Guest bwfcdan Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 (edited) Cahill's left one tin-pot defence for another. Bloody awful defending. Edited February 21, 2012 by bwfcdan Quote
Sweep Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 I can see Chelsea getting tonked now, let's hope a couple of them get injured in this next half Quote
anewman Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 if we dont beat them satdy then we deserve to go down Quote
Ben Der Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Chelsea are awful at the back...If we can get in behind them down the flanks i think Saturday could be interesting Quote
burndenpaddock Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Time to unleash sordell, that defence looks terrified of pace Quote
Bono Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Did anyone know one of the Napoli players worked for Park cakes . Quote
gonzo Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 decent game a bloomfield too.... Â 2-1 bolt-ham,green just sent off. Â (didnt think it was worthy of a new thread) Â and yes that physio bird will be that full of spunk by tea time friday,she will be scarred to sneeze. Quote
no balls Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Did anyone know one of the Napoli players worked for Park cakes . Â That joke has been done further up the thread. Quote
stevieb Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Blerim on. Â 3 ex whites ont pitch in a cl match. Is that a record? Quote
birch-chorley Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 They are that poor that I think we should go with a 442 and have two strikers running them ragid! Quote
MalcolmW Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 decent game a bloomfield too.... Â 2-1 bolt-ham,green just sent off. Â and West Ham haven't got a sub goalie - an old Allardyce ploy (Bo Hansen??). Quote
Bono Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Â Â That joke has been done further up the thread. Quote
Casino Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 They are that poor that I think we should go with a 442 and have two strikers running them ragid! Â fcuk off, owen Quote
HomerJay Posted February 21, 2012 Author Posted February 21, 2012 How bad is ivanovic? Â I hope this back 4 play against us. Â They are not a defensive unit in any way, shape or form Quote
Danny G Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 How bad is ivanovic?  I hope this back 4 play against us.  They are not a defensive unit in any way, shape or form  I think Luiz has a touch of Campo about him, Quote
superjohnmcginlay Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 vaz te pops one in.... Â hes on plenty of fish too? Quote
Bono Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Neville is a good pundit. They're arn't many. Quote
no balls Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Neville is a good pundit. They're arn't many. Â I felt a bit grubby reading that. Quote
little whitt Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 They are that poor that I think we should go with a 442 and have two strikers running them ragid! do we have 2 strikers who can run them ragid Quote
DomRepWanderer Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 Well they will be without Terry for 2 months, so stranger things than a Bolton win have happened. Quote
HomerJay Posted February 21, 2012 Author Posted February 21, 2012 Neville is a good pundit. They're arn't many. Â He says reasonable things but every sentence is in the same fucking tone. Quote
DazBob Posted February 21, 2012 Posted February 21, 2012 If AVB plays that same midfield on Saturday we've got a chance. I just hope Coyle hasn't watched that tonight and thought playing 442 is a good idea. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.