Sweep Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 Well that's 4 of us then. Me, Missus C, Casino & Traf. Happen we should set up a rival party to Jay's. Bagsy I be Chief Whip.
Guest The Special One Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 How long did it take you to come to that conclusion? PS I still say that prospective parents' sexuality shouldn't affect their suitability to adopt. FFS Traf, are you and cassie a pair of arse bandits trying to adopt kids?
no balls Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 FFS Traf, are you and cassie a pair of arse bandits trying to adopt kids? Maybe they're just not homophobic. There's a thought.
Guest The Special One Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 Maybe they're just not homophobic. There's a thought. just abnormal as I said, if God wanted a pair of queers to have kids, he would of given them the tools to do it naturally. What well happen to the poor kids when his parents die of Aids because we all know queers are more promiscuous and are at a higher risk to the disease
no balls Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 What well happen to the poor kids when his parents die of Aids because we all know queers are more promiscuous and are at a higher risk to the disease Or cancer, or heart disease or being run over by a bus as we all know working class people smoke more, have a higher fat diet and are less likely to have a car than middle class folk.
Whites man Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 Or cancer, or heart disease or being run over by a bus as we all know working class people smoke more, have a higher fat diet and are less likely to have a car than middle class folk. Who said the adopted parents had to be working class?
no balls Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 Who said the adopted parents had to be working class? Just raising the point folk die.
bolty58 Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 I'm with Jay. Two queer blokes should only be allowed to adopt kids if they pass the 20 minute flamethrower test. Even if they ain't kiddy fiddlers, the kid would be likely to grow up with a seriously distorted view of the world. As I have said before, all this social engineering with unnatural practices and the like can only end in disaster.
Casino Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 (edited) i think theres a wider debate to be had here and thats to consider whether 'normal' folk should be allowed to have kids without first being approved as suitable (that might be getting a bit too close to 30s germany, though) til then, i don't give a shit about the sexuality of the parents, so long as the kids are safe and cared for Edited January 28, 2007 by Casino
Burndens Bogs Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 (edited) Well that's 4 of us then. Me, Missus C, Casino & Traf. Happen we should set up a rival party to Jay's. Bagsy I be Chancellor. You could call it the "we've got friends who are gay, and want to adopt" party You wouldn't get my vote - sorry. This countries going fcukin mental, and these trendy "right on" liberal views are a prime reason. Edited January 28, 2007 by Burndens Bogs
Guest The Special One Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 Or cancer, or heart disease or being run over by a bus as we all know working class people smoke more, have a higher fat diet and are less likely to have a car than middle class folk. I said Aids, no other illness, because Aids is rife amongst the homosexual community
no balls Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 I said Aids, no other illness, because Aids is rife amongst the homosexual community Just saying parents do die irrelevant of their sexuality. I reckon you've been fed far too many stereotypes. I doubt promiscous types, whether they be straight or gay, would or should be able to adopt.
Guest The Special One Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 Well I still say its not morally or naturally right for queers to parent children..........end f??ckin of
no balls Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 Well I still say its not morally or naturally right for queers to parent children..........end f??ckin of IYHO. We'll agree to disagree on that one.
Sweep Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 i think theres a wider debate to be had here and thats to consider whether 'normal' folk should be allowed to have kids without first being approved as suitable (that might be getting a bit too close to 30s germany, though) til then, i don't give a shit about the sexuality of the parents, so long as the kids are safe and cared for I agree, women should be sterlized at birth, only once they can prove to the state that they are capable of looking after not only themselves, but also a child, then the operation can be reveresed. It sounds a radical idea, but think of the benefits for the country as a whole, for a start taxes could be lowered, as the amount of benefits to be paid would drop hugely.
Smiffs Posted January 28, 2007 Posted January 28, 2007 i think theres a wider debate to be had here and thats to consider whether 'normal' folk should be allowed to have kids without first being approved as suitable (that might be getting a bit too close to 30s germany, though) There's f??ck all wrong with that idea. As my Nan used to say, 'you once needed a licence to own a dog but any old junkie slag can have kids' or words to that effect. Screening would be parents for their suitablility will go a long way to reducing the ever increasing proportion of social degenerates we have in society today. And while I'm at it, why not round up all registered nonces, thieves, and junkie Aids victims, and throw them to the chambers. They're fit for f??ck all to man nor beast.
Bea Smith Posted January 29, 2007 Posted January 29, 2007 I do agree that gay/lesbian parents should be given the right to adopt. However, i still think that a male and female parent would be more suitable. I simply think that there are more children needing adoption than there are male and female couples willing to adopt. Male and female couples are also more likely to want a younger child. I am aware of the pressures children may be under at school/socially by their peers if their prospective parents are gay. But i ask you this- if the gay prospective parents are willing to take in a child, provide a secure home, give up their time,money etc to care for a child, have passed all police checks, are not going to hump on the couch while the kids watching fireman sam, are going to provide a balanced view of life, are going to make education and health a priority etc, and the child is fed up of care homes, foster homes, no stability etc. THEN WHO THE FECK ARE YOU TO TELL THAT CHILD THEY CANT BE ADOPTED BY A GAY COUPLE.? P.S- what makes you think that all gay adoptive parents would prance round to the school gates in pink rubber suits shouting 'chase me' in the playground??
bolty58 Posted January 29, 2007 Posted January 29, 2007 I do agree that gay/lesbian parents should be given the right to adopt. However, i still think that a male and female parent would be more suitable. I simply think that there are more children needing adoption than there are male and female couples willing to adopt. Male and female couples are also more likely to want a younger child. I am aware of the pressures children may be under at school/socially by their peers if their prospective parents are gay. But i ask you this- if the gay prospective parents are willing to take in a child, provide a secure home, give up their time,money etc to care for a child, have passed all police checks, are not going to hump on the couch while the kids watching fireman sam, are going to provide a balanced view of life, are going to make education and health a priority etc, and the child is fed up of care homes, foster homes, no stability etc.THEN WHO THE FECK ARE YOU TO TELL THAT CHILD THEY CANT BE ADOPTED BY A GAY COUPLE.? P.S- what makes you think that all gay adoptive parents would prance round to the school gates in pink rubber suits shouting 'chase me' in the playground?? No end to this argument. A matter of opinion. It just so happens that TSO, Smiffs, BGOE, Burndens Bogs, me etc. are reet and the rest of you are summat else. Simple question - would a couple of coco shunters bringing up an adopted lad steer him towards a sordid homosexual lifestyle or a natural and wonderful heterosexual lifestyle? I can already hear the liberal hand wringers tapping the keys to say 'neither, let the kid decide himself'. Boll0cks. That means the sordid route and you all know it. Get the flamethrowers out.
Burndens Bogs Posted January 29, 2007 Posted January 29, 2007 WHO THE FECK ARE YOU TO TELL THAT CHILD THEY CANT BE ADOPTED BY A GAY COUPLE.? Kinell, Missus C coming over all liberal I find it hard to believe that gays have any "natural" maternal instincts, the cynic in me just says that an adopted child is more of a gay couples latest fashion accesory - this seasons "must have" item. What happens to the poor kid when it's not the "in thing" anymore, you can't just discard the child like an unwanted man bag.
Ani Posted January 29, 2007 Posted January 29, 2007 I do agree that gay/lesbian parents should be given the right to adopt. However, i still think that a male and female parent would be more suitable. I simply think that there are more children needing adoption than there are male and female couples willing to adopt. Male and female couples are also more likely to want a younger child. I am aware of the pressures children may be under at school/socially by their peers if their prospective parents are gay. But i ask you this- if the gay prospective parents are willing to take in a child, provide a secure home, give up their time,money etc to care for a child, have passed all police checks, are not going to hump on the couch while the kids watching fireman sam, are going to provide a balanced view of life, are going to make education and health a priority etc, and the child is fed up of care homes, foster homes, no stability etc.THEN WHO THE FECK ARE YOU TO TELL THAT CHILD THEY CANT BE ADOPTED BY A GAY COUPLE.? P.S- what makes you think that all gay adoptive parents would prance round to the school gates in pink rubber suits shouting 'chase me' in the playground?? missus c and who are you to say that the kid has to be adopted by a gay couple. my point about all this and no one who is pro this change will answer is 1. is there any research to show the long term effect on this on the adopted kids ? 2. Is this change being bought in for the benefit of children or because political pressure says that gays have to have this right ? In mrs c post above all i read is how much the 'parents' want a kid, how about what the kid wants/needs ?
Widnes Two Hats Posted January 29, 2007 Posted January 29, 2007 There is no such thing as homosexuality, it's just laziness And if these people can't be arsed chatting up a member of the opposite sex then why should they be entrusted with children's welfare Spermy shit tests should be made compulsive to all male adopters and positive results must lead to their immediate arrest from the botty police (obviously women will have special diplomatic immunity from such prosecutions) Problem resolved
jules_darby Posted January 29, 2007 Posted January 29, 2007 There is no such thing as homosexuality, it's just laziness
Sweep Posted January 29, 2007 Posted January 29, 2007 There is no such thing as homosexuality, it's just laziness Kind of "taking the path of least resistance"
Bea Smith Posted January 29, 2007 Posted January 29, 2007 missus c and who are you to say that the kid has to be adopted by a gay couple. I havn't said that Ani because that isnt my view, im saying the option should be there for children to take a home with gay parents rather than none at all. I have already stated that i think straight male/female parents would be a better option. Incidentally- no child is adopted against their will these days. Im not saying every unadopted child should be packed off to a gay couple like theyre a designer t shirt. I just feel that these children should have as many options as possible in the mine field of finding parents. My opinions are based on choice for the children seeking a home- not about sticking up for gay men. The only comment i have made to stick up for gay men is to say that being gay is not the same as being a peodophile. Thats just common feckin sense that seems to evade some people on here. I certainly do not think that adoption agencies should be in a situation where they let a gay couple adopt over a straight couple just because they dont want to appear discriminate or fill their % quota of gay adopotions. That is certainly the wrong path to go down. the childs interest should always be taking into account over any prospective parents wether they are straight / gay/ black/ white. Should a black child be adopted by a white family? Should a chinese child be adopted by a russian? Another thing that needs tackling are the restrictions on older people adopting. They're ideal to take in older kids, why stop it happening if the adults and child are willing??
Recommended Posts