A couple of things on here and my facebook have got me thinking, which are the best conspiracy bollocks you have heard recently?

I love this one as I work pretty much exclusively on 5G these days...

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10219870648422466&id=1408443354

 

12 minutes ago, fatolive said:

So do other things in other feeds though ? 
same as some things make us fart more and some things prevent farting and change how you react to foodstuffs  etc? 
don’t think it’s harmful to the cow ? 
May be wrong as I haven’t read much of this , there may be more than breaking down enzymes , but farmers been giving digestion aids in feeds for years , seaweed etc, not sure what’s so bad about this one and why it’s caused such a response that previous things didn’t ? 

Seaweed, minerals, etc are naturally occurring foodstuffs. 

This additive stops/reduces the production of a hormone.

Quite different.

There have been previous issues with food additives- maybe they've been lost over time- but BSE (mad cow disease is an example)

The UK also forbids the use of growth hormones in livestock too, to protect people from them being passed on through the food chain. 

Unfortunately, problems are always predictable, and arise later.

3 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

You might, but I'd like to keep it!

Still plays a digestive function, and I'd be a bit miffed if Amazon insisted I have it out for the benefit of the planet.

Don't suppose anyone would bother about my coxxyx, unless it releases something nasty.

I'd quite happily sacrifice my appendix if it meant keeping global temperature changes to less than 1.5 degrees c. 

You selfish bastard! 😂

11 minutes ago, kent_white said:

I'd quite happily sacrifice my appendix if it meant keeping global temperature changes to less than 1.5 degrees c. 

You selfish bastard! 😂

Just think of the methane released by all those decomposing appendixes. 

1 minute ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Just think of the methane released by all those decomposing appendixes. 

🤣

5 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Seaweed, minerals, etc are naturally occurring foodstuffs. 

This additive stops/reduces the production of a hormone.

Quite different.

There have been previous issues with food additives- maybe they've been lost over time- but BSE (mad cow disease is an example)

The UK also forbids the use of growth hormones in livestock too, to protect people from them being passed on through the food chain. 

Unfortunately, problems are always predictable, and arise later.

So does sea weed , that’s my point, it isn’t quite different , it’s the same thing but ones natural and ones man made but they both do the same thing , block the offending enzyme 

if reducing gas by inhibiting the enzyme is all this boaver does that is , as I totally agree with the additives bit , and base was a good example , but in this case, as I understand , yes one’s a natural way of doing it , well uses  natural ingredient at least and  the other a man made additive that does the same thing within the cow ? 
 

6 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Seaweed, minerals, etc are naturally occurring foodstuffs. 

This additive stops/reduces the production of a hormone.

Quite different.

There have been previous issues with food additives- maybe they've been lost over time- but BSE (mad cow disease is an example)

The UK also forbids the use of growth hormones in livestock too, to protect people from them being passed on through the food chain. 

Unfortunately, problems are always predictable, and arise later.

BSE was caused by feeding cattle bone meal originating from infected dead cattle, and dead sheep infected with scrapie. I mean what could possibly go wrong.

Not your normal food additive really. 

The “sun cream is bad for you” theory is getting some momentum. Utter fkin weirdos. 

9 minutes ago, royal white said:

The “sun cream is bad for you” theory is getting some momentum. Utter fkin weirdos. 

Burkas all the way.

Never see a Muslimlamic with skin cancer do you eh?

1 hour ago, royal white said:

The “sun cream is bad for you” theory is getting some momentum. Utter fkin weirdos. 

Don't drink it

Seeing a lot about the CIA paying to arm and aid the Houthi rebels (and ultimately, eventually destroy them) so they can help establish Israel's own version of the Suez Canal and control global trade and tariffs. They'll need a large part of the West Bank in order to navigate it around established Israeli towns and cities.

It kinda makes sense to be fair..

 

1 hour ago, boltonboris said:

Seeing a lot about the CIA paying to arm and aid the Houthi rebels (and ultimately, eventually destroy them) so they can help establish Israel's own version of the Suez Canal and control global trade and tariffs. They'll need a large part of the West Bank in order to navigate it around established Israeli towns and cities.

It kinda makes sense to be fair..

 

Apart from the Houthi attacks being 1400 miles south.

Wheres this canal going?

5 hours ago, royal white said:

The “sun cream is bad for you” theory is getting some momentum. Utter fkin weirdos. 

laced with 5G.

and COVID

2 hours ago, green genie said:

Apart from the Houthi attacks being 1400 miles south.

Wheres this canal going?

Cut all the way through to the Gulf of Aqaba into the Red Sea, presumably - Those were the original plans for it before it was shelved anyway.

Just now, boltonboris said:

Cut all the way through to the Gulf of Aqaba into the Red Sea, presumably - Those were the original plans for it before it was shelved anyway.

It actually was mooted as a joint venture between the USA and Israel decades ago. Ben Gurion Canal

5 hours ago, boltonboris said:

Seeing a lot about the CIA paying to arm and aid the Houthi rebels (and ultimately, eventually destroy them) so they can help establish Israel's own version of the Suez Canal and control global trade and tariffs. They'll need a large part of the West Bank in order to navigate it around established Israeli towns and cities.

It kinda makes sense to be fair..

 

Where are you seeing all this lot?

Heard absolutely nothing, anywhere to that effect. 

3 hours ago, boltonboris said:

Cut all the way through to the Gulf of Aqaba into the Red Sea, presumably - Those were the original plans for it before it was shelved anyway.

So 1300 miles north of any Houthi attack. 

 

16 hours ago, green genie said:

So 1300 miles north of any Houthi attack. 

 

The Red Sea?

Is this them Chem trails? 🙂

 

 

you know it's bollocks if it has Daily Mail written on it.

On 19/03/2026 at 13:06, Traf said:

you know it's bollocks if it has Daily Mail written on it.

And they will want you to sign up for something.

On 19/03/2026 at 13:06, Traf said:

you know it's bollocks if it has Daily Mail written on it.

What if the guardian reported it 👀

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/shortcuts/2015/feb/16/can-the-cia-weaponise-the-weather-geoengineering

1 hour ago, royal white said:

What if the guardian reported it 👀

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/shortcuts/2015/feb/16/can-the-cia-weaponise-the-weather-geoengineering

 If HAARP really was so successful, it would probably not be closing this year.
 

The Guardian is pretty dismissive of the claims tbf based on the quote above. 

Edited March 20Mar 20 by Ani