Love him or hate him the lads got some nuts, caught this lad a cracker here.

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_BNP2y7ELus&feature=youtu.be

10 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

I wonder what the stats are for certain people in prison as opposed to their so called population in the UK ?

No wonder Cheese loves those sort of people. He probably wanks off over real events of rape and grooming, if his sick freakish rape fantasy is anything to go by. No wonder his ex fucked him off.

 

I know that the Muslim  prison population is rising more than all other religions combined, 

4 minutes ago, royal white said:

I’m sure you’ve  already seen examples but if not Have a look online at some of the cases where judges have let folk off with a slap on the wrists. We know prisons are over crowded should we be filling them up for crimes such as this, or would you rather see paedos, nonces, burglars etc banged up. It’s alright saying bang them all up but there doesn’t seem to be the room. 

You've answered everything apart from my question there. That's some going! 🙂

 

1 minute ago, kent_white said:

You've answered everything apart from my question there. That's some going! 🙂

 

If I was a judge, I would look at the crime and prob give him a fine like some of the big newspapers have had over the years and some CS. Don’t know why you think anyone would let him go scot free. 

8 minutes ago, royal white said:

I know that the Muslim  prison population is rising more than all other religions combined, 

I wonder why that would be mate ?

7 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

I wonder why that would be mate ?

Surely that's a good thing though isn't it? Demonstrates that the days of fearing to prosecute through fear of being labelled racist are long gone?

And part of the reason why you don't want TR stood outside court fucking trials up!

12 minutes ago, royal white said:

If I was a judge, I would look at the crime and prob give him a fine like some of the big newspapers have had over the years and some CS. Don’t know why you think anyone would let him go scot free. 

Fair enough. You can't really put a newspaper in prison though can you? What would you do when he does it a third time?

Just now, kent_white said:

Surely that's a good thing though isn't it? Demonstrates that the days of fearing to prosecute through fear of being labelled racist are long gone?

And part of the reason why you don't want TR stood outside court fucking trials up!

True mate, but let’s look at proximate cause and why Robinson was there. 

3 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Fair enough. You can't really put a newspaper in prison though can you? What would you do when he does it a third time?

Im sure you could find someone liable. And I’m sure there’s many thousands of folk who didn’t get custodial sentences.

Can you give me Saturdays lotto numbers please.

3 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

True mate, but let’s look at proximate cause and why Robinson was there. 

Because he's a media whore who can't stand to be out of the limelight for more than 5 minutes and has deluded himself that these people won't be brought to justice unless he 'highlights it'?

2 minutes ago, royal white said:

Im sure you could find someone liable. And I’m sure there’s many thousands of folk who didn’t get custodial sentences.

Can you give me Saturdays lotto numbers please.

I think it's a reasonable question. At what stage do you think a custodial sentence would be appropriate. The third time, fourth time, fifth time - or should he get ever increasing fines until the stage that he genuinely does fuck a nonces trial up and only then get banged up?

4 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Because he's a media whore who can't stand to be out of the limelight for more than 5 minutes and has deluded himself that these people won't be brought to justice unless he 'highlights it'?

Spot on mate, he craves the attention and loot without doubt.

For balance as always, his dwarf sidekick helped recently re that poor Telford family who got death threats from the groomers. Nice to see the local MP getting involved now.

6 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Because he's a media whore who can't stand to be out of the limelight for more than 5 minutes and has deluded himself that these people won't be brought to justice unless he 'highlights it'?

Sorry mate, I should have also said the actual proximate cause he was there, is the groomers and rapists.

If they hadn’t raped and groomed young kids, then he wouldn’t be there.....

Am I right ?

You know I am ....

7 minutes ago, kent_white said:

I think it's a reasonable question. At what stage do you think a custodial sentence would be appropriate. The third time, fourth time, fifth time - or should he get ever increasing fines until the stage that he genuinely does fuck a nonces trial up and only then get banged up?

You like to use a lot of if, what’s and maybes. He’s been done for contempt of court like thousands of others. He’s been jailed unlike thousands of others. There’s full on wrong uns walking the streets but the judges seem more concerned about jailing someone for being on Facebook live? 

Do you think that’s right? 

9 minutes ago, kent_white said:

I think it's a reasonable question. At what stage do you think a custodial sentence would be appropriate. The third time, fourth time, fifth time - or should he get ever increasing fines until the stage that he genuinely does fuck a nonces trial up and only then get banged up?

Here you go mate, what’s your thoughts on those groomers back on the streets of Rochdale ?

Why do certain CONVICTED NONCES AND TERRORISTS GET LEGAL AID whilst some of the victims and their families don’t ?

London Bridge terror attack is the most recent and classic example of this miscarriage of justice.

 

14 minutes ago, royal white said:

You like to use a lot of if, what’s and maybes. He’s been done for contempt of court like thousands of others. He’s been jailed unlike thousands of others. There’s full on wrong uns walking the streets but the judges seem more concerned about jailing someone for being on Facebook live? 

Do you think that’s right? 

The judge can only judge what's put in front of them. I'm sure if they had one cell and the judge had TR in one dock and a nonce in the other - the judge would choose to put the nonce in jail. As would we all. You're conflating two separate points though.

I can't talk about the 'thousands of others' who've been done for contempt. I don't know what any of the circumstances are. Although I'm pretty sure if they got warned about something and then continued to do it they'd get banged up. Especially if they've got a criminal record and a history of violence to begin with.

7 minutes ago, kent_white said:

The judge can only judge what's put in front of them. I'm sure if they had one cell and the judge had TR in one dock and a nonce in the other - the judge would choose to put the nonce in jail. As would we all. You're conflating two separate points though.

I can't talk about the 'thousands of others' who've been done for contempt. I don't know what any of the circumstances are. Although I'm pretty sure if they got warned about something and then continued to do it they'd get banged up. Especially if they've got a criminal record and a history of violence to begin with.

The point ive been making the last few days is there’s a lot worse walking the streets, a hell of a lot worse. It seems many people are happy with TR being jailed but turn a blind eye to others being let off. With prisons being so over run sure there should be some kind of order as to who gets banged up. What’s the chances of TR going straight to a high risk prison for the likes of murderers, rapists, terrorists etc. Is that somewhere you’d expect someone to go for a 19 week sentence for contempt of court. Probably cost the tax payer a lot more.

6 minutes ago, royal white said:

The point ive been making the last few days is there’s a lot worse walking the streets, a hell of a lot worse. It seems many people are happy with TR being jailed but turn a blind eye to others being let off. With prisons being so over run sure there should be some kind of order as to who gets banged up. What’s the chances of TR going straight to a high risk prison for the likes of murderers, rapists, terrorists etc. Is that somewhere you’d expect someone to go for a 19 week sentence for contempt of court. Probably cost the tax payer a lot more.

I agree there are a hell of a lot worse walking the streets. They're not on telly every day though or sticking themselves in the limelight. TR is - so we talk about him.

He's also a useful reference point for the lens you view the world through. He's divisive - so he's interesting to talk about. It doesn't mean anybody thinks he's more deserving of prison time than a nonce though.

And I'm not happy or sad that TR has been jailed. I'm certainly not gloating about it. I'm pleased that justice has taken its course and we've not been cowed by populism. Which would be just as dangerous as being cowed by political correctness has proved to be. In my eyes anyway!

20 minutes ago, kent_white said:

I agree there are a hell of a lot worse walking the streets. They're not on telly every day though or sticking themselves in the limelight. TR is - so we talk about him.

He's also a useful reference point for the lens you view the world through. He's divisive - so he's interesting to talk about. It doesn't mean anybody thinks he's more deserving of prison time than a nonce though.

And I'm not happy or sad that TR has been jailed. I'm certainly not gloating about it. I'm pleased that justice has taken its course and we've not been cowed by populism. Which would be just as dangerous as being cowed by political correctness has proved to be. In my eyes anyway!

Spot for re political correctness.

That clip where Nazir Azfal speaks re the government memo speaks volumes.

Sad sign of the times.

He’s been potted because his actions threatened to let the pedos walk free.

Seems pretty straight forward and correct to me.

I don’t give a fuck what he does to be honest because he just comes across as small time, but if him ballooning outside court had caused guilty folk to walk free, then he deserves it.

He’s deffo gonna get chivved by Muslim in prison at some point.

8 minutes ago, gonzo said:

He’s deffo gonna get chivved by Muslim in prison at some point.

Best way to avoid that is stop breaking the law and ending up infront of the beak.

No sympathy for the bell end. 

It's shit that he gets jail time and those who've committed 'more serious' crime walk away with fines/curfew/CS. But that says more about how the courts are too lenient on those people rather than SYL

5 hours ago, barryk32 said:

How safe do you reckon he'll be inside or is it back to solitary for his own good?

There will be plenty watching his back, no governor on the planet would want the had publicity if anything happened to him, they get enough of that as it is

It's a lesson to learn that you don't step on the big brother's foot of the establishment, being a swivel eyed right wing loony, or a rabid left wing fanatic, it does not make any difference in this country now.

1 minute ago, leigh white said:

It's a lesson to learn that you don't step on the big brother's foot of the establishment, being a swivel eyed right wing loony, or a rabid left wing fanatic, it does not make any difference in this country now.

It's a lesson that you shouldn't go livestreaming defendants outside court whilst giving a full commentary, during a trial on which you know there are reporting restrictions. Simple as that.