Politics

[Not in Crawley]

10 minutes ago, little whitt said:

is that what it is now 

think when mine where young 

it was £12 and £10 i think  

 

Yeah - I used to get mine as pocket money so I knew it was £12

[PatrickBateman]

On 17/07/2024 at 22:28, mickbrown said:

My brother is younger than me. Although he wouldn’t be seen dead with that barnet even in 2001. 😁

Love ya really, yer big Halliwell love sponge 😎

[PatrickBateman]

13 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Yeah as I say I wasn't looking but the CSA says it makes the payments easier as it proves she is actually living with me and their system talks to that one

I thought you were a rich kid?

Ask that bank of mum & dad for some dosh.

[Cheese]

22 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I'm not pissed off at them. I'm just saying how it is.

It's the monster our government has created.

You were the one ignoring what Mounts was saying and bringing up normal working people using state schools.

You wouldn't know real life if it bit you on the arse.

You completely missed the point I was making. Never mind. Carry on blaming scutters for everything.

[Sweep]

2 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Davy Jones' locker?

You little monkee 🙂

[gonzo]

11 minutes ago, Cheese said:

You completely missed the point I was making. Never mind. Carry on blaming scutters for everything.

I've not once blamed the scutters.

If its on a plate, folk will take it.

Same reason people trek over land and sea to get here.

 

[PatrickBateman]

6 hours ago, bwfcfan5 said:

There will always be backbench demands. We’ve had 14 years of rabid and extremist right wing backbenchers holding the whole country to ransom as the Tory party was too weak to ignore them and we’ve suffered hugely as a result.

Cranks like Braverman who in past times would have been hidden from view given ministerial roles to try and hold their party together. And we’ve all suffered for it.

Now Labour can simply ignore their backbenchers for a while. And given Braverman raised the issue on lifting the cap in Parliament why are you suggesting this is a left wing thing. It seems to be something the Tories brought in that the far right want rid of. 

'14 years of rabid and extremist'

Fcking hell, you're either the greatest troll on ww or a complete mongalong 😅😅

The Tories allowed an asylum-invasion, taxes through the roof and gave free money to people on Universal Credit and that's right-wing??

Again, we have one party, Starmer is Rishi minus the tan, they're the same thing ffs.

[Cheese]

1 minute ago, PatrickBateman said:

'14 years of rabid and extremist'

Fcking hell, you're either the greatest troll on ww or a complete mongalong 😅😅

The Tories allowed an asylum-invasion, taxes through the roof and gave free money to people on Universal Credit and that's right-wing??

Again, we have one party, Starmer is Rishi minus the tan, they're the same thing ffs.

What do you think they should have done?

[PatrickBateman]

1 minute ago, gonzo said:

I've not once blamed the scutters.

If its on a plate, folk will take it.

Same reason people trek over land and sea to get here.

 

Most of them end up in Deane 😁

Walked through the town centre after getting back from Manchester, it was 80% refugees and 20% white smackheads milling about.

Grim.

[Not in Crawley]

17 minutes ago, PatrickBateman said:

I thought you were a rich kid?

Ask that bank of mum & dad for some dosh.

Yeah, good idea that. Retired teachers are generally in the Elon Musk catagory of financial wealth.

[London Wanderer]

“minus the tan” ?

And who’s the mongalong again ? 

[Mounts Kipper]

20 minutes ago, Cheese said:

You completely missed the point I was making. Never mind. Carry on blaming scutters for everything.

Your point is the problem lies with rich getting richer, presuming referring to  tax loopholes for high earners and large corporate companies, so let’s just overlook spongers having 5 kids, not working and claiming benefits, as I said your stated  postion is thick as fuck, it’s let the middle earners foot the bills and get hammered for tax because some fucker wants to be paid to have 5 kids. And you support this bollocks. 

Edited July 23, 2024 by Mounts Kipper

[PatrickBateman]

Just now, Cheese said:

What do you think they should have done?

Well they're called the Conservative party, the clue is in the name really.

I don't think leaving the borders wide-open helped working folk here, do you? If I go to my local doctors then it's wall-to-wall unemployed Somalians, they're contributing fck all.

As for someone who hasn't 'yet' fled central Bolton all I can say is we've invited the world in and it's worse than it ever was. 

Don't get me started on the local bagheads, I feel like Travis Bickle, praying for a rain to wash this scum off the streets.

[PatrickBateman]

3 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Yeah, good idea that. Retired teachers are generally in the Elon Musk catagory of financial wealth.

My Violin is playing a tune for you 🎻 

[PatrickBateman]

4 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

“minus the tan” ?

And who’s the mongalong again ? 

You and your chums call people Gammon on here, don't cry 😢 

[Not in Crawley]

Just now, PatrickBateman said:

My Violin is playing a tune for you 🎻 

Can I request The Lark Ascending please?

[Cheese]

14 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

Your point is the rich getting richer, presuming referring to  tax loopholes for high earners and large corporate companies, so let’s just overlook spongers having 5 kids, not working and claiming benefits, as I said your stated  postion is thick as fuck, it’s let the middle earners foot the bills and get hammered for tax because some fucker wants to be paid to have 5 kids. 

No, my point is - you're happy for people who don't even have kids to pay for YOUR kids' education, but you don't want to pay for other peoples' kids to have a decent start in life.

Edited July 23, 2024 by Cheese

[Mounts Kipper]

2 minutes ago, Cheese said:

No, my point is - you're happy for people who don't even have kids to pay for YOUR kids' education, but you don't want to pay for other people kids to have a decent start in life.

 Nope I’m happy to pay for 2 kids to be supported seems you’re happy to have unlimited number supported.  Brains of a rocking horse you lad. 

Edited July 23, 2024 by Mounts Kipper

[PatrickBateman]

3 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Can I request The Lark Ascending please?

Posh cunt.

I was thinking The Flintstones theme tune.

[Spider]

Just now, PatrickBateman said:

Posh cunt.

I was thinking The Flintstones theme tune.

Did you know people in Dubai don’t like the Flintsones, but the people in Abu Dhabi Doo?

[Casino]

1 minute ago, Cheese said:

No, my point is - you're happy for people who don't even have kids to pay for YOUR kids' education, but you don't want to pay for other people kids to have a decent start in life.

And thats why this is so fucking difficult

And its why additional benefits shouldnt be going on dark fruits and fags

Fuck the stigma of having to spend food vouchers, if thats what it takes, thats what it takes

Its about making the lives of the poor little fuckers a bit better

Much of the ire on here is aimed at the parents...the cap doesnt stop em having kids, so whats its purpose

Its clearly failing

 

Anyway, child poverty is a much bigger issue than simply removing the cap

[PatrickBateman]

2 minutes ago, Spider said:

Did you know people in Dubai don’t like the Flintsones, but the people in Abu Dhabi Doo?

Fucker, I LOL'd 😅

[Casino]

5 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

 Nope I’m happy to pay for 2 kids to be supported seems you’re happy to have unlimited number supported.  Brains of a rocking horse you lad. 

If we are going to be so simplistic, youre happy to have kids living in poverty

[Guest]

19 minutes ago, PatrickBateman said:

'14 years of rabid and extremist'

Fcking hell, you're either the greatest troll on ww or a complete mongalong 😅😅

The Tories allowed an asylum-invasion, taxes through the roof and gave free money to people on Universal Credit and that's right-wing??

Again, we have one party, Starmer is Rishi minus the tan, they're the same thing ffs.

Which version of the Tory party have this lot abandoned? If you ask the Tory front bench of the 80’s and 90’s they certainly wouldn’t be saying this lot were ‘too close to the centre’.

We’ve had austerity, Brexit, Truss and Tufton street mob and then Sunak who is probably of the 1980/90 Tory tradition but too weak to stand up to the idiots behind him who absolutely are not.

We are letting people in because primarily we need to. Because we cut off all our labour force and don’t have enough people domestically. 

[Cheese]

17 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said:

 Nope I’m happy to pay for 2 kids to be supported seems you’re happy to have unlimited number supported.  Brains of a rocking horse you lad. 

So if you had 3 kids, you'd have schooled the 3rd one Privately out of principle?