs the club of his desire to invoke the 14-day rule, which the club have rightly declined. Luca, his dad, his agent, Lennon & Celtic have all behaved like cunts here IMO. Yep. He’s 17 so gets a bit of lee way but you are spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 26 minutes ago, frank_spencer said: Still no ill will to Connell. He ahad the chance to play for Celtic potentially in european games getting paid every month and try and get a regular spot in the Irish squad. or he can stick around in league one in a shit show with a team no fucker knows who will be in it that still doesn't know if it will exist to start the season. Take out the fact its us he's leaving and he'd be daft not to. Yep which I have no argument (except I don’t see Celtic or rangers as a big draw) my gripe is them trying to slimeball out for nowt. Fuck em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 47 minutes ago, Traf said: He's under contract and Celtic invite him for a tour and talks. After the day at Celtic, Luca informs the club of his desire to invoke the 14-day rule, which the club have rightly declined. Luca, his dad, his agent, Lennon & Celtic have all behaved like cunts here IMO. Is the correct answer. And surely there are rules about tapping players up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Okocha10 Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, mickbrown said: Is the correct answer. And surely there are rules about tapping players up? If what Liverpool was doing with Virgil Van Dijk was tapping a player up, Celtic should be getting done. Not like Brighton etc the other teams after him have invited him to there stadium & have talks with him to strengthen there position while hes under contract with us. Edited June 28, 2019 by Okocha10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted June 28, 2019 Moderators Share Posted June 28, 2019 He's a scholar, isn't he So probably a different set of rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluffy Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 I can't remember how this 14 day notice works? Yes, I understand why they can submit one but is it negated if the club pays the player his wages in full before the 14 days expires? If, as we are led to believe that the sale is imminent then presumably there's been an agreement with all the creditors reached, and that being so, football creditors (of which Connell is one) would be paid immediately. That being the case I can understand the Administrator saying in 14 days you will have been paid in full and if you want to go to Celtic or anywhere else then your new owner will want to discuss a more realistic offer for them to sign you as you are still under contract to BWFC. If it is not negated even though he is paid in full then please ignore what I've said. (Oh and just before someone might suggest that as he's on peanuts anyway, why not pay him in full now, I don't believe that to be possible as you can't treat one creditor more favourably than any other - so if the pay Connell, they would have to pay the rest of the players in full (and presumably everyone else) at the same time). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwfcfan5 Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, Sluffy said: I can't remember how this 14 day notice works? Yes, I understand why they can submit one but is it negated if the club pays the player his wages in full before the 14 days expires? If, as we are led to believe that the sale is imminent then presumably there's been an agreement with all the creditors reached, and that being so, football creditors (of which Connell is one) would be paid immediately. That being the case I can understand the Administrator saying in 14 days you will have been paid in full and if you want to go to Celtic or anywhere else then your new owner will want to discuss a more realistic offer for them to sign you as you are still under contract to BWFC. If it is not negated even though he is paid in full then please ignore what I've said. (Oh and just before someone might suggest that as he's on peanuts anyway, why not pay him in full now, I don't believe that to be possible as you can't treat one creditor more favourably than any other - so if the pay Connell, they would have to pay the rest of the players in full (and presumably everyone else) at the same time). From what Iles has said - so assuming he is right - when notice is submitted if they are paid in full within 14 days of that then the notice is negated. The thing might be - are new owners going to backdate player pay in full? I don't know.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Okocha10 Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 Did some of the academy players get paid from a certain month? I think I can remember Anderson one month paid all the academy players but not the first team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leyther_Matt Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 19 minutes ago, Casino said: He's a scholar, isn't he So probably a different set of rules Pay up his contract in full - probably cheaper than a tribunal - and on we go. Lad is looking after himself, we’ve got no protection because we weren’t in a position to put him on a pro contract and he’s moving outside of England so compensation is negligible. Essentially no different to if he was a 14 year old in the academy. Such is life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 He’s on fuck all isn’t he? Pay him and stick him back in the youth team playing in front of the mams and dads Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted June 28, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted June 28, 2019 Just now, mickbrown said: He’s on fuck all isn’t he? Pay him and stick him back in the youth team playing in front of the mams and dads If his head has been turned why bother. Get as much as we can however small. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 1 minute ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: If his head has been turned why bother. Get as much as we can however small. Cos I’m vindictive like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted June 28, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted June 28, 2019 1 minute ago, mickbrown said: Cos I’m vindictive like that. Ha. When the club is owned by billionaires I'd go with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 Fingers crossed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomski Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: If his head has been turned why bother. Get as much as we can however small. Agree. Screw Celtic and lennons budget for all we can Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted June 28, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted June 28, 2019 1 minute ago, tomski said: Agree. Screw Celtic and lennons budget for all we can And when Lennon throws a hissy fit because they won't give him the funds, they flirt him and bring O'Neil in! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluffy Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 22 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said: From what Iles has said - so assuming he is right - when notice is submitted if they are paid in full within 14 days of that then the notice is negated. The thing might be - are new owners going to backdate player pay in full? I don't know.... They have to do he is a footballing creditor - the new owners can't exit Admin without paying them in full first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Steejay Posted June 28, 2019 Site Supporter Share Posted June 28, 2019 31 minutes ago, Sluffy said: I can't remember how this 14 day notice works? Yes, I understand why they can submit one but is it negated if the club pays the player his wages in full before the 14 days expires? If, as we are led to believe that the sale is imminent then presumably there's been an agreement with all the creditors reached, and that being so, football creditors (of which Connell is one) would be paid immediately. That being the case I can understand the Administrator saying in 14 days you will have been paid in full and if you want to go to Celtic or anywhere else then your new owner will want to discuss a more realistic offer for them to sign you as you are still under contract to BWFC. If it is not negated even though he is paid in full then please ignore what I've said. (Oh and just before someone might suggest that as he's on peanuts anyway, why not pay him in full now, I don't believe that to be possible as you can't treat one creditor more favourably than any other - so if the pay Connell, they would have to pay the rest of the players in full (and presumably everyone else) at the same time). Yep, if we only paid him, then the others might go on strike... Oh, wait... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.