no balls Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 Yes or No - would you let your kids stay over at a queers house. The answer is the same as any other stay over. As long as I'd met the parents and thought they were decent folk, then yes. If they were complete cocks who shouldn't be in charge of the tv remote let alone, a little person, I'd say no.
Smiffs Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 The answer is the same as any other stay over. As long as I'd met the parents and thought they were decent folk, then yes. If they were complete cocks who shouldn't be in charge of the tv remote let alone, a little person, I'd say no. Fair answer to a fair question
Horwich Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 Gonna have to close this thread. I have had a pm from one of our members who is Homosexual. (Won't name names) But if we could have not further comments on this thread, Casino would be happy. Thanks Horwich
Bea Smith Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 Imagine your mates coming round to play and seeing your parents do this they could say 'my dads a siamese twin'
Bea Smith Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 A serious comment- Being homosexual is totally different from being a paedophile. Do not confuse the two. If this is an issue then what about lesbians adopting boys and gays adopting girls??
Guest The Special One Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 A serious comment- Being homosexual is totally different from being a paedophile. Do not confuse the two.If this is an issue then what about lesbians adopting boys and gays adopting girls?? I wouldn't want my lad living with faggots if I couldn't look after him. If God thought queers were natural, he would of given them the ability to reproduce naturally..........double fact
no balls Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 I wouldn't want my lad living with faggots if I couldn't look after him.If God thought queers were natural, he would of given them the ability to reproduce naturally..........double fact God? He has some odd ideas of what's natural if you beleive the church. Back on the Catholic priests again...... So women who can't are freaks then? You're just being silly now.
Bea Smith Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 Isnt there some sort of saying that the extreme gay bashers are the closet shirtlifters?
BWFCOLINH58 Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 I just wanted to point out that parents can be crap whether they be their birth ones, adopted ones or foster ones. Straight, bisexual or gay. I would hope my child didn't have an issue if someone on their class had gay parents and would explain to them it doesn't make them bad parents in the same way as I would tell my child not to be cruel if a child's parents were the local scumbags. There's a saying regarding the sins of the father but I don't recall it fully. 'The sins of the fathers shall be visited upon the sons.'
no balls Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 'The sins of the fathers shall be visited upon the sons.' Cheers. It's a most unfair adage.
Bea Smith Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 Another thought- what would be more dangerous for a young boy? 1- Living with openly homosexual parents who are vetted/supervised more often...or 2- Living with a straight bloke- who may actually be masking tendancies towards boys whilst hiding behind the respectable married man facade?? Number 2 scares me more. openly homosexual people have an outlet already for their tendancies. and i repeat BEING GAY IS NOT BEING A PAEDOPHILE Would be interesting to get some statistics on what percentage of sexual attacks on young boys were actually carried out by openly homosexual men. Something tells me it will be a lot less than the 'hidden ' homosexual.
no balls Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 Another thought- what would be more dangerous for a young boy?1- Living with openly homosexual parents who are vetted/supervised more often...or 2- Living with a straight bloke- who may actually be masking tendancies towards boys whilst hiding behind the respectable married man facade?? Number 2 scares me more. openly homosexual people have an outlet already for their tendancies. and i repeat BEING GAY IS NOT BEING A PAEDOPHILE Would be interesting to get some statistics on what percentage of sexual attacks on young boys were actually carried out by openly homosexual men. Something tells me it will be a lot less than the 'hidden ' homosexual. Eggf??ckingzacerly. Missus C - Speaker of sense! As an aside, alledgedly, transvestites are less likely to be gay than their trouser wearing counterparts.
Guest The Special One Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 Another thought- what would be more dangerous for a young boy?1- Living with openly homosexual parents who are vetted/supervised more often...or 2- Living with a straight bloke- who may actually be masking tendancies towards boys whilst hiding behind the respectable married man facade?? Number 2 scares me more. openly homosexual people have an outlet already for their tendancies. and i repeat BEING GAY IS NOT BEING A PAEDOPHILE Would be interesting to get some statistics on what percentage of sexual attacks on young boys were actually carried out by openly homosexual men. Something tells me it will be a lot less than the 'hidden ' homosexual. well if they are a "hidden homosexual", they are still f??ckin bent no balls, have you got a friend whos a queer and wants children???
Bea Smith Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 well if they are a "hidden homosexual", they are still f??ckin bentno balls, have you got a friend whos a queer and wants children??? TSO- you miss my point entirely. I am pointing out that its not openly homosexual men that are a danger to our children. Whilst i am by no means saying that closet gays are all peados , i am saying that the closet ones pose more of a threat than the openly gay ones, because people assume they are safer. ignorance may be bliss- but its also feckin dangerous.
no balls Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 no balls, have you got a friend whos a queer and wants children??? No, I just really don't have an issue with homosexuality and think their parenting skills wouldn't be any worse than pikey's teaching their kids to sponge off the state, have babies with their distant relatives and generally live a pointless life with not even the sniff of success. Maybe it's the yoghurt and mung bean salad I had a work that's making me go all liberal but I really don't think being homosexual should stop you being able to care well for a child.
Ani Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 every comparison you are making in defence of this is comparing being parented by a same sex couple who are the height of respectability and then someone off the catherine tate show. if there are enough properly vetted hetrosexual couples who want to adopt should gays still be allowed to ? should adoption agencies that disagree with this be forced to accept gay couples ? has any research been done on the impact of being adopted by single sex families ? it is quite a shame that those people who claim this is a good idea justify it be try to exagarate the negative extremes on bad parenting by hetrosexual people rather than talking about any benefit of allowing this to happen, is it a good idea or just better than the extreme you are highlighting ? as i said before the cases and extremes you are quoting would not get accpeted to be adoptive parents anyway.
alibob Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 As usual missus c talks sense. Just because a bloke is gay it does not mean he fancies every male alive. Thats like saying a straight bloke is likely to fancy his daughter?? But thinking of the kid, they're gonna have a tough time of it as they're growing up at school. Kids are cruel and pick on anything, something like that could make someones life a misery.
Smiffs Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 everyone has a hobby and to be truthful, queers dont really worry me so long as i dont see it. but looking after kids isnt right, for the kids sake growing up where you see two blokes kissing and cuddling is wrong.
Gonk Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 everyone has a hobby and to be truthful, queers dont really worry me so long as i dont see it. but looking after kids isnt right, for the kids sake growing up where you see two blokes kissing and cuddling is wrong. Aye but think of the Cudos a young lad would have amongst his schoolmates if he could announce that his mothers are Lesbians. Tho other kids' Dads would probably want to join in on the sleepovers :p
Gonk Posted January 26, 2007 Posted January 26, 2007 TSO- you miss my point entirely.I am pointing out that its not openly homosexual men that are a danger to our children. Whilst i am by no means saying that closet gays are all peados , i am saying that the closet ones pose more of a threat than the openly gay ones, because people assume they are safer. ignorance may be bliss- but its also feckin dangerous. Do you two talk to each other, or just communicate via the keyboard. Just wonderin' like
no balls Posted January 27, 2007 Posted January 27, 2007 every comparison you are making in defence of this is comparing being parented by a same sex couple who are the height of respectability and then someone off the catherine tate show.if there are enough properly vetted hetrosexual couples who want to adopt should gays still be allowed to ? should adoption agencies that disagree with this be forced to accept gay couples ? has any research been done on the impact of being adopted by single sex families ? it is quite a shame that those people who claim this is a good idea justify it be try to exagarate the negative extremes on bad parenting by hetrosexual people rather than talking about any benefit of allowing this to happen, is it a good idea or just better than the extreme you are highlighting ? as i said before the cases and extremes you are quoting would not get accpeted to be adoptive parents anyway. I am not trying to justify it by exagerating negative extremes. mainly because in today's society, unfortunately they seem to be less extreme. The justification is that in reality the older children do not appear to be wanted by many of these straight couples and so if a gay couple are happy to take in what are seen as 'not easily homed', then I for one would welcome it. And I think I did point out in an earlier post that all children deserve a loving home whether their parents be rich poor, straight or gay, that is surely justification. I very much doubt gay parents will ever get president over 'normal' couples but I'm sure and would hope, adoption agencies will vet gay couples in the same way as they would straight ones and in some cases, single parents.
Casino Posted January 27, 2007 Posted January 27, 2007 some seriously fcuked up individuals use this board
Traf Posted January 27, 2007 Posted January 27, 2007 some seriously fcuked up individuals use this board How long did it take you to come to that conclusion? PS I still say that prospective parents' sexuality shouldn't affect their suitability to adopt.
Casino Posted January 27, 2007 Posted January 27, 2007 PS I still say that prospective parents' sexuality shouldn't affect their suitability to adopt.
no balls Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 PS I still say that prospective parents' sexuality shouldn't affect their suitability to adopt. Well that's 4 of us then. Me, Missus C, Casino & Traf. Happen we should set up a rival party to Jay's. Bagsy I be Chancellor.
Recommended Posts