Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, miamiwhite said:

You're sounding more like a Jock every day now Jimmy 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿😘

😂✌️

Posted
2 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

When we have food shortages,  you can change the words up there to :

The shelves are bare now.....😄

I can’t wait to be in my kilt in Trafalgar Square in the summer 😁

Posted
Just now, Tonge moor green jacket said:

I'm surprised you haven't already!🤣 

WW champion shagger.

Haha. I do know Someone that has albeit a long long time ago 

Posted
31 minutes ago, DazBob said:

You don't even need to travel.

Where I used to work in Blackburn there was a high percentage of staff who only needed to utilise a bottle of water and their left hand.  Disgusting.

Former student I used to work with was Indian originally and lived in Tanzania. 

Cracking bloke but admitted that when he first came he was astonished to see no water pipe or similar to use with his hand for cleaning. Said he felt dirty using bog roll and had a shower post dump for ages until he got used to it.

Animal!

Posted
12 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

I can’t wait to be in my kilt in Trafalgar Square in the summer 😁

And like a typical Jock, you'll not go home for ten years 😆 

Posted
1 minute ago, miamiwhite said:

And like a typical Jock, you'll not go home for ten years 😆 

I did that in reverse up here remember. Came up for 2 years 14 years ago 😁

Posted
3 hours ago, Spider said:

As a one time, lazy scholar of 1984, the concept of Doublethink has been a feature of the last few years.

There's a part in the book where an official is denouncing the enemy in a public speech, and halfway through changes the enemy to someone else. (Eastasia to Eurasia, ironically)

The crowd instantly lap it up. They know the enemy has changed, but they don't care and just hate the new enemy instead.

It's not one of Orwell's most subtle metaphors, but it demonstrates the point beautifully that if you want to believe something badly enough, your brain simply allows it to happen and convinces you it's correct

A wonderful irony in that.

Twice over in fact.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

I did that in reverse up here remember. Came up for 2 years 14 years ago 😁

They'll boot you out next year if Wee Nippy has her way then builds the wall again.

Posted
3 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

They'll boot you out next year if Wee Nippy has her way then builds the wall again.

Aye she won’t want cross breeding even from thoroughbred stock such as my good self 

Posted

"Project Fear!"

"Brexit means Brexit!"

"We won, you lost - get over it!"

"Boris's Deal is Oven-Ready!"

"Just get Brexit done!"

"No Deal is better than a bad deal!"

"Let's go WTO!"

.....

"It's all the Remainers fault!"

Posted
4 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Might not be quite so easy to fill that in at the end. The very first one might tick both yes and no.

Hmm

One point I haen't heard made; that if we give up something (fishing, for example), we are giving it up as a sovereign nation making a decision.

Too nuanced for the media; Boris will either "win" or "lose" (or both)

Posted
Just now, Cheese said:

You do post a lot of links to websites whose url contains the word "brexit". It generally means they're not entirely trustworthy, or they're data farming.

Thanks; here's hoping my protection is sufficiently strong!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, boltondiver said:

Hmm

One point I haen't heard made; that if we give up something (fishing, for example), we are giving it up as a sovereign nation making a decision.

Too nuanced for the media; Boris will either "win" or "lose" (or both)

Absolutely. 

The decision whether to allow others to fish in UK waters is one that will be made from a financial and environmental perspective. Of course if French boats are allowed to fish for example, that's the choice made by the government. It isnt giving up sovereignty but using it.

Just as changing the immigration policy isn't giving up anything. 

I saw an interview earlier with a fella who's name I can't remember. He was very good and explained how he felt movement on the level playing field was achievable- utilising a non regression policy to prevent either side dropping standards as it seems is in their canada deal.

Hillary Benn also spoke well: talked about how having to stick to each others standards per se has the potential for problems in that one side could raise theirs in one area and try to claim the other then has a commercial advantage. Which would be perverse. Again a non regression agreement seems sensible.

 

Edited by Tonge moor green jacket
Hilary autochanged to hilarious!
Posted

“Give me your dinner money you little shit”

”oK, but I want you to know that I’m doing it for my own reasons, not because you’ve backed me into a corner”

Posted
5 minutes ago, Spider said:

“Give me your dinner money you little shit”

”oK, but I want you to know that I’m doing it for my own reasons, not because you’ve backed me into a corner”

Boris loses

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

A sovereign loss gaining lots of money from EU boats paying for rights. Keep em coming. 

Cod for questions scandal on the way.

Oh are they paying?

My mistake then 😊

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.