6 coppers to take him down or 1 member of the public with his bike? 
 

 

 

4 hours ago, bolty58 said:

TBF to him, it was for a few hundred years. Hardly relevant mind. Bit like him.

To be even fairer to him, I have little doubt that a good conversation between he and I about the magnificence of BWFC could happen over pints in an off the beaten track pub somewhere in sunny Scotland.

On the extremely improbable chance that any of you ever walk in on this scenario at some future date, I'll be the one in a dormeuil tonik suit and he'll be the one in a bin liner gilet with a recycled turnip box on his head.

Another ridiculous decision by judges (I’m guessing British and white)

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/24/sex-offender-avoids-deportation-because-distrusts-authority/

20 hours ago, London Wanderer said:

Aye.
 

In all honesty, I knew you wouldn’t attempt to try. Wouldn’t be possible mate, because it’s pure drivel. What an odd world we live in where folk lap it all up.

 Night night x

 

change your username you bellend

 

you bring shame on the Cockney Whites Uber fan mega posse

1 hour ago, royal white said:

Another ridiculous decision by judges (I’m guessing British and white)

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/24/sex-offender-avoids-deportation-because-distrusts-authority/

They get more contrived every time I read these reasons for letting folk stay

23 minutes ago, Zico said:

They get more contrived every time I read these reasons for letting folk stay

You need thank the ECHR 😉

42 minutes ago, royal white said:

You need thank the ECHR 😉

I'm truly struggling to believe that the ECHR "laws" actually directly allow for such drivel, but that our judges (some of them) are simply taking the piss with their (politically) driven interpretations.

We've had the intention to amend our law to give judges more leeway on these interpretations and not be stuck to keeping them here, but that came to nowt. 

Not sure if it would have made any difference anyway, as they seem to just produce ever more ridiculous decisions. 

Now time to become far more stringent with our own laws, via ammendments or new legislation. Remove all mechanisms to produce these mind boggling outcomes.

Just can't see it happening with either red or blue.

 

1 hour ago, whiteboy said:

 

change your username you bellend

 

you bring shame on the Cockney Whites Uber fan mega posse

Wow

Excellent post White Boy.

Another one who can’t hold a simple conversation. All I did was ask what I was doing to piss away British culture. Maybe you’ll be able to help explain? 

 

6 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

I'm truly struggling to believe that the ECHR "laws" actually directly allow for such drivel, but that our judges (some of them) are simply taking the piss with their (politically) driven interpretations.

We've had the intention to amend our law to give judges more leeway on these interpretations and not be stuck to keeping them here, but that came to nowt. 

Not sure if it would have made any difference anyway, as they seem to just produce ever more ridiculous decisions. 

Now time to become far more stringent with our own laws, via ammendments or new legislation. Remove all mechanisms to produce these mind boggling outcomes.

Just can't see it happening with either red or blue.

 

Over 40k appeals on the books at the moment, that’s as well as others on the backlog  which has increased massively. It looks like “just clear the backlog” isn’t quite as simple as first thought. 

2 minutes ago, royal white said:

Over 40k appeals on the books at the moment, that’s as well as others on the backlog  which has increased massively. It looks like “just clear the backlog” isn’t quite as simple as first thought. 

Many of those recently sent back, were voluntary, and in some cases paid to do so.

As distasteful as it seems, we'd be better off offering them a decent wedge to go back with the proviso they can never return, and will be immediately returned if they tried.

No further appeals, and absolutely no rights if they tried to re-enter.

May turn out cheaper, and would stop the gravy train.

May also be quicker than long drawn out "perfect" legislation. 

27 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Another one who can’t hold a simple conversation.

You would know ... you're the master of it.

57 minutes ago, royal white said:

Over 40k appeals on the books at the moment, that’s as well as others on the backlog  which has increased massively. It looks like “just clear the backlog” isn’t quite as simple as first thought. 

Tbf actually processing the applications and making a decision is going to open up more appeals, hopefully this also means most of the 40k are a step nearer to being sent back somewhere.  

4 minutes ago, Ani said:

Tbf actually processing the applications and making a decision is going to open up more appeals, hopefully this also means most of the 40k are a step nearer to being sent back somewhere.  

Then again. 
 

“There are a record 41,987 outstanding immigration appeals, largely on human rights grounds, which threaten to hamper Labour’s efforts to fast-track removal of illegal migrants. The backlog has risen by nearly a quarter since September and is up nearly 500 per cent from just 7,173 at the start of 2022.”

48 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

You would know ... you're the master of it.

Never question his simplicity pal.

3 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

Never question his simplicity pal.

The irony 😄

Just now, London Wanderer said:

The irony 😄

The idiocy.

You have leapt to conclusions.

Are you sure I wasn't making reference to your valiant efforts to recreate The Good Life?

16 minutes ago, royal white said:

Then again. 
 

“There are a record 41,987 outstanding immigration appeals, largely on human rights grounds, which threaten to hamper Labour’s efforts to fast-track removal of illegal migrants. The backlog has risen by nearly a quarter since September and is up nearly 500 per cent from just 7,173 at the start of 2022.”

Think you are missing my point, you can only appeal if you have a decision on your original application. So people are getting rejected and appealing. Which is a step along the process. Previously application processing was blocked up. 

2 minutes ago, Ani said:

Think you are missing my point, you can only appeal if you have a decision on your original application. So people are getting rejected and appealing. Which is a step along the process. Previously application processing was blocked up. 

Yes it maybe a step along the process but it’s rising which is not what anyone wants and with so many being successful in their appeals it doesn’t look good does it? Record numbers arriving daily isn’t going to help the cause either 

1 hour ago, wanderer1984 said:

You would know ... you're the master of it.

Quite the opposite mate. All I'm doing is opening it up to discussion.

We've both been argumentative fannies in the past & I'll happily apologise for my part in it. Here's your opportunity to have a grown up discussion. 

Here was @bolty58 post. 
It's attitudes like his that have got us to where we are today. Happy to piss away all culture that has evolved in the British Isles.

You agreed with it, which is why I asked. It's quite a claim, which is why I'm curious what it is I'm doing to piss away British culture ?

What's the issue with asking your opinion? I'm sure Bolty will be happy to elaborate as well if he's knocking about x 

Edited March 24, 20251 yr by London Wanderer

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

Yes it maybe a step along the process but it’s rising which is not what anyone wants and with so many being successful in their appeals it doesn’t look good does it? Record numbers arriving daily isn’t going to help the cause either 

It's a joke to be fair.

If it isn't addressed then we're only playing into the hands of the likes of Farage and Reform. 

The victims deserve better. 

47 minutes ago, royal white said:

Yes it maybe a step along the process but it’s rising which is not what anyone wants and with so many being successful in their appeals it doesn’t look good does it? Record numbers arriving daily isn’t going to help the cause either 

I agree on the new arrivals, I have said since the day Labour got elected if they have not sorted immigration by time of next election they will deserve not to get re elected.

The appeals rising is imo not such an issue. The backlog of cases was a disgrace, a 3-6 month application process was taking over 2 years. Catching up with the backlog  is progress. Hopefully the appeals can be dealt with quickly and sensibly so we can ‘send the buggars back’ 

Just seen the report below, as always the source might mean numbers are treated with caution, but an Interesting point is that % of cases being rejected has increased by 20 percentage points. Some of which will be changes made by Tories not just Labour. The scarey number as you have said is the number of appeals that are succesful.  

 

https://freemovement.org.uk/increase-in-home-office-refusals-sees-number-of-asylum-appeals-soar-in-latest-tribunal-statistics/#:~:text=Almost half of the asylum,help people through the system.

Edited March 24, 20251 yr by Ani

18 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Quite the opposite mate. All I'm doing is opening it up to discussion.

We've both been argumentative fannies in the past & I'll happily apologise for my part in it. Here's your opportunity to have a grown up discussion. 

Here was @bolty58 post. 
It's attitudes like his that have got us to where we are today. Happy to piss away all culture that has evolved in the British Isles.

You agreed with it, which is why I asked. It's quite a claim, which is why I'm curious what it is I'm doing to piss away British culture ?

What's the issue with asking your opinion? I'm sure Bolty will be happy to elaborate as well if he's knocking about x 

Elaborate? Positively steaming!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, that's 'evaporate'. Carry on.

This church mon getting grilled on GMTV here.

He's got a right flap on.

Appointed a guy twice who was under investigation for abusing kids.

Richard Madley gone full on Partridge referring to them as bent men

8 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Elaborate? Positively steaming!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, that's 'evaporate'. Carry on.

So you’ve no idea how to answer it then 😂

43 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

So you’ve no idea how to answer it then 😂

Please cut him some slack. He is exceptionally fat and it clouds his cognition 

Gouged his missus eyes out whilst she was sleeping. Got a life sentence in 2011, currently in an open prison. People like this should never be allowed back into society. 
 

Victim and perpetrator both white and English for balance.