Guest as Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 I'm allergic to cats & dogs....I agree with the muslims...they're filthy animals However, my tortoise is the bees knees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiffs Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 In fairness the vast majority of muslims wont care a bollocks about it and will be embarrassed at the hoo-haa. Same with most of the things that cause us honkeys to get pissed off. Its the PC bedwetters, created by the Nanny State (sponsored by the commies and the reds), and a tiny majority of f?ckwit Muslims who are creating these situations. Until they are told to sort their heads out, and bascially crawl back from whatever f?ckin stone they came from, there will always be a daily amount of ammo for the tabloids to feed on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wovlad Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 In fairness the vast majority of muslims wont care a bollocks about it and will be embarrassed at the hoo-haa. Same with most of the things that cause us honkeys to get pissed off. Its the PC bedwetters, created by the Nanny State (sponsored by the commies and the reds), and a tiny majority of f?ckwit Muslims who are creating these situations. Until they are told to sort their heads out, and bascially crawl back from whatever f?ckin stone they came from, there will always be a daily amount of ammo for the tabloids to feed on. Sounds like the PC brigade are taking over. Its the wearing of the Burkha, veil, that really upsets me, a garment of choice not religion. Its not written in the Koran otherwise all Muslim women would have to have wear it. Yet people can wear them on Public transport, when they enter banks etc its just plain wrong. What If Jedi, as In star wars gets recognised as a relgion, yes there are people out there who do want it classed as a religion, would that mean you could walk around with a stormtroopers helmet on & class it as an article of faith, I doubt it but you never know. However one way to look a it is this in Ancient times what type of women wore veils?. Here's a clue you found them in Hareems On the plus side there were a few muslims having ale in the The Tavern on Hunger Hill a week or so ago. Sounds like the start of a joke that. Fair play to them, no better place to integrate yourself than a pub even if it is forbidden by there religion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burndens Bogs Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 (edited) Its the wearing of the Burkha, veil, that really upsets me, a garment of choice not religion. Its not written in the Koran otherwise all Muslim women would have to have wear it. Yet people can wear them on Public transport, when they enter banks etc its just plain wrong. Me too,i find it offensive. The wearing of the Burkha seems to have increased since 9/11 Edited July 4, 2008 by Burndens Bogs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggie Tate Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Me too,it offends me. Funny how the wearing of the Burkha has increased since 9/11 I'd love to see the supporting evidence. It's very much more likely to be the case, in fact, that such issues have gained more presidence since 9/11, so you notice them more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burndens Bogs Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 I'd love to see the supporting evidence. It's very much more likely to be the case, in fact, that such issues have gained more presidence since 9/11, so you notice them more. Well i don't recall seeing as many 10 years ago, maybe it's just a fashion thing eh?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Zico Posted July 4, 2008 Moderators Share Posted July 4, 2008 Well i don't recall seeing as many 10 years ago, maybe it's just a fashion thing eh?. don't think that's anything to do with 9/11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no balls Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Me too,i find it offensive. It annoys me when I see them driving with one on. How the f?ck do they have full peripheral vision when they have a strip of fabric across their face with a slit in it? Wimmin can be shit drivers anyway BUT surely that'll make it worse. I tend to glare at them as a form of defence because frankly, I haven't a clue what facial expression they're pulling when looking at me. If it is their choice and not their huband's, then they are sad, lazy individuals with no respect for themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burndens Bogs Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 If it is their choice and not their huband's, then they are sad, lazy individuals with no respect for themselves. And if it's their husbands choice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no balls Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 And if it's their husbands choice? Then they're even sadder with even less respect for themselves. I work with a muslim girl who's quite religious & married with kids. She covers her hair BUT wears well coordinated, dresses/trousers with scarfs to match, sometimes in bright colours & she actually looks really nice and like many western girls, the only difference is covering her hair. I've never got into a conversation with her about it but I really don't understand why she can dress like that but other folk of the same religion can look like the grim reaper. Is it to do with what sect you're from(or am I just talking shiite*)? *see what I did there, Whites man? :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayjayoghani Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Well I think it's certainly increased since I was a nipper. If I noticed that red dot on the forehead of a lot of Asian women, sure I would have noticed a load of ninjas knocking around Bolton. The red dot isn't fashionable now either? I seem to have lapsed into Alf Garnett mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Well I think it's certainly increased since I was a nipper. If I noticed that red dot on the forehead of a lot of Asian women, sure I would have noticed a load of ninjas knocking around Bolton. The red dot isn't fashionable now either? I seem to have lapsed into Alf Garnett mode. Red dot - Hindu Veil- Muslim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no balls Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Veil- Muslim I think JJ's quite aware of the difference. Point is Frank, is the veil neccesary or is it a statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revdishydave Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Sounds like the PC brigade are taking over. Its the wearing of the Burkha, veil, that really upsets me, a garment of choice not religion. Its not written in the Koran otherwise all Muslim women would have to have wear it. Yet people can wear them on Public transport, when they enter banks etc its just plain wrong. What If Jedi, as In star wars gets recognised as a relgion, yes there are people out there who do want it classed as a religion, would that mean you could walk around with a stormtroopers helmet on & class it as an article of faith, I doubt it but you never know. . not really, in fact quite the opposite. stormtroopers, although originally designed to serve the senate, when emperor siezed power, the jedi were forced into hiding. most were assasinated by imperial stormtroopers. hardly likely to promote the fact. a bit like jesus dressing as a roman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyRiddle Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 This may well be a SEB but I don't care as it is pi$$ funny. When all this Muslim PC bollocks starts to get on your tit$ watch this, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouDRDzqTu0M "Silence - I kill You" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyRiddle Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 (edited) And this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsXglA5xTi0...feature=related Edited July 4, 2008 by JimmyRiddle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted July 4, 2008 Moderators Share Posted July 4, 2008 It annoys me when I see them driving with one on. How the f?ck do they have full peripheral vision when they have a strip of fabric across their face with a slit in it? Wimmin can be shit drivers anyway BUT surely that'll make it worse. I tend to glare at them as a form of defence because frankly, I haven't a clue what facial expression they're pulling when looking at me. If it is their choice and not their huband's, then they are sad, lazy individuals with no respect for themselves. how so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted July 4, 2008 Moderators Share Posted July 4, 2008 (edited) Sounds like the PC brigade are taking over. Its the wearing of the Burkha, veil, that really upsets me, a garment of choice not religion. Its not written in the Koran otherwise all Muslim women would have to have wear it. Yet people can wear them on Public transport, when they enter banks etc its just plain wrong. What If Jedi, as In star wars gets recognised as a relgion, yes there are people out there who do want it classed as a religion, would that mean you could walk around with a stormtroopers helmet on & class it as an article of faith, I doubt it but you never know. However one way to look a it is this in Ancient times what type of women wore veils?. Here's a clue you found them in Hareems On the plus side there were a few muslims having ale in the The Tavern on Hunger Hill a week or so ago. Sounds like the start of a joke that. Fair play to them, no better place to integrate yourself than a pub even if it is forbidden by there religion. why what the fcuk has it got to do with you two faced bastards abound on this thread (imo) 'who the fcuk are they to tell us what to do' then 'they shouldn't wear this n that' well look, tis time to open your eyes they can wear whatsoever they like (in normal day to day life) and have as much right to do so as anybody else to be honest it should be actively encouraged, nay mandatory, for all gingers to cover up Edited July 4, 2008 by Casino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 I think JJ's quite aware of the difference. Point is Frank, is the veil neccesary or is it a statement? i'd say it depends on your interpretation of the Koran. is it a statement when a jewish fella wears a hat with the curly sids, or is it a part of his religious views Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exiledwhite2 Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 why what the fcuk has it got to do with you two faced bastards abound on this thread (imo) 'who the fcuk are they to tell us what to do' then 'they shouldn't wear this n that' well look, tis time to open your eyes they can wear whatsoever they like (in normal day to day life) and have as much right to do so as anybody else to be honest it should be actively encouraged, nay mandatory, for all gingers to cover up I disagree with what it represents to be honest. It's a symbol of the oppression of women. These liberties we afford minorities often seem to represent liberties they are denying to other people. That's the circle you can't square. I don't buy 'it's their choice' either. You really think women would, without influence, choose to dress like that? I don't. I don't believe it has a place in this country either. We're better than that. And when rules have to be bent in common sense situations - i.e. teaching, going through security - it's a total farce. It is plain to see that we've lurched WAYYYY too far with all this nonsense. Even if 99% of the stories are just sensationalist claptrap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyRiddle Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 they can wear whatsoever they like (in normal day to day life) and have as much right to do so as anybody else Which is a great sentiment except for when it transcends the rules, customs and laws of this country. Can a teacher, policeman, doctor really carry out their duties with their face covered? Should you be allowed to anonamise yourself in banks, airports, passport office? So while I find it odd that in a free country women feel the need to oppress themselves, the real sore point is when the PC brigade stop us managing this country correctly because someone chooses to cover there face. Could you or I do it, no, then neither should anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted July 4, 2008 Moderators Share Posted July 4, 2008 I disagree with what it represents to be honest. It's a symbol of the oppression of women. These liberties we afford minorities often seem to represent liberties they are denying to other people. That's the circle you can't square. I don't buy 'it's their choice' either. You really think women would, without influence, choose to dress like that? I don't. I don't believe it has a place in this country either. We're better than that. And when rules have to be bent in common sense situations - i.e. teaching, going through security - it's a total farce. It is plain to see that we've lurched WAYYYY too far with all this nonsense. Even if 99% of the stories are just sensationalist claptrap. that isn't acceptable, think i agreed as much up above some women do want to cover up why, i don't know, but they want to do it who are we to say they shouldn't and if it is their husbands choice, again, whats it got to do with me or you theres things 'precious' to most religions i find rather odd each to their own i don't think we should be making folk accept our codes we're better than that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted July 4, 2008 Moderators Share Posted July 4, 2008 Which is a great sentiment except for when it transcends the rules, customs and laws of this country. Can a teacher, policeman, doctor really carry out their duties with their face covered? Should you be allowed to anonamise yourself in banks, airports, passport office? So while I find it odd that in a free country women feel the need to oppress themselves, the real sore point is when the PC brigade stop us managing this country correctly because someone chooses to cover there face. Could you or I do it, no, then neither should anyone else. one, i'll give you laws, customs i don't give a shiny one about two - i did say 'normal life' my intention was to exclude from 'normal' stuff like doctoring, patienting, teaching etc you know the stuff as its the stuff you are getting at finally, if thats the case and note some right of centre bollocks, we agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
globaldiver Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Red dot - Hindu Veil- Muslim can't blame em, really; as men can't whether they are babes or not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_spencer Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Which is a great sentiment except for when it transcends the rules, customs and laws of this country. Can a teacher, policeman, doctor really carry out their duties with their face covered? Should you be allowed to anonamise yourself in banks, airports, passport office? So while I find it odd that in a free country women feel the need to oppress themselves, the real sore point is when the PC brigade stop us managing this country correctly because someone chooses to cover there face. Could you or I do it, no, then neither should anyone else. any wimmin wearing the veil go througha special women only security gate in a separate room away from the eyes of men Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts