January 19, 20188 yr She will obviously stand now her hormones have taken over and let a man do the job. Best way; it might be a bit distracting having a baby on t'tit whilst addressing her cabinet.
January 19, 20188 yr Men can give birth. They've done it in China. The nipper comes out of his arse. They shove a bar of special soap up first to sanitise the area.
January 19, 20188 yr Best way; it might be a bit distracting having a baby on t'tit whilst addressing her cabinet. Wasn’t it an Aussie MP who had a toddler chomping on her knockers in their Parliament down there ?
January 19, 20188 yr I’ll answer that myself https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AsOy3vc9o5E Bolty spat his chips n gravy all over the laptop when he saw it...
January 19, 20188 yr I’ll answer that myself https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AsOy3vc9o5E Bolty spat his chips n gravy all over the laptop when he saw it... I can't (daren't) watch that just now but think I've seen it before. I'm all for it. That's not a joke btw Seeing my mrs go through hell for a few weeks trying to breastfeed was enough to associate it with anything but sex. Our lad had an unknown tied tongue so he sucked for hours and got next to nothing. Her nips were a right mess. Once snipped he was off! She fed like that for almost a year, bless her!
January 19, 20188 yr Men can give birth. They've done it in China. The nipper comes out of his arse. They shove a bar of special soap up first to sanitise the area. I thought women must piss out of their arse until I was about 6.... Cue LW :-)
January 19, 20188 yr I thought women must piss out of their arse until I was about 6.... Cue LW :-) I saw a video from Gonzo yesterday where the highlight was a couple of birds expelling piss from their arses. Not their piss, obvs.
January 19, 20188 yr I saw a video from Gonzo yesterday where the highlight was a couple of birds expelling piss from their arses. Not their piss, obvs. So is it true or isn't it? Life is just so confusing sometimes! :-)
January 20, 20188 yr Author I’ll answer that myself https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AsOy3vc9o5E Bolty spat his chips n gravy all over the laptop when he saw it... Actually mate, I am a massive supporter of breast feeding and don't get the (probably) faux outrage some seem to feel at the slightest glimpse of a bit of breast flesh. One of the most natural acts in the world. Just do not get how anyone can be offended by that. Has to be associated with sexual repression.
January 21, 20188 yr 1) - probably because as I've already mentioned a large proportion of the time when women are building up the necessary skills and experience to become headteachers is interrupted by having and nurturing their children. You could also argue that from a biological point of view - having greater amounts of testosterone makes taking risky behaviours (such as putting yourself forward for promotion etc) more likely. 2) - As I've already pointed out - it's my understanding that once you account for variables - women don't actually earn less than men overall. If you interpret the data without taking these variables into account then you draw poor conclusions. 3) - Because that senior journalist (who I'd never even heard of before) was comparing her pay to one of the most well known presenters in radio. IE the same reason (albeit on a much smaller scale) why Madonna gets paid more than Wagner off X Factor - despite the fact that they both do the same 'job'. I'm fully aware that I'm using some anecdotal evidence - but I'm also aware that of the 'problem' was as widespread as you appear to think it is - I would have encountered numerous examples of it happening and would have done my best to fight the corner of whoever was being discriminated against. But as I say - I've never seen this force in action - maybe you have and can give me specific examples? Maybe I just have lived a life where this problem hasn't manifested itself to any noticeable degree? I take your point that you feel it's a systematic, endemic problem. However - I think that we have moved and continue to move in a direction which aims to forcibly ensure parity. I'd say we're pretty close if not actually at that point already and far too much energy and time is being devoted to a problem which doesn't exist to the extent that we pretend it does. I'd much rather we focused on the real disparities - such as those between the regions or health inequalities rather than the largely theoretical one between the sexes. The fact that you think the real disparities are between religion and health makes me worry slightly. I we are nowhere close to equality, if you think we are then we need to have this chat not over this forum, mate.
January 21, 20188 yr The fact that you think the real disparities are between religion and health makes me worry slightly. I we are nowhere close to equality, if you think we are then we need to have this chat not over this forum, mate. Regions - not religions. And from a health perspective I meant the fact that someone born in Halliwell is likely to die 12 years earlier that someone born in Heaton - to pick just one example.
January 21, 20188 yr someone born in Halliwell is likely to die 12 years earlier that someone born in Heaton I expect that they will be grateful for that.
January 24, 20188 yr can't really comment on something such as this, because I've never been invited to such a do Men Only: Inside the charity fundraiser where hostesses are put on show https://www.ft.com/content/075d679e-0033-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5
January 24, 20188 yr can't really comment on something such as this, because I've never been invited to such a do Men Only: Inside the charity fundraiser where hostesses are put on show https://www.ft.com/content/075d679e-0033-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5 That kind of stuff has been going on since time began. Leave em to it. Same as a gaggle of women flocking round some dude squirting cream on his todger.
January 24, 20188 yr That kind of stuff has been going on since time began. Leave em to it. Same as a gaggle of women flocking round some dude squirting cream on his todger. Aye - my first thought was Magic Mike or Full Monty. No-ones forced. I find the sex segregation odd in this day and age but don't think it should be a problem if a load of rich folk want to exclude women. Par for the course, isn't it?
January 24, 20188 yr That kind of stuff has been going on since time began. Leave em to it. Same as a gaggle of women flocking round some dude squirting cream on his todger. Aye - my first thought was Magic Mike or Full Monty. No-ones forced. I find the sex segregation odd in this day and age but don't think it should be a problem if a load of rich folk want to exclude women. Par for the course, isn't it? I think the main point was all these blokes turn up thinking the hostesses are fair game, just because they are there which makes it all a bit seedy if the blokes are going to proposition the women working there, why not just hire a load of hookers for the night and just turn it into a massive orgy once the blokes are piped off you massively increase the potential for charitable donations as an aside I want to go to one of those Eyes Wide Shut type parties before I die, so if you know anyone, give us a shout Edited January 24, 20188 yr by ZicoKelly
January 24, 20188 yr I think the main point was all these blokes turn up thinking the hostesses are fair game, just because they are there which makes it all a bit seedy if the blokes are going to proposition the women working there, why not just hire a load of hookers for the night and just turn it into a massive orgy once the blokes are piped off you massively increase the potential for charitable donations as an aside I want to go to one of those Eyes Wide Shut type parties before I die, so if you know anyone, give us a shout Killing Kittens is now in Manchester so your luck could be in!
January 24, 20188 yr I think the main point was all these blokes turn up thinking the hostesses are fair game, just because they are there which makes it all a bit seedy if the blokes are going to proposition the women working there, why not just hire a load of hookers for the night and just turn it into a massive orgy once the blokes are piped off you massively increase the potential for charitable donations as an aside I want to go to one of those Eyes Wide Shut type parties before I die, so if you know anyone, give us a shout Me and you both! Minus the death(s), obvs. I see that about the hostesses but they are being asked to dress in a provocative manner - hardly a massive leap to see what will happen. Not condoning any groping but I'd bet a fair few took some 'tips' and offered a special arrangement . . . As long as no-ones forced to do anything they don't want, leave em to it. All just a big power trip for sad middle aged men, really.
January 24, 20188 yr Killing Kittens is now in Manchester so your luck could be in! just had a look at the website you reckon it will be as sexy as the pictures: https://www.killingkittens.com/ or like what I imagine the dogging car parks up rivvy end up like
January 24, 20188 yr The Economist magazine wrote an interesting piece on the ‘ge fee pay gap’ - not sure if it’s been posted before Basically saying that in like for like positions the gap is less than 1% both in the UK and across the EU https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/08/daily-chart Key snippet... “According to data for 8.7m employees worldwide gathered by Korn Ferry, a consultancy, women in Britain make just 1% less than men who have the same function and level at the same employer. In most European countries, the discrepancy is similarly small.” Personally, I’ve never seen an example of women being overlooked because of sex, everyone I have worked for has wanted the best person for the job over anything else. Then again I’ve always worked for Blue Chip firms who are quite good at all that sort of stuff and it’s a results business so who cares who it is as long as they bring the numbers in I started with my previous firm at the same time as a girl who I became good friends with. We were of similar ability and our careers shadowed each other’s for some time, including pay. However she has since been on maternity three times and is currently working 3 days a week whilst her children are very young. She probably earns less than half what I do now and she is a good step or two on the career ladder behind me, but then again she’s probably only worked for a third of the time that I have over the last 6 years and hasn’t continued to develop her skills at the same rate Over the course of our careers I will likely earn much more than her and finish in a more scenior position but she has chosen to concentrate more on family than her career. I’d bet when we both retire I would have worked a good 2,000 working days more than her and built up key experience in that time. If anyone said that it’s an injustice that she hasn’t earnt the same money as me over a career then they are barmy It’s not that long a go that women got to retire before men, how were they suppose to earn the same amount over a whole career finishing years before their male counterparts? Barmy Edited January 24, 20188 yr by birch-chorley
January 24, 20188 yr The Economist magazine wrote an interesting piece on the ‘ge fee pay gap’ - not sure if it’s been posted before Basically saying that in like for like positions the gap is less than 1% both in the UK and across the EU https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/08/daily-chart Key snippet... “According to data for 8.7m employees worldwide gathered by Korn Ferry, a consultancy, women in Britain make just 1% less than men who have the same function and level at the same employer. In most European countries, the discrepancy is similarly small.” Personally, I’ve never seen an example of women being overlooked because of sex, everyone I have worked for has wanted the best person for the job over anything else. Then again I’ve always worked for Blue Chip firms who are quite good at all that sort of stuff and it’s a results business so who cares who it is as long as they bring the numbers in I started with my previous firm at the same time as a girl who I became good friends with. We were of similar ability and our careers shadowed each other’s for some time, including pay. However she has since been on maternity three times and is currently working 3 days a week whilst her children are very young. She probably earns less than half what I do now and she is a good step or two on the career ladder behind me, but then again she’s probably only worked for a third of the time that I have over the last 6 years and hasn’t continued to develop her skills at the same rate Over the course of our careers I will likely earn much more than her and finish in a more scenior position but she has chose to concentrate more on family than her career. I’d bet when we both retire I would have worked a good 2,000 working days more than her and built up key experience in that time. If anyone said that it’s an injustice that she hasn’t earnt the same money as me over a career then they are barmy It’s not that long a go that women got to retire before men, how were they suppose to earn the same amount over a whole career finishing years before their male counterparts? Barmy Don't talk sense
January 24, 20188 yr Like for like positions being the key point here. Also why should she have to concentrate more on her family than career. I'm afraid all these 'arguments' just back up the issues to state don't exist. When they clearly do. And it's barmy to suggest otherwise, I'm afraid. But as this little bubble of white men seem to have to angle on it, I'll step away and leave you to ponder that little irony.
January 24, 20188 yr Like for like positions being the key point here. Also why should she have to concentrate more on her family than career. I'm afraid all these 'arguments' just back up the issues to state don't exist. When they clearly do. And it's barmy to suggest otherwise, I'm afraid. But as this little bubble of white men seem to have to angle on it, I'll step away and leave you to ponder that little irony. She doesn't, it's a choice! You know, vaginas and all that . . .
January 24, 20188 yr Like for like positions being the key point here. Also why should she have to concentrate more on her family than career. I'm afraid all these 'arguments' just back up the issues to state don't exist. When they clearly do. And it's barmy to suggest otherwise, I'm afraid. But as this little bubble of white men seem to have to angle on it, I'll step away and leave you to ponder that little irony. She didn’t have to concentrate more on her family than her career, she chose that path Her partner is in the same industry and at a similar level, shared paternity was on the table but she wanted to have the time with the child. She can work 5 days a week and her husband can do 3 but she wants it the other way My company pay the same for paternity leave as they do maternity yet my wife only let me have 6 weeks as she wanted the rest of it. She is also pushing to go to 4 days a week after baby 2 It’s likely that her career won’t go as far due to the fact she will only work for 80% of the time that some of her colleagues will, she will certainly earn 20% less at the beginning These are all choices, they arent forced on women
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.