Spider Posted March 25 Posted March 25 6 minutes ago, royal white said: Utter woke nonsense. 😄   What about flatdicks, the gays and the slice'n'dice trannies? Quote
Ani Posted March 25 Posted March 25 2 hours ago, Sweep said: Starmer certainly avoids the question, and I think we'd all like to here some sort of answer, the one thing he is right about though is that it's almost impossible to take anything Farage says seriously these days. With regards to this "stop the boats" bollocks, I'd much rather somebody said "We can't stop them, they'll just keep coming" - as that's the long and short of it, they'll never ever be stopped. Pretty sure that the Reform will have decided to walk out before the answer , knowing that KS would not answer it. Certainly gets them back in the news rather than folk talking about Farage u turn on the war and being stuck up Trumps arse. Quote
jmjhb Posted March 25 Posted March 25 22 minutes ago, Spider said: What about flatdicks, the gays and the slice'n'dice trannies? FIFA have announced new measures for women’s football, mandating that teams must have at least one woman in a head coach or assistant coach role. The new regulations were approved this week by the FIFA Council, aiming to improve the representation of women in coaching roles in the long-term. From this year onwards, any team participating in FIFA women’s competitions must ensure that their head coach and/or at least one of the assistant coaches is female. Quote
DirtySanchez Posted March 25 Posted March 25 3 hours ago, royal white said: Does this clown ever attempt to answer a question?   PMQs has always been like that regardless of who is in charge Like a school playground and a complete waste of time Quote
Sweep Posted March 25 Posted March 25 29 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said: PMQs has always been like that regardless of who is in charge Like a school playground and a complete waste of time Indeed, it's time they got rid of it. It's just a pantomime these days. Quote
royal white Posted March 25 Posted March 25 1 hour ago, Sweep said: Indeed, it's time they got rid of it. It's just a pantomime these days. It seem more MPs are now picking up on it. Quote
Spider Posted March 25 Posted March 25 PMQ’s is just pointless now. I’ll credit Farage for once here - he knows this and is basically making a mockery of it whenever he gets chance. He may as well, it’s the only way any sort of change can occur. Its important to say that he’s still a quivering shitpile. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted March 25 Posted March 25 28 minutes ago, Spider said: PMQ’s is just pointless now. I’ll credit Farage for once here - he knows this and is basically making a mockery of it whenever he gets chance. He may as well, it’s the only way any sort of change can occur. Its important to say that he’s still a quivering shitpile. Its not. It is still valid. Look at most Western democracies - they dont have a chamber where once a week any elected representative can directly question the head of an elected state. It's a very, very important part of our government and needs to stay.  Quote
royal white Posted March 25 Posted March 25 21 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: Its not. It is still valid. Look at most Western democracies - they dont have a chamber where once a week any elected representative can directly question the head of an elected state. It's a very, very important part of our government and needs to stay.  It probably needs renaming then. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted March 25 Posted March 25 4 minutes ago, royal white said: It probably needs renaming then. Why? It started as a chamber questions in the late 1800s Quote
gonzo Posted March 25 Posted March 25 Â Â Like these two. They remind of them old boys that used to be on Rory Bremner. Â Â Quote
royal white Posted March 25 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: Why? It started as a chamber questions in the late 1800s Because he’s not answering questions, regardless of when it started. Quote
Jol_BWFC Posted March 25 Posted March 25 9 minutes ago, royal white said: Because he’s not answering questions, regardless of when it started. Maybe it’s just asking questions? Quote
Zico Posted March 25 Posted March 25 43 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: Its not. It is still valid. Look at most Western democracies - they dont have a chamber where once a week any elected representative can directly question the head of an elected state. It's a very, very important part of our government and needs to stay.  Yeah but what's the point of they don't directly answer the questions, or at least avoid most of them I watched this and it just comes across as rowdy and bawdy mud slinging and all a bit of a laugh that serves little purpose   Quote
royal white Posted March 25 Posted March 25 2 minutes ago, Jol_BWFC said: Maybe it’s just asking questions? Then he should just remain seated to save himself any further embarrassment. Quote
royal white Posted March 25 Posted March 25 2 minutes ago, Zico said: Yeah but what's the point of they don't directly answer the questions, or at least avoid most of them I watched this and it just comes across as rowdy and bawdy mud slinging and all a bit of a laugh that serves little purpose   She’s on @gonzo fisting videos Quote
Not in Crawley Posted March 25 Posted March 25 4 minutes ago, Zico said: Yeah but what's the point of they don't directly answer the questions, or at least avoid most of them I watched this and it just comes across as rowdy and bawdy mud slinging and all a bit of a laugh that serves little purpose   That isnt the point at all. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted March 25 Posted March 25 15 minutes ago, royal white said: Because he’s not answering questions, regardless of when it started. Look back - that isnt the bloody point, the simple fact you - as a normal person in the country feels that your PM hasnt directly answered questions is the whole point of it. You have seen it. That doesnt happen in the US or most other countries. Honestly, read a bit of history, it'd do you good. Quote
Zico Posted March 25 Posted March 25 4 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: That isnt the point at all. Aye, just seems like point scoring of some sort   Quote
royal white Posted March 25 Posted March 25 Just now, Not in Crawley said: Look back - that isnt the bloody point, the simple fact you - as a normal person in the country feels that your PM hasnt directly answered questions is the whole point of it. You have seen it. That doesnt happen in the US or most other countries. Honestly, read a bit of history, it'd do you good. Sorry, but I’m going to believe the multiple MPs from different sides who have called out the PM over the last few weeks for refusing to answer questions over some bloke on a footy forum. Quote
Winchester White Posted March 25 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, royal white said: Sorry, but I’m going to believe the multiple MPs from different sides who have called out the PM over the last few weeks for refusing to answer questions over some bloke on a footy forum. To be fair, you were shtum when Boris was doing it week after week after week. But I agree it's a load of bollocks that any PM can squirm out of uncomfortable questions so easily. Quote
royal white Posted March 25 Posted March 25 2 minutes ago, Winchester White said: To be fair, you were shtum when Boris was doing it week after week after week. But I agree it's a load of bollocks that any PM can squirm out of uncomfortable questions so easily. Was I, did he refuse to answer multiple questions at the time and did MPs from all other sides bring it up? Did you mention it?  We’ve moved on from Boris and no amount of whataboutery is bringing him back, Quote
Winchester White Posted March 25 Posted March 25 8 minutes ago, royal white said: Was I, did he refuse to answer multiple questions at the time and did MPs from all other sides bring it up? Did you mention it?  We’ve moved on from Boris and no amount of whataboutery is bringing him back, Yes, yes, yes and yes, several times. I did just state I agree it is bollocks whoever does it. Quote
royal white Posted March 25 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, Winchester White said: Yes, yes, yes and yes, several times. I did just state I agree it is bollocks whoever does it. I can’t remember, I’d need to read back, any idea what page it was on 😉 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.